Cargando…

Individual patient data analysis of the BIOFLOW study program comparing safety and efficacy of a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus eluting stent to a durable polymer everolimus eluting stent

OBJECTIVES: This analysis of pooled individual patient data (IPD) aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus eluting stent system (BP‐SES; Orsiro) compared to a durable polymer everolimus eluting stent system (DP‐EES; Xience) in the pooled population as well as in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Toelg, Ralph, Slagboom, Ton, Waltenberger, Johannes, Lefèvre, Thierry, Saito, Shigeru, Kandzari, David E., Koolen, Jacques, Richardt, Gert
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:	Coronary Artery Disease
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32890442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29254

Ejemplares similares

Elastic stent recoil in coronary total occlusions: Comparison of durable‐polymer zotarolimus eluting stent and ultrathin strut bioabsorbable‐polymer sirolimus eluting stent
por: Improta, Riccardo, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of neointimal coverage between ultrathin biodegradable polymer‐coated sirolimus‐eluting stents and durable polymer‐coated everolimus‐eluting stents: 6 months optical coherence tomography follow‐up from the TAXCO study
por: Abhyankar, Atul, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Three‐year clinical outcome of biodegradable hybrid polymer Orsiro sirolimus‐eluting stent and the durable biocompatible polymer Resolute Integrity zotarolimus‐eluting stent: A randomized controlled trial
por: Kim, Soo‐Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of long‐term clinical outcomes in multivessel coronary artery disease patients treated either with bioresoarbable polymer sirolimus‐eluting stent or permanent polymer everolimus‐eluting stent: 5‐year results of the CENTURY II randomized clinical trial
por: Iñiguez, Andrés, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Five‐year angiographic, OCT and clinical outcomes of a randomized comparison of everolimus and biolimus‐eluting coronary stents with everolimus‐eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds
por: Schukraft, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Clinical outcome of biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with diabetes
por: Kakizaki, Ryota, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Impact of diabetes on clinical outcomes after revascularization with the dual therapy CD34 antibody‐covered sirolimus‐eluting Combo stent and the sirolimus‐eluting Orsiro stent
por: Jakobsen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Impact of acute coronary syndrome on clinical outcomes after revascularization with the dual‐therapy CD34 antibody‐covered sirolimus‐eluting Combo stent and the sirolimus‐eluting Orsiro stent
por: Jakobsen, Lars, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Safety and efficacy of Everolimus‐Eluting bioabsorbable Polymer‐Coated stent in patients with long coronary lesions: The EVOLVE 48 study
por: Karmpaliotis, Dimitrios, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Mechanical properties of the drug‐eluting bioresorbable magnesium scaffold compared with polymeric scaffolds and a permanent metallic drug‐eluting stent
por: Barkholt, Trine Ø., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

One‐year clinical outcomes of patients treated with polymer‐free amphilimus‐eluting stents or zotarolimus‐eluting stents: A propensity‐score adjusted analysis
por: Rozemeijer, Rik, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of 6‐month vascular healing response after bioresorbable polymer versus durable polymer drug‐eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndromes: A randomized serial optical coherence tomography study
por: Noguchi, Masahiko, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Biodegradable polymer-coated thin strut sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in the diabetic population
por: Gasior, Pawel, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Five‐Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus‐Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus‐Eluting Stents
por: Iglesias, Juan F., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study
por: Teeuwen, Koen, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Three‐year clinical outcomes of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold compared to Xience everolimus‐eluting stent in routine PCI in patients with diabetes mellitus—AIDA sub‐study
por: Kerkmeijer, Laura S.M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus conventional drug-eluting stents across time: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
por: Jackson-Smith, Elliot, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The relationship between re-endothelialization and endothelial function after DES implantation: Comparison between paclitaxcel eluting stent and zotarolims eluting stent
por: Murase, Suguru, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer-coated thin strut sirolimus-eluting stent vs. durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute myocardial infarction
por: Gąsior, Paweł, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus‐Eluting Stent Versus Durable‐Polymer Everolimus‐Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2‐Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial
por: Zbinden, Rainer, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting BioMatrix stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting Xience stents
por: Lee, Da Hyon, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cost‐effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with cobalt‐chromium everolimus eluting stents versus bare metal stents: Results from a patient level meta‐analysis of randomized trials
por: Ferko, Nicole, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Everolimus-eluting stents versus sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy
por: Hawranek, Michał, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Midterm Clinical Impacts of Biodegradable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents Compared with Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A 3-Year Propensity-Matched Study
por: Matsuda, Hiroaki, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting stents versus sirolimus-eluting stents and paclitaxel-eluting stents in diabetic patients
por: Ouyang, Hang, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cardiovascular outcomes associated with Ultrathin bioresorbable polymer sirolimus eluting stents versus thin, durable polymer everolimus eluting stents following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of published studies
por: Deng, Shibing, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial
por: Kuramitsu, Shoichi, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Mechanical properties of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold compared to the metallic everolimus-eluting stent
por: Dalos, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Randomized clinical trial comparing abluminal biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents: Nine months angiographic and 5-year clinical outcomes
por: Zhang, Haijun, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Two-Year Results of an Open-Label Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Stents and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents
por: Velders, Matthijs A., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Clinical results of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
por: Jafaripour, Iraj, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of the First Korean-made Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent with Abluminal Bioresorbable Polymer
por: Yang, Hyoung-Mo, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
por: Zhu, Ping, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Impact of Coronary Calcification on Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of Newer‐Generation Drug‐Eluting Stents
por: Hemetsberger, Rayyan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

An abluminal biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients undergoing coronary revascularization: 3-year clinical outcomes of a randomized non-inferiority trial
por: Zhang, Haijun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Succinobucol-Eluting Stents Increase Neointimal Thickening and Peri-Strut Inflammation in a Porcine Coronary Model
por: Watt, Jonathan, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Twelve-month comparative analysis of clinical outcomes using biodegradable polymer–coated everolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer–coated everolimus-eluting stents in all-comer patients
por: Abhyankar, Atul, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Correction: Two-Year Results of an Open-Label Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Stents and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents
por: Velders, Matthijs A., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Case series of coronary artery aneurysms after Everolimus eluting stent implantation and comparison with Sirolimus eluting stents
por: Sharma, Raghav, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable stent vs. durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the randomized ABSORB ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—TROFI II trial
por: Sabaté, Manel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_n3sb128ce23o6sa35kqd9igl02