Cargando…

Hard and soft tissue healing around implants with a modified implant neck configuration: An experimental in vivo preclinical investigation

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the dimensions and morphology of peri‐implant tissues around a modified dental implant designed with tissue level connection and a convergent transmucosal neck, when compared with a conventional bone level implant connected to a cylindrical machined titanium abutment. MATERIAL A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palombo, David, Rahmati, Maryam, Vignoletti, Fabio, Sanz‐Esporrin, Javier, Haugen, Håvard Jostein, Sanz, Mariano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34352137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13812
_version_ 1784749229325942784
author Palombo, David
Rahmati, Maryam
Vignoletti, Fabio
Sanz‐Esporrin, Javier
Haugen, Håvard Jostein
Sanz, Mariano
author_facet Palombo, David
Rahmati, Maryam
Vignoletti, Fabio
Sanz‐Esporrin, Javier
Haugen, Håvard Jostein
Sanz, Mariano
author_sort Palombo, David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the dimensions and morphology of peri‐implant tissues around a modified dental implant designed with tissue level connection and a convergent transmucosal neck, when compared with a conventional bone level implant connected to a cylindrical machined titanium abutment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight experimental animals were used for this in vivo investigation, in whom 16 test and 16 control implants were placed following a random allocation sequence. The following histological outcomes at 4 and 12 weeks were evaluated: morphology of peri‐implant tissues, the soft tissue height and thickness, the horizontal and vertical bone remodeling, and the bone to implant contact (BIC). RESULTS: In both early (4 weeks) and late (12 weeks) healing times, there were no statistically significant differences between test and control implants, with respect to the overall height and thickness of the peri‐implant hard and soft tissues. There was a tendency toward a more coronal free gingival margin (I‐FGM) at the buccal aspect of test when compared to control implants (at 4 weeks, difference of 0.97 mm (p = .572) and 0.30 mm (p = 1.000) at 12 weeks). Similarly, there was a tendency toward a more coronal position of the first bone to implant contact (I‐B) at the buccal aspect of test as compared to control implants (1.08 mm (p = 0.174) at 4 weeks and 0.83 mm (p = 0.724) at 12 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Hard and soft tissue healing occurred at both implant types with no statistically significant differences. Test implants tended to present a more coronal gingival margin (FGM) and first bone to implant contact (B).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92918552022-07-20 Hard and soft tissue healing around implants with a modified implant neck configuration: An experimental in vivo preclinical investigation Palombo, David Rahmati, Maryam Vignoletti, Fabio Sanz‐Esporrin, Javier Haugen, Håvard Jostein Sanz, Mariano Clin Oral Implants Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the dimensions and morphology of peri‐implant tissues around a modified dental implant designed with tissue level connection and a convergent transmucosal neck, when compared with a conventional bone level implant connected to a cylindrical machined titanium abutment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight experimental animals were used for this in vivo investigation, in whom 16 test and 16 control implants were placed following a random allocation sequence. The following histological outcomes at 4 and 12 weeks were evaluated: morphology of peri‐implant tissues, the soft tissue height and thickness, the horizontal and vertical bone remodeling, and the bone to implant contact (BIC). RESULTS: In both early (4 weeks) and late (12 weeks) healing times, there were no statistically significant differences between test and control implants, with respect to the overall height and thickness of the peri‐implant hard and soft tissues. There was a tendency toward a more coronal free gingival margin (I‐FGM) at the buccal aspect of test when compared to control implants (at 4 weeks, difference of 0.97 mm (p = .572) and 0.30 mm (p = 1.000) at 12 weeks). Similarly, there was a tendency toward a more coronal position of the first bone to implant contact (I‐B) at the buccal aspect of test as compared to control implants (1.08 mm (p = 0.174) at 4 weeks and 0.83 mm (p = 0.724) at 12 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Hard and soft tissue healing occurred at both implant types with no statistically significant differences. Test implants tended to present a more coronal gingival margin (FGM) and first bone to implant contact (B). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-21 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9291855/ /pubmed/34352137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13812 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Palombo, David
Rahmati, Maryam
Vignoletti, Fabio
Sanz‐Esporrin, Javier
Haugen, Håvard Jostein
Sanz, Mariano
Hard and soft tissue healing around implants with a modified implant neck configuration: An experimental in vivo preclinical investigation
title Hard and soft tissue healing around implants with a modified implant neck configuration: An experimental in vivo preclinical investigation
title_full Hard and soft tissue healing around implants with a modified implant neck configuration: An experimental in vivo preclinical investigation
title_fullStr Hard and soft tissue healing around implants with a modified implant neck configuration: An experimental in vivo preclinical investigation
title_full_unstemmed Hard and soft tissue healing around implants with a modified implant neck configuration: An experimental in vivo preclinical investigation
title_short Hard and soft tissue healing around implants with a modified implant neck configuration: An experimental in vivo preclinical investigation
title_sort hard and soft tissue healing around implants with a modified implant neck configuration: an experimental in vivo preclinical investigation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34352137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13812
work_keys_str_mv AT palombodavid hardandsofttissuehealingaroundimplantswithamodifiedimplantneckconfigurationanexperimentalinvivopreclinicalinvestigation
AT rahmatimaryam hardandsofttissuehealingaroundimplantswithamodifiedimplantneckconfigurationanexperimentalinvivopreclinicalinvestigation
AT vignolettifabio hardandsofttissuehealingaroundimplantswithamodifiedimplantneckconfigurationanexperimentalinvivopreclinicalinvestigation
AT sanzesporrinjavier hardandsofttissuehealingaroundimplantswithamodifiedimplantneckconfigurationanexperimentalinvivopreclinicalinvestigation
AT haugenhavardjostein hardandsofttissuehealingaroundimplantswithamodifiedimplantneckconfigurationanexperimentalinvivopreclinicalinvestigation
AT sanzmariano hardandsofttissuehealingaroundimplantswithamodifiedimplantneckconfigurationanexperimentalinvivopreclinicalinvestigation