Cargando…
Modelling state‐transition dynamics in resting‐state brain signals by the hidden Markov and Gaussian mixture models
Recent studies have proposed that one can summarize brain activity into dynamics among a relatively small number of hidden states and that such an approach is a promising tool for revealing brain function. Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are a prevalent approach to inferring such neural dynamics among d...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34250639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15386 |
_version_ | 1784749164301647872 |
---|---|
author | Ezaki, Takahiro Himeno, Yu Watanabe, Takamitsu Masuda, Naoki |
author_facet | Ezaki, Takahiro Himeno, Yu Watanabe, Takamitsu Masuda, Naoki |
author_sort | Ezaki, Takahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent studies have proposed that one can summarize brain activity into dynamics among a relatively small number of hidden states and that such an approach is a promising tool for revealing brain function. Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are a prevalent approach to inferring such neural dynamics among discrete brain states. However, the impact of assuming Markovian structure in neural time series data has not been sufficiently examined. Here, to address this situation and examine the performance of the HMM, we compare the model with the Gaussian mixture model (GMM), which is with no temporal regularization and thus a statistically simpler model than the HMM, by applying both models to synthetic time series generated from empirical resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. We compared the GMM and HMM for various sampling frequencies, lengths of recording per participant, numbers of participants and numbers of independent component signals. We find that the HMM attains a better accuracy of estimating the hidden state than the GMM in a majority of cases. However, we also find that the accuracy of the GMM is comparable to that of the HMM under the condition that the sampling frequency is reasonably low (e.g., TR = 2.88 or 3.60 s) or the data are relatively short. These results suggest that the GMM can be a viable alternative to the HMM for investigating hidden‐state dynamics under this condition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9291560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92915602022-07-20 Modelling state‐transition dynamics in resting‐state brain signals by the hidden Markov and Gaussian mixture models Ezaki, Takahiro Himeno, Yu Watanabe, Takamitsu Masuda, Naoki Eur J Neurosci Cognitive Neuroscience Recent studies have proposed that one can summarize brain activity into dynamics among a relatively small number of hidden states and that such an approach is a promising tool for revealing brain function. Hidden Markov models (HMMs) are a prevalent approach to inferring such neural dynamics among discrete brain states. However, the impact of assuming Markovian structure in neural time series data has not been sufficiently examined. Here, to address this situation and examine the performance of the HMM, we compare the model with the Gaussian mixture model (GMM), which is with no temporal regularization and thus a statistically simpler model than the HMM, by applying both models to synthetic time series generated from empirical resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. We compared the GMM and HMM for various sampling frequencies, lengths of recording per participant, numbers of participants and numbers of independent component signals. We find that the HMM attains a better accuracy of estimating the hidden state than the GMM in a majority of cases. However, we also find that the accuracy of the GMM is comparable to that of the HMM under the condition that the sampling frequency is reasonably low (e.g., TR = 2.88 or 3.60 s) or the data are relatively short. These results suggest that the GMM can be a viable alternative to the HMM for investigating hidden‐state dynamics under this condition. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-22 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9291560/ /pubmed/34250639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15386 Text en © 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Cognitive Neuroscience Ezaki, Takahiro Himeno, Yu Watanabe, Takamitsu Masuda, Naoki Modelling state‐transition dynamics in resting‐state brain signals by the hidden Markov and Gaussian mixture models |
title | Modelling state‐transition dynamics in resting‐state brain signals by the hidden Markov and Gaussian mixture models |
title_full | Modelling state‐transition dynamics in resting‐state brain signals by the hidden Markov and Gaussian mixture models |
title_fullStr | Modelling state‐transition dynamics in resting‐state brain signals by the hidden Markov and Gaussian mixture models |
title_full_unstemmed | Modelling state‐transition dynamics in resting‐state brain signals by the hidden Markov and Gaussian mixture models |
title_short | Modelling state‐transition dynamics in resting‐state brain signals by the hidden Markov and Gaussian mixture models |
title_sort | modelling state‐transition dynamics in resting‐state brain signals by the hidden markov and gaussian mixture models |
topic | Cognitive Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34250639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15386 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ezakitakahiro modellingstatetransitiondynamicsinrestingstatebrainsignalsbythehiddenmarkovandgaussianmixturemodels AT himenoyu modellingstatetransitiondynamicsinrestingstatebrainsignalsbythehiddenmarkovandgaussianmixturemodels AT watanabetakamitsu modellingstatetransitiondynamicsinrestingstatebrainsignalsbythehiddenmarkovandgaussianmixturemodels AT masudanaoki modellingstatetransitiondynamicsinrestingstatebrainsignalsbythehiddenmarkovandgaussianmixturemodels |