Cargando…

Contrasting effects of soil microbial interactions on growth–defence relationships between early‐ and mid‐successional plant communities

Plants allocate resources to processes related to growth and enemy defence. Simultaneously, they interact with complex soil microbiomes that also affect plant performance. While the influence of individual microbial groups on single plants is increasingly studied, effects of microbial interactions o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geisen, Stefan, Heinen, Robin, Andreou, Elena, van Lent, Teun, ten Hooven, Freddy C., Thakur, Madhav P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34242435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.17609
_version_ 1784749385177890816
author Geisen, Stefan
Heinen, Robin
Andreou, Elena
van Lent, Teun
ten Hooven, Freddy C.
Thakur, Madhav P.
author_facet Geisen, Stefan
Heinen, Robin
Andreou, Elena
van Lent, Teun
ten Hooven, Freddy C.
Thakur, Madhav P.
author_sort Geisen, Stefan
collection PubMed
description Plants allocate resources to processes related to growth and enemy defence. Simultaneously, they interact with complex soil microbiomes that also affect plant performance. While the influence of individual microbial groups on single plants is increasingly studied, effects of microbial interactions on growth, defence and growth–defence relationships remain unknown, especially at the plant community level. We investigated how three microbial groups (bacteria, fungi, protists), alone and in full‐factorial combinations, affect plant performance and potential growth–defence relationships by measuring phenolics composition in early‐ and mid‐successional grass and forb communities in a glasshouse experiment. Microbial groups did not affect plant growth and only fungi increased defence compounds in early‐ and mid‐successional forbs, while grasses were not affected. Shoot biomass–defence relationships were negatively correlated in most microbial treatments in early‐successional forbs, but positively in several microbial treatments in mid‐successional forbs. The growth–defence relationship was generally negative in early‐successional but not in mid‐successional grasses. The presence of different microbiomes commonly removed the observed growth–defence relationships. We conclude that soil microorganisms and their interactions can shift growth–defence relationships differentially for plant functional groups and the relationships vary between successional stages. Microbial interaction‐induced growth–defence shifts might therefore underlie distinct plant strategies and fitness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92924982022-07-20 Contrasting effects of soil microbial interactions on growth–defence relationships between early‐ and mid‐successional plant communities Geisen, Stefan Heinen, Robin Andreou, Elena van Lent, Teun ten Hooven, Freddy C. Thakur, Madhav P. New Phytol Research Plants allocate resources to processes related to growth and enemy defence. Simultaneously, they interact with complex soil microbiomes that also affect plant performance. While the influence of individual microbial groups on single plants is increasingly studied, effects of microbial interactions on growth, defence and growth–defence relationships remain unknown, especially at the plant community level. We investigated how three microbial groups (bacteria, fungi, protists), alone and in full‐factorial combinations, affect plant performance and potential growth–defence relationships by measuring phenolics composition in early‐ and mid‐successional grass and forb communities in a glasshouse experiment. Microbial groups did not affect plant growth and only fungi increased defence compounds in early‐ and mid‐successional forbs, while grasses were not affected. Shoot biomass–defence relationships were negatively correlated in most microbial treatments in early‐successional forbs, but positively in several microbial treatments in mid‐successional forbs. The growth–defence relationship was generally negative in early‐successional but not in mid‐successional grasses. The presence of different microbiomes commonly removed the observed growth–defence relationships. We conclude that soil microorganisms and their interactions can shift growth–defence relationships differentially for plant functional groups and the relationships vary between successional stages. Microbial interaction‐induced growth–defence shifts might therefore underlie distinct plant strategies and fitness. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-19 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9292498/ /pubmed/34242435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.17609 Text en © 2021 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2021 New Phytologist Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Geisen, Stefan
Heinen, Robin
Andreou, Elena
van Lent, Teun
ten Hooven, Freddy C.
Thakur, Madhav P.
Contrasting effects of soil microbial interactions on growth–defence relationships between early‐ and mid‐successional plant communities
title Contrasting effects of soil microbial interactions on growth–defence relationships between early‐ and mid‐successional plant communities
title_full Contrasting effects of soil microbial interactions on growth–defence relationships between early‐ and mid‐successional plant communities
title_fullStr Contrasting effects of soil microbial interactions on growth–defence relationships between early‐ and mid‐successional plant communities
title_full_unstemmed Contrasting effects of soil microbial interactions on growth–defence relationships between early‐ and mid‐successional plant communities
title_short Contrasting effects of soil microbial interactions on growth–defence relationships between early‐ and mid‐successional plant communities
title_sort contrasting effects of soil microbial interactions on growth–defence relationships between early‐ and mid‐successional plant communities
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34242435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.17609
work_keys_str_mv AT geisenstefan contrastingeffectsofsoilmicrobialinteractionsongrowthdefencerelationshipsbetweenearlyandmidsuccessionalplantcommunities
AT heinenrobin contrastingeffectsofsoilmicrobialinteractionsongrowthdefencerelationshipsbetweenearlyandmidsuccessionalplantcommunities
AT andreouelena contrastingeffectsofsoilmicrobialinteractionsongrowthdefencerelationshipsbetweenearlyandmidsuccessionalplantcommunities
AT vanlentteun contrastingeffectsofsoilmicrobialinteractionsongrowthdefencerelationshipsbetweenearlyandmidsuccessionalplantcommunities
AT tenhoovenfreddyc contrastingeffectsofsoilmicrobialinteractionsongrowthdefencerelationshipsbetweenearlyandmidsuccessionalplantcommunities
AT thakurmadhavp contrastingeffectsofsoilmicrobialinteractionsongrowthdefencerelationshipsbetweenearlyandmidsuccessionalplantcommunities