Cargando…
Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations
Cranial sutures join the many bones of the skull. They are therefore points of weakness and consequently subjected to the many mechanical stresses affecting the cranium. However, the way in which this impacts their morphological complexity remains unclear. We examine the intrinsic and extrinsic mech...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33773064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.24627 |
_version_ | 1784749204097204224 |
---|---|
author | Cheronet, Olivia Ash, Abigail Anders, Alexandra Dani, János Domboróczki, László Drozdova, Eva Francken, Michael Jovanovic, Marija Milasinovic, Lidija Pap, Ildiko Raczky, Pál Teschler‐Nicola, Maria Tvrdý, Zdeněk Wahl, Joachim Zariņa, Gunita Pinhasi, Ron |
author_facet | Cheronet, Olivia Ash, Abigail Anders, Alexandra Dani, János Domboróczki, László Drozdova, Eva Francken, Michael Jovanovic, Marija Milasinovic, Lidija Pap, Ildiko Raczky, Pál Teschler‐Nicola, Maria Tvrdý, Zdeněk Wahl, Joachim Zariņa, Gunita Pinhasi, Ron |
author_sort | Cheronet, Olivia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cranial sutures join the many bones of the skull. They are therefore points of weakness and consequently subjected to the many mechanical stresses affecting the cranium. However, the way in which this impacts their morphological complexity remains unclear. We examine the intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms of human sagittal sutures by quantifying the morphology from 107 individuals from archaeological populations spanning the Mesolithic to Middle ages, using standardized two‐dimensional photographs. Results show that the most important factor determining sutural complexity appears to be the position along the cranial vault from the junction with the coronal suture at its anterior‐most point to the junction with the lambdoid suture at its posterior‐most point. Conversely, factors such as age and lifeways show few trends in complexity, the most significant of which is a lower complexity in the sutures of Mesolithic individuals who consumed a tougher diet. The simple technique used in this study therefore allowed us to identify that, taken together, structural aspects play a more important role in defining the complexity of the human sagittal suture than extrinsic factors such as the mechanical forces imposed on the cranium by individuals' diet. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9291749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92917492022-07-20 Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations Cheronet, Olivia Ash, Abigail Anders, Alexandra Dani, János Domboróczki, László Drozdova, Eva Francken, Michael Jovanovic, Marija Milasinovic, Lidija Pap, Ildiko Raczky, Pál Teschler‐Nicola, Maria Tvrdý, Zdeněk Wahl, Joachim Zariņa, Gunita Pinhasi, Ron Anat Rec (Hoboken) FULL LENGTH ARTICLES Cranial sutures join the many bones of the skull. They are therefore points of weakness and consequently subjected to the many mechanical stresses affecting the cranium. However, the way in which this impacts their morphological complexity remains unclear. We examine the intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms of human sagittal sutures by quantifying the morphology from 107 individuals from archaeological populations spanning the Mesolithic to Middle ages, using standardized two‐dimensional photographs. Results show that the most important factor determining sutural complexity appears to be the position along the cranial vault from the junction with the coronal suture at its anterior‐most point to the junction with the lambdoid suture at its posterior‐most point. Conversely, factors such as age and lifeways show few trends in complexity, the most significant of which is a lower complexity in the sutures of Mesolithic individuals who consumed a tougher diet. The simple technique used in this study therefore allowed us to identify that, taken together, structural aspects play a more important role in defining the complexity of the human sagittal suture than extrinsic factors such as the mechanical forces imposed on the cranium by individuals' diet. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-04-05 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9291749/ /pubmed/33773064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.24627 Text en © 2021 The Authors. The Anatomical Record published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for Anatomy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | FULL LENGTH ARTICLES Cheronet, Olivia Ash, Abigail Anders, Alexandra Dani, János Domboróczki, László Drozdova, Eva Francken, Michael Jovanovic, Marija Milasinovic, Lidija Pap, Ildiko Raczky, Pál Teschler‐Nicola, Maria Tvrdý, Zdeněk Wahl, Joachim Zariņa, Gunita Pinhasi, Ron Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations |
title | Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations |
title_full | Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations |
title_fullStr | Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations |
title_full_unstemmed | Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations |
title_short | Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations |
title_sort | sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations |
topic | FULL LENGTH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33773064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.24627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cheronetolivia sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT ashabigail sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT andersalexandra sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT danijanos sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT domboroczkilaszlo sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT drozdovaeva sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT franckenmichael sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT jovanovicmarija sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT milasinoviclidija sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT papildiko sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT raczkypal sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT teschlernicolamaria sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT tvrdyzdenek sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT wahljoachim sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT zarinagunita sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations AT pinhasiron sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations |