Cargando…
Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study
BACKGROUND: His bundle pacing (HBP) is a physiological pacing strategy to preserve the electrical synchrony of ventricular conduction and left ventricular (LV) function. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative physiological pacing technique. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cardiac elec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14331 |
_version_ | 1784749172768899072 |
---|---|
author | Sheng, Xia Pan, Yi‐Wen Yu, Chan Wang, Bei Zhang, Pei Li, Jing Zhang, Jie‐Fang Chen, Shi‐Quan Wang, Min Sun, Ya‐Xun Jiang, Dong‐Mei Yang, Ying Ye, Yang Cha, Yong‐Mei Fu, Guo‐Sheng |
author_facet | Sheng, Xia Pan, Yi‐Wen Yu, Chan Wang, Bei Zhang, Pei Li, Jing Zhang, Jie‐Fang Chen, Shi‐Quan Wang, Min Sun, Ya‐Xun Jiang, Dong‐Mei Yang, Ying Ye, Yang Cha, Yong‐Mei Fu, Guo‐Sheng |
author_sort | Sheng, Xia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: His bundle pacing (HBP) is a physiological pacing strategy to preserve the electrical synchrony of ventricular conduction and left ventricular (LV) function. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative physiological pacing technique. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cardiac electrical and mechanical synchrony comparing LBBP and HBP in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Consecutive patients with symptomatic bradycardia and AF were enrolled from January to June of 2019. The cardiac electrical and mechanical synchrony in different pacing mode were evaluated at baseline and after implantation. RESULTS: Both HBP and LBBP were performed in 20 patients. LBBP significantly widened the QRS duration compared with the intrinsic conduction (113.2 ± 14.5 vs. 96.5 ± 16.2 ms; p = .01), while HBP did not (104.5 ± 22.3 vs. 96.5 ± 16.2 ms; p = .12). Both LBBP and HBP patients had similar LV myocardial strain measurements for the mechanical synchrony evaluation without significant change compared with baseline. There was no significant difference in right ventricular synchrony measurement between LBBP and HBP. Compared to HBP, LBBP had less interventricular synchrony (IMVD, 14.7 ± 9.2 vs. 3.1 ± 12.7 ms, p < .01; Ts‐LV‐RV, 37.9 ± 10.7 vs. 18.5 ± 10.8 ms, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although LBBP's a physiological pacing mode can achieve a similar cardiac electrical and mechanical synchronization when compared to HBP, LBBP results in modest delay in RV activation, and the clinical implication remains to be studied. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9291595 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92915952022-07-20 Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study Sheng, Xia Pan, Yi‐Wen Yu, Chan Wang, Bei Zhang, Pei Li, Jing Zhang, Jie‐Fang Chen, Shi‐Quan Wang, Min Sun, Ya‐Xun Jiang, Dong‐Mei Yang, Ying Ye, Yang Cha, Yong‐Mei Fu, Guo‐Sheng Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Electrophysiology BACKGROUND: His bundle pacing (HBP) is a physiological pacing strategy to preserve the electrical synchrony of ventricular conduction and left ventricular (LV) function. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative physiological pacing technique. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cardiac electrical and mechanical synchrony comparing LBBP and HBP in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Consecutive patients with symptomatic bradycardia and AF were enrolled from January to June of 2019. The cardiac electrical and mechanical synchrony in different pacing mode were evaluated at baseline and after implantation. RESULTS: Both HBP and LBBP were performed in 20 patients. LBBP significantly widened the QRS duration compared with the intrinsic conduction (113.2 ± 14.5 vs. 96.5 ± 16.2 ms; p = .01), while HBP did not (104.5 ± 22.3 vs. 96.5 ± 16.2 ms; p = .12). Both LBBP and HBP patients had similar LV myocardial strain measurements for the mechanical synchrony evaluation without significant change compared with baseline. There was no significant difference in right ventricular synchrony measurement between LBBP and HBP. Compared to HBP, LBBP had less interventricular synchrony (IMVD, 14.7 ± 9.2 vs. 3.1 ± 12.7 ms, p < .01; Ts‐LV‐RV, 37.9 ± 10.7 vs. 18.5 ± 10.8 ms, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although LBBP's a physiological pacing mode can achieve a similar cardiac electrical and mechanical synchronization when compared to HBP, LBBP results in modest delay in RV activation, and the clinical implication remains to be studied. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-24 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9291595/ /pubmed/34337768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14331 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Electrophysiology Sheng, Xia Pan, Yi‐Wen Yu, Chan Wang, Bei Zhang, Pei Li, Jing Zhang, Jie‐Fang Chen, Shi‐Quan Wang, Min Sun, Ya‐Xun Jiang, Dong‐Mei Yang, Ying Ye, Yang Cha, Yong‐Mei Fu, Guo‐Sheng Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study |
title | Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study |
title_full | Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study |
title_short | Comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: An intra‐patient‐controlled study |
title_sort | comparison of synchronization between left bundle branch and his bundle pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: an intra‐patient‐controlled study |
topic | Electrophysiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14331 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shengxia comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT panyiwen comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT yuchan comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT wangbei comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT zhangpei comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT lijing comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT zhangjiefang comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT chenshiquan comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT wangmin comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT sunyaxun comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT jiangdongmei comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT yangying comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT yeyang comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT chayongmei comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy AT fuguosheng comparisonofsynchronizationbetweenleftbundlebranchandhisbundlepacinginatrialfibrillationpatientsanintrapatientcontrolledstudy |