Cargando…

Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Although robotics has been shown to improve outcomes in some high‐difficulty surgical category patients, it is unclear if such an approach may improve outcomes in elderly patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). OBJECTIVE: To compare robotic and laparotomic surgery in the treatment and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raffone, Antonio, Travaglino, Antonio, Raimondo, Diego, Boccia, Dominga, Vetrella, Martino, Verrazzo, Paolo, Granata, Marcello, Casadio, Paolo, Insabato, Luigi, Mollo, Antonio, Seracchioli, Renato
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13766
_version_ 1784749389535772672
author Raffone, Antonio
Travaglino, Antonio
Raimondo, Diego
Boccia, Dominga
Vetrella, Martino
Verrazzo, Paolo
Granata, Marcello
Casadio, Paolo
Insabato, Luigi
Mollo, Antonio
Seracchioli, Renato
author_facet Raffone, Antonio
Travaglino, Antonio
Raimondo, Diego
Boccia, Dominga
Vetrella, Martino
Verrazzo, Paolo
Granata, Marcello
Casadio, Paolo
Insabato, Luigi
Mollo, Antonio
Seracchioli, Renato
author_sort Raffone, Antonio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although robotics has been shown to improve outcomes in some high‐difficulty surgical category patients, it is unclear if such an approach may improve outcomes in elderly patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). OBJECTIVE: To compare robotic and laparotomic surgery in the treatment and staging of elderly EC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta‐analysis was performed assessing the risk of overall, intra‐operative, and peri‐operative complications associated with the surgical approach (laparotomic vs robotic) for elderly patients with EC by relative risk (RR). Pooled means ± standard deviation of length of stay were compared with the unpaired t test. Subgroup analyses for overall complications were performed based on different age cut‐offs (>70, >65, and >75 years) and severity of complications (minor and major). A value of P less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Five studies with 7629 EC patients were included. Pooled RR for robotic compared with laparotomic surgery was 0.40 (P < 0.001) for overall, 0.46 (P = 0.18) for intra‐operative, and 0.43 (P < 0.001) for peri‐operative complications. Pooled difference between means ± standard deviation of length of stay for robotic versus laparotomic surgery was −3.34 (P < 0.001). At subgroup analyses, pooled RR of overall complications for robotic surgery versus laparotomic surgery was 0.34 (P < 0.001) in the >70 years, 0.51 (P < 0.01) in the >65 years, 0.20 (P = 0.12) in the >75 years groups. Pooled RR was 0.50 (P = 0.1) in the minor complications subgroup, and 0.42 (P = 0.002) in the major complications subgroup. CONCLUSION: Robotics might be a viable alternative to the laparotomic approach for EC in elderly patients because it significantly decreases the risk of overall and peri‐operative complications (mainly major complications), and the length of stay when compared with laparotomy. The decrease in risk of overall complications is greater with increasing patient age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92925142022-07-20 Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Raffone, Antonio Travaglino, Antonio Raimondo, Diego Boccia, Dominga Vetrella, Martino Verrazzo, Paolo Granata, Marcello Casadio, Paolo Insabato, Luigi Mollo, Antonio Seracchioli, Renato Int J Gynaecol Obstet Review Articles BACKGROUND: Although robotics has been shown to improve outcomes in some high‐difficulty surgical category patients, it is unclear if such an approach may improve outcomes in elderly patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). OBJECTIVE: To compare robotic and laparotomic surgery in the treatment and staging of elderly EC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta‐analysis was performed assessing the risk of overall, intra‐operative, and peri‐operative complications associated with the surgical approach (laparotomic vs robotic) for elderly patients with EC by relative risk (RR). Pooled means ± standard deviation of length of stay were compared with the unpaired t test. Subgroup analyses for overall complications were performed based on different age cut‐offs (>70, >65, and >75 years) and severity of complications (minor and major). A value of P less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Five studies with 7629 EC patients were included. Pooled RR for robotic compared with laparotomic surgery was 0.40 (P < 0.001) for overall, 0.46 (P = 0.18) for intra‐operative, and 0.43 (P < 0.001) for peri‐operative complications. Pooled difference between means ± standard deviation of length of stay for robotic versus laparotomic surgery was −3.34 (P < 0.001). At subgroup analyses, pooled RR of overall complications for robotic surgery versus laparotomic surgery was 0.34 (P < 0.001) in the >70 years, 0.51 (P < 0.01) in the >65 years, 0.20 (P = 0.12) in the >75 years groups. Pooled RR was 0.50 (P = 0.1) in the minor complications subgroup, and 0.42 (P = 0.002) in the major complications subgroup. CONCLUSION: Robotics might be a viable alternative to the laparotomic approach for EC in elderly patients because it significantly decreases the risk of overall and peri‐operative complications (mainly major complications), and the length of stay when compared with laparotomy. The decrease in risk of overall complications is greater with increasing patient age. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-19 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9292514/ /pubmed/34043235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13766 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Raffone, Antonio
Travaglino, Antonio
Raimondo, Diego
Boccia, Dominga
Vetrella, Martino
Verrazzo, Paolo
Granata, Marcello
Casadio, Paolo
Insabato, Luigi
Mollo, Antonio
Seracchioli, Renato
Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13766
work_keys_str_mv AT raffoneantonio laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT travaglinoantonio laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT raimondodiego laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bocciadominga laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vetrellamartino laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT verrazzopaolo laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT granatamarcello laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT casadiopaolo laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT insabatoluigi laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT molloantonio laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT seracchiolirenato laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis