Cargando…
Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether mind–body therapies are effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults, since at least one‐third of adults with cancer are affected by moderate or severe pain. METHODS: We searched for all randomized or quasi‐randomized controlled trials that included adults (≥18...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5821 |
_version_ | 1784749248274759680 |
---|---|
author | Danon, Nadia Al‐Gobari, Muaamar Burnand, Bernard Rodondi, Pierre‐Yves |
author_facet | Danon, Nadia Al‐Gobari, Muaamar Burnand, Bernard Rodondi, Pierre‐Yves |
author_sort | Danon, Nadia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess whether mind–body therapies are effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults, since at least one‐third of adults with cancer are affected by moderate or severe pain. METHODS: We searched for all randomized or quasi‐randomized controlled trials that included adults (≥18 years) with cancer‐related pain who were treated with mind–body therapies (mindfulness, hypnosis, yoga, guided imagery, and progressive muscle relaxation) in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Citation Index, Web of Science, trials registers, and reference lists. The primary outcome was pain intensity. We calculated the standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and assessed the risk of bias. RESULTS: We identified 40 primary studies involving a total of 3569 participants. The meta‐analysis included 24 studies (2404 participants) and showed a significant effect of −0.39 (95% CI −0.62 to −0.16) with considerable heterogeneity (I (2) = 86.3%, p < 0.001). After we excluded four “outlier” studies in sensitivity analyses, the effect size remained significant but weaker. There was a high risk of bias in all studies, for example, performance bias due to lack of participant blinding. Patients in multiple settings were included but many studies were of low quality. CONCLUSIONS: Mind–body therapies may be effective in improving cancer pain, but the quality of the evidence is low. There is a need for further high‐quality clinical trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9291932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92919322022-07-20 Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis Danon, Nadia Al‐Gobari, Muaamar Burnand, Bernard Rodondi, Pierre‐Yves Psychooncology Review OBJECTIVE: To assess whether mind–body therapies are effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults, since at least one‐third of adults with cancer are affected by moderate or severe pain. METHODS: We searched for all randomized or quasi‐randomized controlled trials that included adults (≥18 years) with cancer‐related pain who were treated with mind–body therapies (mindfulness, hypnosis, yoga, guided imagery, and progressive muscle relaxation) in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Citation Index, Web of Science, trials registers, and reference lists. The primary outcome was pain intensity. We calculated the standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and assessed the risk of bias. RESULTS: We identified 40 primary studies involving a total of 3569 participants. The meta‐analysis included 24 studies (2404 participants) and showed a significant effect of −0.39 (95% CI −0.62 to −0.16) with considerable heterogeneity (I (2) = 86.3%, p < 0.001). After we excluded four “outlier” studies in sensitivity analyses, the effect size remained significant but weaker. There was a high risk of bias in all studies, for example, performance bias due to lack of participant blinding. Patients in multiple settings were included but many studies were of low quality. CONCLUSIONS: Mind–body therapies may be effective in improving cancer pain, but the quality of the evidence is low. There is a need for further high‐quality clinical trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-21 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9291932/ /pubmed/34545984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5821 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Danon, Nadia Al‐Gobari, Muaamar Burnand, Bernard Rodondi, Pierre‐Yves Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5821 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danonnadia aremindbodytherapieseffectiveforrelievingcancerrelatedpaininadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT algobarimuaamar aremindbodytherapieseffectiveforrelievingcancerrelatedpaininadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT burnandbernard aremindbodytherapieseffectiveforrelievingcancerrelatedpaininadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rodondipierreyves aremindbodytherapieseffectiveforrelievingcancerrelatedpaininadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |