A comparison of metal/metal and ceramic/metal taper‐trunnion modular connections in explanted total hip replacements

Corrosion and wear are commonly found at the taper‐trunnion connection of modular total hip arthroplasty (THA) explanted devices. While metal/metal (M/M) modular taper‐trunnion connections exhibit more wear/corrosion than ceramic/metal (C/M) modular taper‐trunnion connections, damage is present in both, regardless of material. This study used a combination of assessment techniques including clinical data, visual scoring assessment, optical imaging, profilometry, and x‐ray photoelectron microscopy (XPS), to investigate wear mechanisms and damage features at the modular taper‐trunnion connection of 10 M/M and 8 C/M explanted THAs. No correlation was found between any demographic variable and corrosion wear and assessment scores. All assessment techniques demonstrated that the stem trunnions had more damage than head tapers for both explant groups and agreed that C/M explants had less corrosion and wear compared to M/M explants. However, visual assessment scores differed between assessment techniques when evaluating the tapers and trunnions within the two groups. Profilometry showed an increase (p <.05) in surface roughness for stem trunnions compared to head tapers for both explant groups. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy performed on deposits from two M/M explants found chromium and molybdenum carbides beneath the surface while chromium sulfate and aged bone mineral were found on the surface suggesting that the debris is a result of corrosion rather than wear. These results indicate that taper‐trunnion damage is more prevalent for M/M explants, but C/M explants are still susceptible to damage. More comprehensive analysis of damage is necessary to better understand the origins of taper‐trunnion damage.