Cargando…
How do People Judge Risk? Availability may Upstage Affect in the Construction of Risk Judgments
When making risk judgments, people rely on availability and affect as convenient heuristics. The two heuristics share many similarities and yet there have been no or few attempts to ascertain their causal impact on risk judgments. We present an experiment (N = 143) where we varied availability‐by‐re...
Autor principal: | Efendić, Emir |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292208/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.13729 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparing sentencing judgments of judges and laypeople: The role of justifications
por: Watamura, Eiichiro, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
How risk-prone are people when facing a sure loss? Negative interest rates as a convenient conceptual framework
por: Efendić, Emir, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
How I do it: judging appropriateness for TTE and TEE
por: Fonseca, Ricardo, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Adverse upgrading and/or upstaging in contemporary low-risk prostate cancer patients
por: Flammia, Rocco S., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Directionality in Aesthetic Judgments and Performance Evaluation: Sport Judges and Laypeople Compared
por: Loffing, Florian, et al.
Publicado: (2017)