Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Population cancer screening rates are around 50% for the general population and even lower in rural areas. This study aimed to explore knowledge, attitudes, behaviours, motivators and barriers to breast, bowel and cervical screening participation in under‐screened men and women. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azar, Denise, Murphy, Michael, Fishman, Alana, Sewell, Lauren, Barnes, Megan, Proposch, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33713368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hpja.478
_version_ 1784749343601852416
author Azar, Denise
Murphy, Michael
Fishman, Alana
Sewell, Lauren
Barnes, Megan
Proposch, Amanda
author_facet Azar, Denise
Murphy, Michael
Fishman, Alana
Sewell, Lauren
Barnes, Megan
Proposch, Amanda
author_sort Azar, Denise
collection PubMed
description ISSUE ADDRESSED: Population cancer screening rates are around 50% for the general population and even lower in rural areas. This study aimed to explore knowledge, attitudes, behaviours, motivators and barriers to breast, bowel and cervical screening participation in under‐screened men and women. METHODS: We used a qualitative research design. Focus groups were segmented by age, sex and screening participation. Participants were under‐screened in at least one of the cancer screening programs, with separate groups for each of the programs. The discussion guides were designed around the Health Belief Model and group discussions were coded using a thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS: Fourteen focus groups were held with 80 participants. Key themes were that the concept of cancer screening was not well understood, a low priority for preventive health behaviours, issues relating to local general practitioners (GP) and screening was unpleasant, embarrassing and/or inconvenient. A key determinant of participation in cancer screening was exposure to prompts to action, and it was evident that participants often required multiple prompts before they took action. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities that develop attitudes to health that place disease prevention as a high priority; improve understanding of the benefit of screening in terms of early detection and treatment; improve GP availability and the patient‐practitioner relationship; and the development of messages for each of the screening programs should be further explored as factors that may influence rural population screening rates. SO WHAT? Addressing health attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, health practitioner and test‐related barriers and improving messaging may increase cancer screening participation in under‐screened rural populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92923282022-07-20 Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study Azar, Denise Murphy, Michael Fishman, Alana Sewell, Lauren Barnes, Megan Proposch, Amanda Health Promot J Austr Understanding Health Attitudes and Behaviours ISSUE ADDRESSED: Population cancer screening rates are around 50% for the general population and even lower in rural areas. This study aimed to explore knowledge, attitudes, behaviours, motivators and barriers to breast, bowel and cervical screening participation in under‐screened men and women. METHODS: We used a qualitative research design. Focus groups were segmented by age, sex and screening participation. Participants were under‐screened in at least one of the cancer screening programs, with separate groups for each of the programs. The discussion guides were designed around the Health Belief Model and group discussions were coded using a thematic content analysis approach. RESULTS: Fourteen focus groups were held with 80 participants. Key themes were that the concept of cancer screening was not well understood, a low priority for preventive health behaviours, issues relating to local general practitioners (GP) and screening was unpleasant, embarrassing and/or inconvenient. A key determinant of participation in cancer screening was exposure to prompts to action, and it was evident that participants often required multiple prompts before they took action. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities that develop attitudes to health that place disease prevention as a high priority; improve understanding of the benefit of screening in terms of early detection and treatment; improve GP availability and the patient‐practitioner relationship; and the development of messages for each of the screening programs should be further explored as factors that may influence rural population screening rates. SO WHAT? Addressing health attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, health practitioner and test‐related barriers and improving messaging may increase cancer screening participation in under‐screened rural populations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-27 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9292328/ /pubmed/33713368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hpja.478 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Promotion Journal of Australia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Health Promotion Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Understanding Health Attitudes and Behaviours
Azar, Denise
Murphy, Michael
Fishman, Alana
Sewell, Lauren
Barnes, Megan
Proposch, Amanda
Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study
title Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study
title_full Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study
title_short Barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural Victoria: A qualitative study
title_sort barriers and facilitators to participation in breast, bowel and cervical cancer screening in rural victoria: a qualitative study
topic Understanding Health Attitudes and Behaviours
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33713368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hpja.478
work_keys_str_mv AT azardenise barriersandfacilitatorstoparticipationinbreastbowelandcervicalcancerscreeninginruralvictoriaaqualitativestudy
AT murphymichael barriersandfacilitatorstoparticipationinbreastbowelandcervicalcancerscreeninginruralvictoriaaqualitativestudy
AT fishmanalana barriersandfacilitatorstoparticipationinbreastbowelandcervicalcancerscreeninginruralvictoriaaqualitativestudy
AT sewelllauren barriersandfacilitatorstoparticipationinbreastbowelandcervicalcancerscreeninginruralvictoriaaqualitativestudy
AT barnesmegan barriersandfacilitatorstoparticipationinbreastbowelandcervicalcancerscreeninginruralvictoriaaqualitativestudy
AT proposchamanda barriersandfacilitatorstoparticipationinbreastbowelandcervicalcancerscreeninginruralvictoriaaqualitativestudy