Cargando…
Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure
INTRODUCTION: Reduced tongue pressure may render eating and swallowing difficult. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the tongue training device can also be used as a diagnostic device and whether its sensitivity and specificity are equal to the numerical tongue pressure measuring d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34425018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13232 |
_version_ | 1784749179347664896 |
---|---|
author | Imamura, Yoshiki Chebib, Najla Ohta, Midori Maria Schulte‐Eickhoff, Regina Mekki, Mustapha Schimmel, Martin Arakawa, Itsuka Graf, Christophe Sato, Yuji Müller, Frauke |
author_facet | Imamura, Yoshiki Chebib, Najla Ohta, Midori Maria Schulte‐Eickhoff, Regina Mekki, Mustapha Schimmel, Martin Arakawa, Itsuka Graf, Christophe Sato, Yuji Müller, Frauke |
author_sort | Imamura, Yoshiki |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Reduced tongue pressure may render eating and swallowing difficult. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the tongue training device can also be used as a diagnostic device and whether its sensitivity and specificity are equal to the numerical tongue pressure measuring device. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The target group is patients aged 70 years and over who are hospitalised for rehabilitation. Tongue pressure was measured by both, a tongue pressure measuring instrument and a tongue training tool. The diagnosis of the reduced tongue pressure was made with the tongue pressure measuring instrument and set the verified with the novel tongue training tool. RESULTS: Sixty‐two participants were included in the study. Forty‐five were classified by the tongue pressure measuring device and 53 by the tongue training device as ‘low tongue pressure’. Spearman correlation confirmed a positive correlation between the tongue pressure measuring device and the tongue training device r(s) = 0.800, p = 0.01 level (2‐tailed). The tongue training device test identified sensitivity was 100%, and its specificity was 52.9%. The AUC of the ROC curve is 0.901. CONCLUSION: The tongue training device seems a simple, safe and readily available alternative to the tongue pressure measuring device for the diagnosis of low tongue pressure, with an excellent sensitivity and very good specificity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9291622 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92916222022-07-20 Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure Imamura, Yoshiki Chebib, Najla Ohta, Midori Maria Schulte‐Eickhoff, Regina Mekki, Mustapha Schimmel, Martin Arakawa, Itsuka Graf, Christophe Sato, Yuji Müller, Frauke J Oral Rehabil Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Reduced tongue pressure may render eating and swallowing difficult. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the tongue training device can also be used as a diagnostic device and whether its sensitivity and specificity are equal to the numerical tongue pressure measuring device. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The target group is patients aged 70 years and over who are hospitalised for rehabilitation. Tongue pressure was measured by both, a tongue pressure measuring instrument and a tongue training tool. The diagnosis of the reduced tongue pressure was made with the tongue pressure measuring instrument and set the verified with the novel tongue training tool. RESULTS: Sixty‐two participants were included in the study. Forty‐five were classified by the tongue pressure measuring device and 53 by the tongue training device as ‘low tongue pressure’. Spearman correlation confirmed a positive correlation between the tongue pressure measuring device and the tongue training device r(s) = 0.800, p = 0.01 level (2‐tailed). The tongue training device test identified sensitivity was 100%, and its specificity was 52.9%. The AUC of the ROC curve is 0.901. CONCLUSION: The tongue training device seems a simple, safe and readily available alternative to the tongue pressure measuring device for the diagnosis of low tongue pressure, with an excellent sensitivity and very good specificity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-12 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9291622/ /pubmed/34425018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13232 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Imamura, Yoshiki Chebib, Najla Ohta, Midori Maria Schulte‐Eickhoff, Regina Mekki, Mustapha Schimmel, Martin Arakawa, Itsuka Graf, Christophe Sato, Yuji Müller, Frauke Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure |
title | Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure |
title_full | Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure |
title_fullStr | Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure |
title_short | Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure |
title_sort | validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291622/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34425018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13232 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT imamurayoshiki validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure AT chebibnajla validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure AT ohtamidori validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure AT mariaschulteeickhoffregina validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure AT mekkimustapha validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure AT schimmelmartin validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure AT arakawaitsuka validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure AT grafchristophe validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure AT satoyuji validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure AT mullerfrauke validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure |