Cargando…

Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether mind–body therapies are effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults, since at least one‐third of adults with cancer are affected by moderate or severe pain. METHODS: We searched for all randomized or quasi‐randomized controlled trials that included adults (≥18...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Danon, Nadia, Al‐Gobari, Muaamar, Burnand, Bernard, Rodondi, Pierre‐Yves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5821
_version_ 1784749248274759680
author Danon, Nadia
Al‐Gobari, Muaamar
Burnand, Bernard
Rodondi, Pierre‐Yves
author_facet Danon, Nadia
Al‐Gobari, Muaamar
Burnand, Bernard
Rodondi, Pierre‐Yves
author_sort Danon, Nadia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess whether mind–body therapies are effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults, since at least one‐third of adults with cancer are affected by moderate or severe pain. METHODS: We searched for all randomized or quasi‐randomized controlled trials that included adults (≥18 years) with cancer‐related pain who were treated with mind–body therapies (mindfulness, hypnosis, yoga, guided imagery, and progressive muscle relaxation) in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Citation Index, Web of Science, trials registers, and reference lists. The primary outcome was pain intensity. We calculated the standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and assessed the risk of bias. RESULTS: We identified 40 primary studies involving a total of 3569 participants. The meta‐analysis included 24 studies (2404 participants) and showed a significant effect of −0.39 (95% CI −0.62 to −0.16) with considerable heterogeneity (I (2) = 86.3%, p < 0.001). After we excluded four “outlier” studies in sensitivity analyses, the effect size remained significant but weaker. There was a high risk of bias in all studies, for example, performance bias due to lack of participant blinding. Patients in multiple settings were included but many studies were of low quality. CONCLUSIONS: Mind–body therapies may be effective in improving cancer pain, but the quality of the evidence is low. There is a need for further high‐quality clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9291932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92919322022-07-20 Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis Danon, Nadia Al‐Gobari, Muaamar Burnand, Bernard Rodondi, Pierre‐Yves Psychooncology Review OBJECTIVE: To assess whether mind–body therapies are effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults, since at least one‐third of adults with cancer are affected by moderate or severe pain. METHODS: We searched for all randomized or quasi‐randomized controlled trials that included adults (≥18 years) with cancer‐related pain who were treated with mind–body therapies (mindfulness, hypnosis, yoga, guided imagery, and progressive muscle relaxation) in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Citation Index, Web of Science, trials registers, and reference lists. The primary outcome was pain intensity. We calculated the standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and assessed the risk of bias. RESULTS: We identified 40 primary studies involving a total of 3569 participants. The meta‐analysis included 24 studies (2404 participants) and showed a significant effect of −0.39 (95% CI −0.62 to −0.16) with considerable heterogeneity (I (2) = 86.3%, p < 0.001). After we excluded four “outlier” studies in sensitivity analyses, the effect size remained significant but weaker. There was a high risk of bias in all studies, for example, performance bias due to lack of participant blinding. Patients in multiple settings were included but many studies were of low quality. CONCLUSIONS: Mind–body therapies may be effective in improving cancer pain, but the quality of the evidence is low. There is a need for further high‐quality clinical trials. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-21 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9291932/ /pubmed/34545984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5821 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Psycho-Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review
Danon, Nadia
Al‐Gobari, Muaamar
Burnand, Bernard
Rodondi, Pierre‐Yves
Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort are mind–body therapies effective for relieving cancer‐related pain in adults? a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9291932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34545984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.5821
work_keys_str_mv AT danonnadia aremindbodytherapieseffectiveforrelievingcancerrelatedpaininadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT algobarimuaamar aremindbodytherapieseffectiveforrelievingcancerrelatedpaininadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT burnandbernard aremindbodytherapieseffectiveforrelievingcancerrelatedpaininadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rodondipierreyves aremindbodytherapieseffectiveforrelievingcancerrelatedpaininadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis