Cargando…
Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
BACKGROUND: Although robotics has been shown to improve outcomes in some high‐difficulty surgical category patients, it is unclear if such an approach may improve outcomes in elderly patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). OBJECTIVE: To compare robotic and laparotomic surgery in the treatment and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13766 |
_version_ | 1784749389535772672 |
---|---|
author | Raffone, Antonio Travaglino, Antonio Raimondo, Diego Boccia, Dominga Vetrella, Martino Verrazzo, Paolo Granata, Marcello Casadio, Paolo Insabato, Luigi Mollo, Antonio Seracchioli, Renato |
author_facet | Raffone, Antonio Travaglino, Antonio Raimondo, Diego Boccia, Dominga Vetrella, Martino Verrazzo, Paolo Granata, Marcello Casadio, Paolo Insabato, Luigi Mollo, Antonio Seracchioli, Renato |
author_sort | Raffone, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although robotics has been shown to improve outcomes in some high‐difficulty surgical category patients, it is unclear if such an approach may improve outcomes in elderly patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). OBJECTIVE: To compare robotic and laparotomic surgery in the treatment and staging of elderly EC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta‐analysis was performed assessing the risk of overall, intra‐operative, and peri‐operative complications associated with the surgical approach (laparotomic vs robotic) for elderly patients with EC by relative risk (RR). Pooled means ± standard deviation of length of stay were compared with the unpaired t test. Subgroup analyses for overall complications were performed based on different age cut‐offs (>70, >65, and >75 years) and severity of complications (minor and major). A value of P less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Five studies with 7629 EC patients were included. Pooled RR for robotic compared with laparotomic surgery was 0.40 (P < 0.001) for overall, 0.46 (P = 0.18) for intra‐operative, and 0.43 (P < 0.001) for peri‐operative complications. Pooled difference between means ± standard deviation of length of stay for robotic versus laparotomic surgery was −3.34 (P < 0.001). At subgroup analyses, pooled RR of overall complications for robotic surgery versus laparotomic surgery was 0.34 (P < 0.001) in the >70 years, 0.51 (P < 0.01) in the >65 years, 0.20 (P = 0.12) in the >75 years groups. Pooled RR was 0.50 (P = 0.1) in the minor complications subgroup, and 0.42 (P = 0.002) in the major complications subgroup. CONCLUSION: Robotics might be a viable alternative to the laparotomic approach for EC in elderly patients because it significantly decreases the risk of overall and peri‐operative complications (mainly major complications), and the length of stay when compared with laparotomy. The decrease in risk of overall complications is greater with increasing patient age. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9292514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92925142022-07-20 Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Raffone, Antonio Travaglino, Antonio Raimondo, Diego Boccia, Dominga Vetrella, Martino Verrazzo, Paolo Granata, Marcello Casadio, Paolo Insabato, Luigi Mollo, Antonio Seracchioli, Renato Int J Gynaecol Obstet Review Articles BACKGROUND: Although robotics has been shown to improve outcomes in some high‐difficulty surgical category patients, it is unclear if such an approach may improve outcomes in elderly patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). OBJECTIVE: To compare robotic and laparotomic surgery in the treatment and staging of elderly EC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta‐analysis was performed assessing the risk of overall, intra‐operative, and peri‐operative complications associated with the surgical approach (laparotomic vs robotic) for elderly patients with EC by relative risk (RR). Pooled means ± standard deviation of length of stay were compared with the unpaired t test. Subgroup analyses for overall complications were performed based on different age cut‐offs (>70, >65, and >75 years) and severity of complications (minor and major). A value of P less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Five studies with 7629 EC patients were included. Pooled RR for robotic compared with laparotomic surgery was 0.40 (P < 0.001) for overall, 0.46 (P = 0.18) for intra‐operative, and 0.43 (P < 0.001) for peri‐operative complications. Pooled difference between means ± standard deviation of length of stay for robotic versus laparotomic surgery was −3.34 (P < 0.001). At subgroup analyses, pooled RR of overall complications for robotic surgery versus laparotomic surgery was 0.34 (P < 0.001) in the >70 years, 0.51 (P < 0.01) in the >65 years, 0.20 (P = 0.12) in the >75 years groups. Pooled RR was 0.50 (P = 0.1) in the minor complications subgroup, and 0.42 (P = 0.002) in the major complications subgroup. CONCLUSION: Robotics might be a viable alternative to the laparotomic approach for EC in elderly patients because it significantly decreases the risk of overall and peri‐operative complications (mainly major complications), and the length of stay when compared with laparotomy. The decrease in risk of overall complications is greater with increasing patient age. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-19 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9292514/ /pubmed/34043235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13766 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Raffone, Antonio Travaglino, Antonio Raimondo, Diego Boccia, Dominga Vetrella, Martino Verrazzo, Paolo Granata, Marcello Casadio, Paolo Insabato, Luigi Mollo, Antonio Seracchioli, Renato Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | Laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | laparotomic versus robotic surgery in elderly patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34043235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13766 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raffoneantonio laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT travaglinoantonio laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT raimondodiego laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bocciadominga laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vetrellamartino laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT verrazzopaolo laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT granatamarcello laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT casadiopaolo laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT insabatoluigi laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT molloantonio laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT seracchiolirenato laparotomicversusroboticsurgeryinelderlypatientswithendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |