Cargando…
Comparing definitions of data and information in data protection law and machine learning: A useful way forward to meaningfully regulate algorithms?
The notion of information is central to data protection law, and to algorithms/machine learning. This centrality gives the impressions that algorithms are just yet another data processing operation to be regulated. A more careful analysis reveals a number of issues. The notion of personal data is no...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12349 |
_version_ | 1784749392371122176 |
---|---|
author | Gellert, Raphaël |
author_facet | Gellert, Raphaël |
author_sort | Gellert, Raphaël |
collection | PubMed |
description | The notion of information is central to data protection law, and to algorithms/machine learning. This centrality gives the impressions that algorithms are just yet another data processing operation to be regulated. A more careful analysis reveals a number of issues. The notion of personal data is notoriously under‐defined, and attempts at clarification from an information theory perspective are also equivocal. The paper therefore attempts a clarification of the meaning of data and information in the context of information theory, which it uses in order to clarify the notion of personal data. In doing so, it shows that data protection law is grounded in the logic of knowledge communication, which stands in stark contrast with machine learning, which is predicated upon the logic of knowledge production, and hence, upon different definitions of data and information. This is what ultimately explains the failure of data protection to adequately regulate machine learning algorithms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9292525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92925252022-07-20 Comparing definitions of data and information in data protection law and machine learning: A useful way forward to meaningfully regulate algorithms? Gellert, Raphaël Regul Gov Special Issue: Algorithmic Regulation The notion of information is central to data protection law, and to algorithms/machine learning. This centrality gives the impressions that algorithms are just yet another data processing operation to be regulated. A more careful analysis reveals a number of issues. The notion of personal data is notoriously under‐defined, and attempts at clarification from an information theory perspective are also equivocal. The paper therefore attempts a clarification of the meaning of data and information in the context of information theory, which it uses in order to clarify the notion of personal data. In doing so, it shows that data protection law is grounded in the logic of knowledge communication, which stands in stark contrast with machine learning, which is predicated upon the logic of knowledge production, and hence, upon different definitions of data and information. This is what ultimately explains the failure of data protection to adequately regulate machine learning algorithms. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-07-23 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9292525/ /pubmed/35874796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12349 Text en © 2020 The Author. Regulation & Governance Published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Special Issue: Algorithmic Regulation Gellert, Raphaël Comparing definitions of data and information in data protection law and machine learning: A useful way forward to meaningfully regulate algorithms? |
title | Comparing definitions of data and information in data protection law and machine learning: A useful way forward to meaningfully regulate algorithms? |
title_full | Comparing definitions of data and information in data protection law and machine learning: A useful way forward to meaningfully regulate algorithms? |
title_fullStr | Comparing definitions of data and information in data protection law and machine learning: A useful way forward to meaningfully regulate algorithms? |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing definitions of data and information in data protection law and machine learning: A useful way forward to meaningfully regulate algorithms? |
title_short | Comparing definitions of data and information in data protection law and machine learning: A useful way forward to meaningfully regulate algorithms? |
title_sort | comparing definitions of data and information in data protection law and machine learning: a useful way forward to meaningfully regulate algorithms? |
topic | Special Issue: Algorithmic Regulation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rego.12349 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gellertraphael comparingdefinitionsofdataandinformationindataprotectionlawandmachinelearningausefulwayforwardtomeaningfullyregulatealgorithms |