Cargando…

Predictive Risk Factors at Admission and a “Burning Point” During Hospitalization Serve as Sequential Alerts for Critical Illness in Patients With COVID-19

BACKGROUND: We intended to establish a novel critical illness prediction system combining baseline risk factors with dynamic laboratory tests for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We evaluated patients with COVID-19 admitted to Wuhan West Union Hospital between 12 January a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Zhengrong, Zhou, Mei, Xu, Juanjuan, Wang, Kai, Hao, Xingjie, Tan, Xueyun, Li, Hui, Wang, Fen, Dai, Chengguqiu, Ma, Guanzhou, Wang, Zhihui, Duan, Limin, Jin, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860737
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.816314
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We intended to establish a novel critical illness prediction system combining baseline risk factors with dynamic laboratory tests for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We evaluated patients with COVID-19 admitted to Wuhan West Union Hospital between 12 January and 25 February 2020. The data of patients were collected, and the illness severity was assessed. RESULTS: Among 1,150 enrolled patients, 296 (25.7%) patients developed into critical illness. A baseline nomogram model consists of seven variables including age [odds ratio (OR), 1.028; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.004–1.052], sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (OR, 4.367; 95% CI, 3.230–5.903), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; OR, 1.094; 95% CI, 1.024–1.168), D-dimer (OR, 1.476; 95% CI, 1.107–1.968), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; OR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.001–1.006), international normalised ratio (INR; OR, 1.027; 95% CI, 0.999–1.055), and pneumonia area interpreted from computed tomography (CT) images (medium vs. small [OR, 4.358; 95% CI, 2.188–8.678], and large vs. small [OR, 9.567; 95% CI, 3.982–22.986]) were established to predict the risk for critical illness at admission. The differentiating power of this nomogram scoring system was perfect with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.960 (95% CI, 0.941–0.972) in the training set and an AUC of 0.958 (95% CI, 0.936–0.980) in the testing set. In addition, a linear mixed model (LMM) based on dynamic change of seven variables consisting of SOFA score (value, 2; increase per day [I/d], +0.49), NLR (value, 10.61; I/d, +2.07), C-reactive protein (CRP; value, 46.9 mg/L; I/d, +4.95), glucose (value, 7.83 mmol/L; I/d, +0.2), D-dimer (value, 6.08 μg/L; I/d, +0.28), LDH (value, 461 U/L; I/d, +13.95), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN value, 6.51 mmol/L; I/d, +0.55) were established to assist in predicting occurrence time of critical illness onset during hospitalization. CONCLUSION: The two-checkpoint system could assist in accurately and dynamically predicting critical illness and timely adjusting the treatment regimen for patients with COVID-19.