Cargando…

Cocaine profiling method retrospectively developed with nontargeted discovery of markers using liquid chromatography with time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry data

Illicit drug profiling performed by forensic laboratories assists law enforcement agencies through providing information about chemical and/or physical characteristics of seized specimens. In this article, a model was developed for the comparison of seized cocaine based on retrospective analysis of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carby‐Robinson, Daniel, Dalsgaard, Petur Weihe, Mollerup, Christian Brinch, Linnet, Kristian, Rasmussen, Brian Schou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34265168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dta.3130
_version_ 1784749176016338944
author Carby‐Robinson, Daniel
Dalsgaard, Petur Weihe
Mollerup, Christian Brinch
Linnet, Kristian
Rasmussen, Brian Schou
author_facet Carby‐Robinson, Daniel
Dalsgaard, Petur Weihe
Mollerup, Christian Brinch
Linnet, Kristian
Rasmussen, Brian Schou
author_sort Carby‐Robinson, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Illicit drug profiling performed by forensic laboratories assists law enforcement agencies through providing information about chemical and/or physical characteristics of seized specimens. In this article, a model was developed for the comparison of seized cocaine based on retrospective analysis of data generated from ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography with time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC‐TOF‐MS) comprehensive drug screening. A nontargeted approach to discover target compounds was employed, which generated 53 potential markers using data from cocaine positive samples. Twelve marker compounds were selected for the development of the final profiling model. The selection included a mixture of commonly used cocaine profiling targets and other cocaine‐related compounds. Combinations of pretreatments and comparison metrics were assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves to determine the combination with the best discrimination between linked and unlinked populations. Using data from 382 linked and 34,519 unlinked distances, a classification model was developed using a combination of the standardization and normalization transformations with Canberra distance, resulting in a linked cut‐off with a 0.5% false positive rate. The present study demonstrates the applicability of retrospectively developing a cocaine profiling model using data generated from UHPLC‐TOF‐MS nontargeted drug screening without pre‐existing information about cocaine impurities. The developed workflow was not specific to cocaine and thus could potentially be applied to any seized drug in which there are both sufficient data and impurities present.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92916092022-07-20 Cocaine profiling method retrospectively developed with nontargeted discovery of markers using liquid chromatography with time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry data Carby‐Robinson, Daniel Dalsgaard, Petur Weihe Mollerup, Christian Brinch Linnet, Kristian Rasmussen, Brian Schou Drug Test Anal Special Issue ‐ Research Articles Illicit drug profiling performed by forensic laboratories assists law enforcement agencies through providing information about chemical and/or physical characteristics of seized specimens. In this article, a model was developed for the comparison of seized cocaine based on retrospective analysis of data generated from ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography with time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC‐TOF‐MS) comprehensive drug screening. A nontargeted approach to discover target compounds was employed, which generated 53 potential markers using data from cocaine positive samples. Twelve marker compounds were selected for the development of the final profiling model. The selection included a mixture of commonly used cocaine profiling targets and other cocaine‐related compounds. Combinations of pretreatments and comparison metrics were assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves to determine the combination with the best discrimination between linked and unlinked populations. Using data from 382 linked and 34,519 unlinked distances, a classification model was developed using a combination of the standardization and normalization transformations with Canberra distance, resulting in a linked cut‐off with a 0.5% false positive rate. The present study demonstrates the applicability of retrospectively developing a cocaine profiling model using data generated from UHPLC‐TOF‐MS nontargeted drug screening without pre‐existing information about cocaine impurities. The developed workflow was not specific to cocaine and thus could potentially be applied to any seized drug in which there are both sufficient data and impurities present. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-27 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9291609/ /pubmed/34265168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dta.3130 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Drug Testing and Analysis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Special Issue ‐ Research Articles
Carby‐Robinson, Daniel
Dalsgaard, Petur Weihe
Mollerup, Christian Brinch
Linnet, Kristian
Rasmussen, Brian Schou
Cocaine profiling method retrospectively developed with nontargeted discovery of markers using liquid chromatography with time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry data
title Cocaine profiling method retrospectively developed with nontargeted discovery of markers using liquid chromatography with time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry data
title_full Cocaine profiling method retrospectively developed with nontargeted discovery of markers using liquid chromatography with time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry data
title_fullStr Cocaine profiling method retrospectively developed with nontargeted discovery of markers using liquid chromatography with time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry data
title_full_unstemmed Cocaine profiling method retrospectively developed with nontargeted discovery of markers using liquid chromatography with time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry data
title_short Cocaine profiling method retrospectively developed with nontargeted discovery of markers using liquid chromatography with time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry data
title_sort cocaine profiling method retrospectively developed with nontargeted discovery of markers using liquid chromatography with time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry data
topic Special Issue ‐ Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34265168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dta.3130
work_keys_str_mv AT carbyrobinsondaniel cocaineprofilingmethodretrospectivelydevelopedwithnontargeteddiscoveryofmarkersusingliquidchromatographywithtimeofflightmassspectrometrydata
AT dalsgaardpeturweihe cocaineprofilingmethodretrospectivelydevelopedwithnontargeteddiscoveryofmarkersusingliquidchromatographywithtimeofflightmassspectrometrydata
AT mollerupchristianbrinch cocaineprofilingmethodretrospectivelydevelopedwithnontargeteddiscoveryofmarkersusingliquidchromatographywithtimeofflightmassspectrometrydata
AT linnetkristian cocaineprofilingmethodretrospectivelydevelopedwithnontargeteddiscoveryofmarkersusingliquidchromatographywithtimeofflightmassspectrometrydata
AT rasmussenbrianschou cocaineprofilingmethodretrospectivelydevelopedwithnontargeteddiscoveryofmarkersusingliquidchromatographywithtimeofflightmassspectrometrydata