Cargando…

Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study

BACKGROUND: His bundle pacing (HBP) is a physiological pacing strategy to preserve the electrical synchrony of ventricular conduction and left ventricular (LV) function. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative physiological pacing technique. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cardiac elec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheng, Xia, Pan, Yi‐Wen, Yu, Chan, Wang, Bei, Zhang, Pei, Li, Jing, Zhang, Jie‐Fang, Chen, Shi‐Quan, Wang, Min, Sun, Ya‐Xun, Jiang, Dong‐Mei, Yang, Ying, Ye, Yang, Cha, Yong‐Mei, Fu, Guo‐Sheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14331
_version_ 1784749172768899072
author Sheng, Xia
Pan, Yi‐Wen
Yu, Chan
Wang, Bei
Zhang, Pei
Li, Jing
Zhang, Jie‐Fang
Chen, Shi‐Quan
Wang, Min
Sun, Ya‐Xun
Jiang, Dong‐Mei
Yang, Ying
Ye, Yang
Cha, Yong‐Mei
Fu, Guo‐Sheng
author_facet Sheng, Xia
Pan, Yi‐Wen
Yu, Chan
Wang, Bei
Zhang, Pei
Li, Jing
Zhang, Jie‐Fang
Chen, Shi‐Quan
Wang, Min
Sun, Ya‐Xun
Jiang, Dong‐Mei
Yang, Ying
Ye, Yang
Cha, Yong‐Mei
Fu, Guo‐Sheng
author_sort Sheng, Xia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: His bundle pacing (HBP) is a physiological pacing strategy to preserve the electrical synchrony of ventricular conduction and left ventricular (LV) function. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative physiological pacing technique. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cardiac electrical and mechanical synchrony comparing LBBP and HBP in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Consecutive patients with symptomatic bradycardia and AF were enrolled from January to June of 2019. The cardiac electrical and mechanical synchrony in different pacing mode were evaluated at baseline and after implantation. RESULTS: Both HBP and LBBP were performed in 20 patients. LBBP significantly widened the QRS duration compared with the intrinsic conduction (113.2 ± 14.5  vs. 96.5 ± 16.2 ms; p = .01), while HBP did not (104.5 ± 22.3  vs. 96.5 ± 16.2 ms; p = .12). Both LBBP and HBP patients had similar LV myocardial strain measurements for the mechanical synchrony evaluation without significant change compared with baseline. There was no significant difference in right ventricular synchrony measurement between LBBP and HBP. Compared to HBP, LBBP had less interventricular synchrony (IMVD, 14.7 ± 9.2  vs. 3.1 ± 12.7 ms, p < .01; Ts‐LV‐RV, 37.9 ± 10.7  vs. 18.5 ± 10.8 ms, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although LBBP's a physiological pacing mode can achieve a similar cardiac electrical and mechanical synchronization when compared to HBP, LBBP results in modest delay in RV activation, and the clinical implication remains to be studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92915952022-07-20 Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study Sheng, Xia Pan, Yi‐Wen Yu, Chan Wang, Bei Zhang, Pei Li, Jing Zhang, Jie‐Fang Chen, Shi‐Quan Wang, Min Sun, Ya‐Xun Jiang, Dong‐Mei Yang, Ying Ye, Yang Cha, Yong‐Mei Fu, Guo‐Sheng Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Electrophysiology BACKGROUND: His bundle pacing (HBP) is a physiological pacing strategy to preserve the electrical synchrony of ventricular conduction and left ventricular (LV) function. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative physiological pacing technique. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cardiac electrical and mechanical synchrony comparing LBBP and HBP in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Consecutive patients with symptomatic bradycardia and AF were enrolled from January to June of 2019. The cardiac electrical and mechanical synchrony in different pacing mode were evaluated at baseline and after implantation. RESULTS: Both HBP and LBBP were performed in 20 patients. LBBP significantly widened the QRS duration compared with the intrinsic conduction (113.2 ± 14.5  vs. 96.5 ± 16.2 ms; p = .01), while HBP did not (104.5 ± 22.3  vs. 96.5 ± 16.2 ms; p = .12). Both LBBP and HBP patients had similar LV myocardial strain measurements for the mechanical synchrony evaluation without significant change compared with baseline. There was no significant difference in right ventricular synchrony measurement between LBBP and HBP. Compared to HBP, LBBP had less interventricular synchrony (IMVD, 14.7 ± 9.2  vs. 3.1 ± 12.7 ms, p < .01; Ts‐LV‐RV, 37.9 ± 10.7  vs. 18.5 ± 10.8 ms, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although LBBP's a physiological pacing mode can achieve a similar cardiac electrical and mechanical synchronization when compared to HBP, LBBP results in modest delay in RV activation, and the clinical implication remains to be studied. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-24 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9291595/ /pubmed/34337768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14331 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Electrophysiology
Sheng, Xia
Pan, Yi‐Wen
Yu, Chan
Wang, Bei
Zhang, Pei
Li, Jing
Zhang, Jie‐Fang
Chen, Shi‐Quan
Wang, Min
Sun, Ya‐Xun
Jiang, Dong‐Mei
Yang, Ying
Ye, Yang
Cha, Yong‐Mei
Fu, Guo‐Sheng
Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study
title Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study
title_full Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study
title_fullStr Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study
title_short Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study
title_sort comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: an intra‐patient‐controlled study
topic Electrophysiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337768
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14331
work_keys_str_mv AT shengxia comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT panyiwen comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT yuchan comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT wangbei comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT zhangpei comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT lijing comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT zhangjiefang comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT chenshiquan comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT wangmin comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT sunyaxun comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT jiangdongmei comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT yangying comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT yeyang comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT chayongmei comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy
AT fuguosheng comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy