Cargando…

Assessment of Liaison XL Murex Chagas diagnostic performance in blood screening for Chagas disease using a reference array of chimeric antigens

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease (CD) serological screening at blood banks is usually performed by a single highly sensitive serological assay, with chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIAs) being the method of choice. CLIAs employ recombinant, fusion peptides and/or chimeric antigens that selectively capture...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Emily F., Leony, Leonardo M., Silva, Ângelo A. O., Daltro, Ramona T., Freitas, Natália E. M., Vasconcelos, Larissa C. M., de Araújo, Fernando L. V., Celedon, Paola A. F., Krieger, Marco A., Zanchin, Nilson I. T., Santos, Fred L. N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34240750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/trf.16583
_version_ 1784749339211464704
author Santos, Emily F.
Leony, Leonardo M.
Silva, Ângelo A. O.
Daltro, Ramona T.
Freitas, Natália E. M.
Vasconcelos, Larissa C. M.
de Araújo, Fernando L. V.
Celedon, Paola A. F.
Krieger, Marco A.
Zanchin, Nilson I. T.
Santos, Fred L. N.
author_facet Santos, Emily F.
Leony, Leonardo M.
Silva, Ângelo A. O.
Daltro, Ramona T.
Freitas, Natália E. M.
Vasconcelos, Larissa C. M.
de Araújo, Fernando L. V.
Celedon, Paola A. F.
Krieger, Marco A.
Zanchin, Nilson I. T.
Santos, Fred L. N.
author_sort Santos, Emily F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chagas disease (CD) serological screening at blood banks is usually performed by a single highly sensitive serological assay, with chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIAs) being the method of choice. CLIAs employ recombinant, fusion peptides and/or chimeric antigens that selectively capture anti‐Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies. However, despite high sensitivity, the ability of these tests to identify CD‐positive cases should be evaluated against T. cruzi strains circulating in specific locales. Herein, we used a latent class analysis (LCA) approach employing an array of four chimeric antigens to assess the diagnostic performance of the Liaison XL Murex Chagas CLIA for the detection of anti‐T. cruzi IgG in serum samples. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included a panel of 5014 serum samples collected from volunteer blood donors at the Hematology and Hemotherapy Foundation of the State of Bahia, submitted to anti‐T. cruzi antibody detection using Liaison Chagas CLIA and LCA as a reference test in the absence of a gold standard. RESULTS: LCA classified 4993 samples as negative, while positivity for T. cruzi antibodies was predicted in 21 samples. Compared with LCA, CLIA demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 76.2% and 99.5%, respectively, providing an overall accuracy of 99.4%. DISCUSSION: In blood banks lacking a de facto highly sensitive screening immunoassay, the low sensitivity offered by Liaison Chagas CLIA renders it unsuitable for standalone use in serological screening procedures for CD. Moreover, blood banks are encouraged to carefully assess the ability of diagnostic methods to identify local T. cruzi strains in circulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92923092022-07-20 Assessment of Liaison XL Murex Chagas diagnostic performance in blood screening for Chagas disease using a reference array of chimeric antigens Santos, Emily F. Leony, Leonardo M. Silva, Ângelo A. O. Daltro, Ramona T. Freitas, Natália E. M. Vasconcelos, Larissa C. M. de Araújo, Fernando L. V. Celedon, Paola A. F. Krieger, Marco A. Zanchin, Nilson I. T. Santos, Fred L. N. Transfusion Donor Infectious Disease Testing BACKGROUND: Chagas disease (CD) serological screening at blood banks is usually performed by a single highly sensitive serological assay, with chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIAs) being the method of choice. CLIAs employ recombinant, fusion peptides and/or chimeric antigens that selectively capture anti‐Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies. However, despite high sensitivity, the ability of these tests to identify CD‐positive cases should be evaluated against T. cruzi strains circulating in specific locales. Herein, we used a latent class analysis (LCA) approach employing an array of four chimeric antigens to assess the diagnostic performance of the Liaison XL Murex Chagas CLIA for the detection of anti‐T. cruzi IgG in serum samples. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included a panel of 5014 serum samples collected from volunteer blood donors at the Hematology and Hemotherapy Foundation of the State of Bahia, submitted to anti‐T. cruzi antibody detection using Liaison Chagas CLIA and LCA as a reference test in the absence of a gold standard. RESULTS: LCA classified 4993 samples as negative, while positivity for T. cruzi antibodies was predicted in 21 samples. Compared with LCA, CLIA demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 76.2% and 99.5%, respectively, providing an overall accuracy of 99.4%. DISCUSSION: In blood banks lacking a de facto highly sensitive screening immunoassay, the low sensitivity offered by Liaison Chagas CLIA renders it unsuitable for standalone use in serological screening procedures for CD. Moreover, blood banks are encouraged to carefully assess the ability of diagnostic methods to identify local T. cruzi strains in circulation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-07-09 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9292309/ /pubmed/34240750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/trf.16583 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Transfusion published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AABB. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Donor Infectious Disease Testing
Santos, Emily F.
