Cargando…

Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) has been established as a critical risk factor for prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The clinical implications of lymph node dissection (LND) have been debated. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic impact of LND by multicenter retrospec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Umeda, Yuzo, Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu, Kojima, Toru, Satoh, Daisuke, Sui, Kenta, Endo, Yoshikatsu, Inagaki, Masaru, Oishi, Masahiro, Yagi, Takahito, Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34473411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1038
_version_ 1784749172235173888
author Umeda, Yuzo
Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu
Kojima, Toru
Satoh, Daisuke
Sui, Kenta
Endo, Yoshikatsu
Inagaki, Masaru
Oishi, Masahiro
Yagi, Takahito
Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi
author_facet Umeda, Yuzo
Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu
Kojima, Toru
Satoh, Daisuke
Sui, Kenta
Endo, Yoshikatsu
Inagaki, Masaru
Oishi, Masahiro
Yagi, Takahito
Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi
author_sort Umeda, Yuzo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) has been established as a critical risk factor for prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The clinical implications of lymph node dissection (LND) have been debated. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic impact of LND by multicenter retrospective analysis. METHODS: A total of 310 ICC patients who had undergone curative resection between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic impact of LND was estimated under an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach using propensity scores. RESULTS: LND was performed for 224 patients (72%), with LNM pathologically confirmed in 90 patients (40%). Prognosis was poorer for patients with LNM (median survival, 16.9 months) than for those without (57.2 months; P < .0001). One‐, 3‐, and 5‐year overall survival rates (OS) were comparable among LND+ (81.6%, 48.0%, and 37.5%, respectively) and LND– groups (81.6%, 55.4%, and 44.6%, respectively). However, advanced tumor, as characterized by larger tumor, multinodular lesions, and serosal invasion, was significantly more frequent in the LND+ group than in the LND– group. After IPTW adjusting for imbalances, 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year OS were better in the LND+ group (83.5%, 52.2%, and 42.8%, respectively) than in the LND– group (71.9%, 32.4%, and 23.4%, respectively; P = .046). LND thus showed significant prognostic impact (hazard ratio = 0.58, 95%CI = |0.39|–|0.84|, P = .005), especially in hilar ICC. However, peripheral ICC displayed no therapeutic benefit from LND. CONCLUSIONS: LND could have a significant role to play in improving oncologic outcomes. Therapeutic LND should be implemented on the basis of tumor location and tumor advancement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92915932022-07-20 Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis Umeda, Yuzo Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu Kojima, Toru Satoh, Daisuke Sui, Kenta Endo, Yoshikatsu Inagaki, Masaru Oishi, Masahiro Yagi, Takahito Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci Plenary Session BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) has been established as a critical risk factor for prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The clinical implications of lymph node dissection (LND) have been debated. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic impact of LND by multicenter retrospective analysis. METHODS: A total of 310 ICC patients who had undergone curative resection between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic impact of LND was estimated under an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach using propensity scores. RESULTS: LND was performed for 224 patients (72%), with LNM pathologically confirmed in 90 patients (40%). Prognosis was poorer for patients with LNM (median survival, 16.9 months) than for those without (57.2 months; P < .0001). One‐, 3‐, and 5‐year overall survival rates (OS) were comparable among LND+ (81.6%, 48.0%, and 37.5%, respectively) and LND– groups (81.6%, 55.4%, and 44.6%, respectively). However, advanced tumor, as characterized by larger tumor, multinodular lesions, and serosal invasion, was significantly more frequent in the LND+ group than in the LND– group. After IPTW adjusting for imbalances, 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year OS were better in the LND+ group (83.5%, 52.2%, and 42.8%, respectively) than in the LND– group (71.9%, 32.4%, and 23.4%, respectively; P = .046). LND thus showed significant prognostic impact (hazard ratio = 0.58, 95%CI = |0.39|–|0.84|, P = .005), especially in hilar ICC. However, peripheral ICC displayed no therapeutic benefit from LND. CONCLUSIONS: LND could have a significant role to play in improving oncologic outcomes. Therapeutic LND should be implemented on the basis of tumor location and tumor advancement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-16 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9291593/ /pubmed/34473411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1038 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Plenary Session
Umeda, Yuzo
Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu
Kojima, Toru
Satoh, Daisuke
Sui, Kenta
Endo, Yoshikatsu
Inagaki, Masaru
Oishi, Masahiro
Yagi, Takahito
Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi
Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis
title Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis
title_full Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis
title_fullStr Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis
title_short Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis
title_sort impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis
topic Plenary Session
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34473411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1038
work_keys_str_mv AT umedayuzo impactoflymphnodedissectiononclinicaloutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingwithsurvivalanalysis
AT mitsuhashitoshiharu impactoflymphnodedissectiononclinicaloutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingwithsurvivalanalysis
AT kojimatoru impactoflymphnodedissectiononclinicaloutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingwithsurvivalanalysis
AT satohdaisuke impactoflymphnodedissectiononclinicaloutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingwithsurvivalanalysis
AT suikenta impactoflymphnodedissectiononclinicaloutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingwithsurvivalanalysis
AT endoyoshikatsu impactoflymphnodedissectiononclinicaloutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingwithsurvivalanalysis
AT inagakimasaru impactoflymphnodedissectiononclinicaloutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingwithsurvivalanalysis
AT oishimasahiro impactoflymphnodedissectiononclinicaloutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingwithsurvivalanalysis
AT yagitakahito impactoflymphnodedissectiononclinicaloutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingwithsurvivalanalysis
AT fujiwaratoshiyoshi impactoflymphnodedissectiononclinicaloutcomesofintrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingwithsurvivalanalysis