Cargando…

Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure

INTRODUCTION: Reduced tongue pressure may render eating and swallowing difficult. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the tongue training device can also be used as a diagnostic device and whether its sensitivity and specificity are equal to the numerical tongue pressure measuring d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imamura, Yoshiki, Chebib, Najla, Ohta, Midori, Maria Schulte‐Eickhoff, Regina, Mekki, Mustapha, Schimmel, Martin, Arakawa, Itsuka, Graf, Christophe, Sato, Yuji, Müller, Frauke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34425018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13232
_version_ 1784749179347664896
author Imamura, Yoshiki
Chebib, Najla
Ohta, Midori
Maria Schulte‐Eickhoff, Regina
Mekki, Mustapha
Schimmel, Martin
Arakawa, Itsuka
Graf, Christophe
Sato, Yuji
Müller, Frauke
author_facet Imamura, Yoshiki
Chebib, Najla
Ohta, Midori
Maria Schulte‐Eickhoff, Regina
Mekki, Mustapha
Schimmel, Martin
Arakawa, Itsuka
Graf, Christophe
Sato, Yuji
Müller, Frauke
author_sort Imamura, Yoshiki
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Reduced tongue pressure may render eating and swallowing difficult. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the tongue training device can also be used as a diagnostic device and whether its sensitivity and specificity are equal to the numerical tongue pressure measuring device. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The target group is patients aged 70 years and over who are hospitalised for rehabilitation. Tongue pressure was measured by both, a tongue pressure measuring instrument and a tongue training tool. The diagnosis of the reduced tongue pressure was made with the tongue pressure measuring instrument and set the verified with the novel tongue training tool. RESULTS: Sixty‐two participants were included in the study. Forty‐five were classified by the tongue pressure measuring device and 53 by the tongue training device as ‘low tongue pressure’. Spearman correlation confirmed a positive correlation between the tongue pressure measuring device and the tongue training device r(s) = 0.800, p = 0.01 level (2‐tailed). The tongue training device test identified sensitivity was 100%, and its specificity was 52.9%. The AUC of the ROC curve is 0.901. CONCLUSION: The tongue training device seems a simple, safe and readily available alternative to the tongue pressure measuring device for the diagnosis of low tongue pressure, with an excellent sensitivity and very good specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92916222022-07-20 Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure Imamura, Yoshiki Chebib, Najla Ohta, Midori Maria Schulte‐Eickhoff, Regina Mekki, Mustapha Schimmel, Martin Arakawa, Itsuka Graf, Christophe Sato, Yuji Müller, Frauke J Oral Rehabil Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Reduced tongue pressure may render eating and swallowing difficult. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the tongue training device can also be used as a diagnostic device and whether its sensitivity and specificity are equal to the numerical tongue pressure measuring device. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The target group is patients aged 70 years and over who are hospitalised for rehabilitation. Tongue pressure was measured by both, a tongue pressure measuring instrument and a tongue training tool. The diagnosis of the reduced tongue pressure was made with the tongue pressure measuring instrument and set the verified with the novel tongue training tool. RESULTS: Sixty‐two participants were included in the study. Forty‐five were classified by the tongue pressure measuring device and 53 by the tongue training device as ‘low tongue pressure’. Spearman correlation confirmed a positive correlation between the tongue pressure measuring device and the tongue training device r(s) = 0.800, p = 0.01 level (2‐tailed). The tongue training device test identified sensitivity was 100%, and its specificity was 52.9%. The AUC of the ROC curve is 0.901. CONCLUSION: The tongue training device seems a simple, safe and readily available alternative to the tongue pressure measuring device for the diagnosis of low tongue pressure, with an excellent sensitivity and very good specificity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-12 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9291622/ /pubmed/34425018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13232 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Imamura, Yoshiki
Chebib, Najla
Ohta, Midori
Maria Schulte‐Eickhoff, Regina
Mekki, Mustapha
Schimmel, Martin
Arakawa, Itsuka
Graf, Christophe
Sato, Yuji
Müller, Frauke
Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure
title Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure
title_full Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure
title_fullStr Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure
title_short Validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure
title_sort validation of a novel diagnostic tool for decreased tongue pressure
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34425018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.13232
work_keys_str_mv AT imamurayoshiki validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure
AT chebibnajla validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure
AT ohtamidori validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure
AT mariaschulteeickhoffregina validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure
AT mekkimustapha validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure
AT schimmelmartin validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure
AT arakawaitsuka validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure
AT grafchristophe validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure
AT satoyuji validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure
AT mullerfrauke validationofanoveldiagnostictoolfordecreasedtonguepressure