Cargando…
Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects
Research has shown that a home‐based educational intervention for patients with chronic kidney disease results in better knowledge and communication, and more living donor kidney transplantations (LDKT). Implementation research in the field of renal care is almost nonexistent. The aims of this study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.14011 |
_version_ | 1784749361221074944 |
---|---|
author | Redeker, Steef Massey, Emma K. Boonstra, Charlotte van Busschbach, Jan J. Timman, Reinier Brulez, Harald F. H. Hollander, Daan A. A. M. J. Hilbrands, Luuk B. Bemelman, Frederike Berger, Stefan P. van de Wetering, Jacqueline van den Dorpel, René M. A. Dekker‐Jansen, Margriet Weimar, Willem Ismail, Sohal Y. |
author_facet | Redeker, Steef Massey, Emma K. Boonstra, Charlotte van Busschbach, Jan J. Timman, Reinier Brulez, Harald F. H. Hollander, Daan A. A. M. J. Hilbrands, Luuk B. Bemelman, Frederike Berger, Stefan P. van de Wetering, Jacqueline van den Dorpel, René M. A. Dekker‐Jansen, Margriet Weimar, Willem Ismail, Sohal Y. |
author_sort | Redeker, Steef |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research has shown that a home‐based educational intervention for patients with chronic kidney disease results in better knowledge and communication, and more living donor kidney transplantations (LDKT). Implementation research in the field of renal care is almost nonexistent. The aims of this study were (1) to demonstrate generalizability, (2) evaluate the implementation process, and (3) to assess the relationship of intervention effects on LDKT‐activity. Eight hospitals participated in the project. Patients eligible for all kidney replacement therapies (KRT) were invited to participate. Effect outcomes were KRT‐knowledge and KRT‐communication, and treatment choice. Feasibility, fidelity, and intervention costs were assessed as part of the process evaluation. Three hundred and thirty‐two patients completed the intervention. There was a significant increase in KRT‐knowledge and KRT‐communication among participants. One hundred and twenty‐nine out of 332 patients (39%) had LDKT‐activity, which was in line with the results of the clinical trials. Protocol adherence, knowledge, and age were correlated with LDKT‐activity. This unique implementation study shows that the results in practice are comparable to the previous trials, and show that the intervention can be implemented, while maintaining quality. Results from the project resulted in the uptake of the intervention in standard care. We urge other countries to investigate the uptake of the intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9292401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92924012022-07-20 Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects Redeker, Steef Massey, Emma K. Boonstra, Charlotte van Busschbach, Jan J. Timman, Reinier Brulez, Harald F. H. Hollander, Daan A. A. M. J. Hilbrands, Luuk B. Bemelman, Frederike Berger, Stefan P. van de Wetering, Jacqueline van den Dorpel, René M. A. Dekker‐Jansen, Margriet Weimar, Willem Ismail, Sohal Y. Transpl Int Original Articles Research has shown that a home‐based educational intervention for patients with chronic kidney disease results in better knowledge and communication, and more living donor kidney transplantations (LDKT). Implementation research in the field of renal care is almost nonexistent. The aims of this study were (1) to demonstrate generalizability, (2) evaluate the implementation process, and (3) to assess the relationship of intervention effects on LDKT‐activity. Eight hospitals participated in the project. Patients eligible for all kidney replacement therapies (KRT) were invited to participate. Effect outcomes were KRT‐knowledge and KRT‐communication, and treatment choice. Feasibility, fidelity, and intervention costs were assessed as part of the process evaluation. Three hundred and thirty‐two patients completed the intervention. There was a significant increase in KRT‐knowledge and KRT‐communication among participants. One hundred and twenty‐nine out of 332 patients (39%) had LDKT‐activity, which was in line with the results of the clinical trials. Protocol adherence, knowledge, and age were correlated with LDKT‐activity. This unique implementation study shows that the results in practice are comparable to the previous trials, and show that the intervention can be implemented, while maintaining quality. Results from the project resulted in the uptake of the intervention in standard care. We urge other countries to investigate the uptake of the intervention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-21 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9292401/ /pubmed/34390041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.14011 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Redeker, Steef Massey, Emma K. Boonstra, Charlotte van Busschbach, Jan J. Timman, Reinier Brulez, Harald F. H. Hollander, Daan A. A. M. J. Hilbrands, Luuk B. Bemelman, Frederike Berger, Stefan P. van de Wetering, Jacqueline van den Dorpel, René M. A. Dekker‐Jansen, Margriet Weimar, Willem Ismail, Sohal Y. Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects |
title | Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects |
title_full | Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects |
title_fullStr | Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects |
title_short | Implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: Evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects |
title_sort | implementation of the kidney team at home intervention: evaluating generalizability, implementation process, and effects |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.14011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT redekersteef implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT masseyemmak implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT boonstracharlotte implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT vanbusschbachjanj implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT timmanreinier implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT brulezharaldfh implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT hollanderdaanaamj implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT hilbrandsluukb implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT bemelmanfrederike implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT bergerstefanp implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT vandeweteringjacqueline implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT vandendorpelrenema implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT dekkerjansenmargriet implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT weimarwillem implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT ismailsohaly implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects AT implementationofthekidneyteamathomeinterventionevaluatinggeneralizabilityimplementationprocessandeffects |