Leony, Leonardo M.
Silva, Ângelo A. O.
Daltro, Ramona T.
Freitas, Natália E. M.
Vasconcelos, Larissa C. M.
de Araújo, Fernando L. V.
Celedon, Paola A. F.
Krieger, Marco A.
Zanchin, Nilson I. T.
Santos, Fred L. N.
Assessment of Liaison XL Murex Chagas diagnostic performance in blood screening for Chagas disease using a reference array of chimeric antigens
title Assessment of Liaison XL Murex Chagas diagnostic performance in blood screening for Chagas disease using a reference array of chimeric antigens
title_full Assessment of Liaison XL Murex Chagas diagnostic performance in blood screening for Chagas disease using a reference array of chimeric antigens
title_fullStr Assessment of Liaison XL Murex Chagas diagnostic performance in blood screening for Chagas disease using a reference array of chimeric antigens
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Liaison XL Murex Chagas diagnostic performance in blood screening for Chagas disease using a reference array of chimeric antigens
title_short Assessment of Liaison XL Murex Chagas diagnostic performance in blood screening for Chagas disease using a reference array of chimeric antigens
title_sort assessment of liaison xl murex chagas diagnostic performance in blood screening for chagas disease using a reference array of chimeric antigens
topic Donor Infectious Disease Testing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34240750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/trf.16583
work_keys_str_mv AT santosemilyf assessmentofliaisonxlmurexchagasdiagnosticperformanceinbloodscreeningforchagasdiseaseusingareferencearrayofchimericantigens
AT leonyleonardom assessmentofliaisonxlmurexchagasdiagnosticperformanceinbloodscreeningforchagasdiseaseusingareferencearrayofchimericantigens
AT silvaangeloao assessmentofliaisonxlmurexchagasdiagnosticperformanceinbloodscreeningforchagasdiseaseusingareferencearrayofchimericantigens
AT daltroramonat assessmentofliaisonxlmurexchagasdiagnosticperformanceinbloodscreeningforchagasdiseaseusingareferencearrayofchimericantigens
AT freitasnataliaem assessmentofliaisonxlmurexchagasdiagnosticperformanceinbloodscreeningforchagasdiseaseusingareferencearrayofchimericantigens
AT vasconceloslarissacm assessmentofliaisonxlmurexchagasdiagnosticperformanceinbloodscreeningforchagasdiseaseusingareferencearrayofchimericantigens
AT dearaujofernandolv assessmentofliaisonxlmurexchagasdiagnosticperformanceinbloodscreeningforchagasdiseaseusingareferencearrayofchimericantigens
AT celedonpaolaaf assessmentofliaisonxlmurexchagasdiagnosticperformanceinbloodscreeningforchagasdiseaseusingareferencearrayofchimericantigens
AT kriegermarcoa assessmentofliaisonxlmurexchagasdiagnosticperformanceinbloodscreeningforchagasdiseaseusingareferencearrayofchimericantigens
AT zanchinnilsonit assessmentofliaisonxlmurexchagasdiagnosticperformanceinbloodscreeningforchagasdiseaseusingareferencearrayofchimericantigens
AT santosfredln assessmentofliaisonxlmurexchagasdiagnosticperformanceinbloodscreeningforchagasdiseaseusingareferencearrayofchimericantigens