Cargando…

Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects

Research has shown that a home‐based educational intervention for patients with chronic kidney disease results in better knowledge and communication, and more living donor kidney transplantations (LDKT). Implementation research in the field of renal care is almost nonexistent. The aims of this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Redeker, Steef, Massey, Emma K., Boonstra, Charlotte, van Busschbach, Jan J., Timman, Reinier, Brulez, Harald F. H., Hollander, Daan A. A. M. J., Hilbrands, Luuk B., Bemelman, Frederike, Berger, Stefan P., van de Wetering, Jacqueline, van den Dorpel, René M. A., Dekker‐Jansen, Margriet, Weimar, Willem, Ismail, Sohal Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.14011
_version_ 1784749361221074944
author Redeker, Steef
Massey, Emma K.
Boonstra, Charlotte
van Busschbach, Jan J.
Timman, Reinier
Brulez, Harald F. H.
Hollander, Daan A. A. M. J.
Hilbrands, Luuk B.
Bemelman, Frederike
Berger, Stefan P.
van de Wetering, Jacqueline
van den Dorpel, René M. A.
Dekker‐Jansen, Margriet
Weimar, Willem
Ismail, Sohal Y.
author_facet Redeker, Steef
Massey, Emma K.
Boonstra, Charlotte
van Busschbach, Jan J.
Timman, Reinier
Brulez, Harald F. H.
Hollander, Daan A. A. M. J.
Hilbrands, Luuk B.
Bemelman, Frederike
Berger, Stefan P.
van de Wetering, Jacqueline
van den Dorpel, René M. A.
Dekker‐Jansen, Margriet
Weimar, Willem
Ismail, Sohal Y.
author_sort Redeker, Steef
collection PubMed
description Research has shown that a home‐based educational intervention for patients with chronic kidney disease results in better knowledge and communication, and more living donor kidney transplantations (LDKT). Implementation research in the field of renal care is almost nonexistent. The aims of this study were (1) to demonstrate generalizability, (2) evaluate the implementation process, and (3) to assess the relationship of intervention effects on LDKT‐activity. Eight hospitals participated in the project. Patients eligible for all kidney replacement therapies (KRT) were invited to participate. Effect outcomes were KRT‐knowledge and KRT‐communication, and treatment choice. Feasibility, fidelity, and intervention costs were assessed as part of the process evaluation. Three hundred and thirty‐two patients completed the intervention. There was a significant increase in KRT‐knowledge and KRT‐communication among participants. One hundred and twenty‐nine out of 332 patients (39%) had LDKT‐activity, which was in line with the results of the clinical trials. Protocol adherence, knowledge, and age were correlated with LDKT‐activity. This unique implementation study shows that the results in practice are comparable to the previous trials, and show that the intervention can be implemented, while maintaining quality. Results from the project resulted in the uptake of the intervention in standard care. We urge other countries to investigate the uptake of the intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92924012022-07-20 Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects Redeker, Steef Massey, Emma K. Boonstra, Charlotte van Busschbach, Jan J. Timman, Reinier Brulez, Harald F. H. Hollander, Daan A. A. M. J. Hilbrands, Luuk B. Bemelman, Frederike Berger, Stefan P. van de Wetering, Jacqueline van den Dorpel, René M. A. Dekker‐Jansen, Margriet Weimar, Willem Ismail, Sohal Y. Transpl Int Original Articles Research has shown that a home‐based educational intervention for patients with chronic kidney disease results in better knowledge and communication, and more living donor kidney transplantations (LDKT). Implementation research in the field of renal care is almost nonexistent. The aims of this study were (1) to demonstrate generalizability, (2) evaluate the implementation process, and (3) to assess the relationship of intervention effects on LDKT‐activity. Eight hospitals participated in the project. Patients eligible for all kidney replacement therapies (KRT) were invited to participate. Effect outcomes were KRT‐knowledge and KRT‐communication, and treatment choice. Feasibility, fidelity, and intervention costs were assessed as part of the process evaluation. Three hundred and thirty‐two patients completed the intervention. There was a significant increase in KRT‐knowledge and KRT‐communication among participants. One hundred and twenty‐nine out of 332 patients (39%) had LDKT‐activity, which was in line with the results of the clinical trials. Protocol adherence, knowledge, and age were correlated with LDKT‐activity. This unique implementation study shows that the results in practice are comparable to the previous trials, and show that the intervention can be implemented, while maintaining quality. Results from the project resulted in the uptake of the intervention in standard care. We urge other countries to investigate the uptake of the intervention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-21 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9292401/ /pubmed/34390041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.14011 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Redeker, Steef
Massey, Emma K.
Boonstra, Charlotte
van Busschbach, Jan J.
Timman, Reinier
Brulez, Harald F. H.
Hollander, Daan A. A. M. J.
Hilbrands, Luuk B.
Bemelman, Frederike
Berger, Stefan P.
van de Wetering, Jacqueline
van den Dorpel, René M. A.
Dekker‐Jansen, Margriet
Weimar, Willem
Ismail, Sohal Y.
Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects
title Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects
title_full Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects
title_fullStr Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects
title_short Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects
title_sort implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.14011
work_keys_str_mv AT redekersteef implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT masseyemmak implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT boonstracharlotte implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT vanbusschbachjanj implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT timmanreinier implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT brulezharaldfh implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT hollanderdaanaamj implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT hilbrandsluukb implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT bemelmanfrederike implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT bergerstefanp implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT vandeweteringjacqueline implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT vandendorpelrenema implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT dekkerjansenmargriet implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT weimarwillem implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT ismailsohaly implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects
AT implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects