Cargando…

Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations

Cranial sutures join the many bones of the skull. They are therefore points of weakness and consequently subjected to the many mechanical stresses affecting the cranium. However, the way in which this impacts their morphological complexity remains unclear. We examine the intrinsic and extrinsic mech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheronet, Olivia, Ash, Abigail, Anders, Alexandra, Dani, János, Domboróczki, László, Drozdova, Eva, Francken, Michael, Jovanovic, Marija, Milasinovic, Lidija, Pap, Ildiko, Raczky, Pál, Teschler‐Nicola, Maria, Tvrdý, Zdeněk, Wahl, Joachim, Zariņa, Gunita, Pinhasi, Ron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33773064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.24627
_version_ 1784749204097204224
author Cheronet, Olivia
Ash, Abigail
Anders, Alexandra
Dani, János
Domboróczki, László
Drozdova, Eva
Francken, Michael
Jovanovic, Marija
Milasinovic, Lidija
Pap, Ildiko
Raczky, Pál
Teschler‐Nicola, Maria
Tvrdý, Zdeněk
Wahl, Joachim
Zariņa, Gunita
Pinhasi, Ron
author_facet Cheronet, Olivia
Ash, Abigail
Anders, Alexandra
Dani, János
Domboróczki, László
Drozdova, Eva
Francken, Michael
Jovanovic, Marija
Milasinovic, Lidija
Pap, Ildiko
Raczky, Pál
Teschler‐Nicola, Maria
Tvrdý, Zdeněk
Wahl, Joachim
Zariņa, Gunita
Pinhasi, Ron
author_sort Cheronet, Olivia
collection PubMed
description Cranial sutures join the many bones of the skull. They are therefore points of weakness and consequently subjected to the many mechanical stresses affecting the cranium. However, the way in which this impacts their morphological complexity remains unclear. We examine the intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms of human sagittal sutures by quantifying the morphology from 107 individuals from archaeological populations spanning the Mesolithic to Middle ages, using standardized two‐dimensional photographs. Results show that the most important factor determining sutural complexity appears to be the position along the cranial vault from the junction with the coronal suture at its anterior‐most point to the junction with the lambdoid suture at its posterior‐most point. Conversely, factors such as age and lifeways show few trends in complexity, the most significant of which is a lower complexity in the sutures of Mesolithic individuals who consumed a tougher diet. The simple technique used in this study therefore allowed us to identify that, taken together, structural aspects play a more important role in defining the complexity of the human sagittal suture than extrinsic factors such as the mechanical forces imposed on the cranium by individuals' diet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92917492022-07-20 Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations Cheronet, Olivia Ash, Abigail Anders, Alexandra Dani, János Domboróczki, László Drozdova, Eva Francken, Michael Jovanovic, Marija Milasinovic, Lidija Pap, Ildiko Raczky, Pál Teschler‐Nicola, Maria Tvrdý, Zdeněk Wahl, Joachim Zariņa, Gunita Pinhasi, Ron Anat Rec (Hoboken) FULL LENGTH ARTICLES Cranial sutures join the many bones of the skull. They are therefore points of weakness and consequently subjected to the many mechanical stresses affecting the cranium. However, the way in which this impacts their morphological complexity remains unclear. We examine the intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms of human sagittal sutures by quantifying the morphology from 107 individuals from archaeological populations spanning the Mesolithic to Middle ages, using standardized two‐dimensional photographs. Results show that the most important factor determining sutural complexity appears to be the position along the cranial vault from the junction with the coronal suture at its anterior‐most point to the junction with the lambdoid suture at its posterior‐most point. Conversely, factors such as age and lifeways show few trends in complexity, the most significant of which is a lower complexity in the sutures of Mesolithic individuals who consumed a tougher diet. The simple technique used in this study therefore allowed us to identify that, taken together, structural aspects play a more important role in defining the complexity of the human sagittal suture than extrinsic factors such as the mechanical forces imposed on the cranium by individuals' diet. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-04-05 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9291749/ /pubmed/33773064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.24627 Text en © 2021 The Authors. The Anatomical Record published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for Anatomy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle FULL LENGTH ARTICLES
Cheronet, Olivia
Ash, Abigail
Anders, Alexandra
Dani, János
Domboróczki, László
Drozdova, Eva
Francken, Michael
Jovanovic, Marija
Milasinovic, Lidija
Pap, Ildiko
Raczky, Pál
Teschler‐Nicola, Maria
Tvrdý, Zdeněk
Wahl, Joachim
Zariņa, Gunita
Pinhasi, Ron
Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations
title Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations
title_full Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations
title_fullStr Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations
title_full_unstemmed Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations
title_short Sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations
title_sort sagittal suture morphological variation in human archaeological populations
topic FULL LENGTH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33773064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.24627
work_keys_str_mv AT cheronetolivia sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT ashabigail sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT andersalexandra sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT danijanos sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT domboroczkilaszlo sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT drozdovaeva sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT franckenmichael sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT jovanovicmarija sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT milasinoviclidija sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT papildiko sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT raczkypal sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT teschlernicolamaria sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT tvrdyzdenek sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT wahljoachim sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT zarinagunita sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations
AT pinhasiron sagittalsuturemorphologicalvariationinhumanarchaeologicalpopulations