Cargando…
Feasibility and safety of the successive use of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm
Distal transradial access (dTRA) is a novel alternative to conventional radial artery access for coronary catheterization. However, the feasibility and safety of repeated use of dTRA have not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the repeated use of dTRA f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29938 |
_version_ | 1784749393153359872 |
---|---|
author | Yamada, Takeshi Washimi, Soichiro Hashimoto, Sho Taniguchi, Norimasa Nakajima, Shunsuke Hata, Tetsuya Takahashi, Akihiko |
author_facet | Yamada, Takeshi Washimi, Soichiro Hashimoto, Sho Taniguchi, Norimasa Nakajima, Shunsuke Hata, Tetsuya Takahashi, Akihiko |
author_sort | Yamada, Takeshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Distal transradial access (dTRA) is a novel alternative to conventional radial artery access for coronary catheterization. However, the feasibility and safety of repeated use of dTRA have not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the repeated use of dTRA for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm. A total of 1717 patients underwent angiography or angioplasty via dTRA. We retrospectively analyzed the catheterization records of patients who underwent repeated puncture of the distal radial artery in the same arm. The incidence of successive applications of dTRA and the reasons for dropout were retrospectively investigated. A total of 416 patients, including three who underwent coronary catheterization with the bilateral dTRA in the initial attempt were analyzed. A 3‐, 4‐, 5‐, or 6‐French sheath or sheathless guide catheter was used in the initial procedure. A maximum of four successive coronary catheterization procedures were performed. The second procedure with dTRA on the same arm was successfully performed in 395 cases (94.3%), with a successive rate of 89.6% for both the third and fourth dTRA procedures. Conversion to another approach site (n = 30) was attributed to radial artery occlusion (n = 9), narrowing of the distal radial artery (n = 19), and puncture failure (n = 2). The current data indicate that the repeated use of dTRA is safe and feasible, and this approach may become a standard approach site in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9292528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92925282022-07-20 Feasibility and safety of the successive use of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm Yamada, Takeshi Washimi, Soichiro Hashimoto, Sho Taniguchi, Norimasa Nakajima, Shunsuke Hata, Tetsuya Takahashi, Akihiko Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Coronary Artery Disease Distal transradial access (dTRA) is a novel alternative to conventional radial artery access for coronary catheterization. However, the feasibility and safety of repeated use of dTRA have not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the repeated use of dTRA for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm. A total of 1717 patients underwent angiography or angioplasty via dTRA. We retrospectively analyzed the catheterization records of patients who underwent repeated puncture of the distal radial artery in the same arm. The incidence of successive applications of dTRA and the reasons for dropout were retrospectively investigated. A total of 416 patients, including three who underwent coronary catheterization with the bilateral dTRA in the initial attempt were analyzed. A 3‐, 4‐, 5‐, or 6‐French sheath or sheathless guide catheter was used in the initial procedure. A maximum of four successive coronary catheterization procedures were performed. The second procedure with dTRA on the same arm was successfully performed in 395 cases (94.3%), with a successive rate of 89.6% for both the third and fourth dTRA procedures. Conversion to another approach site (n = 30) was attributed to radial artery occlusion (n = 9), narrowing of the distal radial artery (n = 19), and puncture failure (n = 2). The current data indicate that the repeated use of dTRA is safe and feasible, and this approach may become a standard approach site in the future. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-08-28 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9292528/ /pubmed/34453475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29938 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Coronary Artery Disease Yamada, Takeshi Washimi, Soichiro Hashimoto, Sho Taniguchi, Norimasa Nakajima, Shunsuke Hata, Tetsuya Takahashi, Akihiko Feasibility and safety of the successive use of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm |
title | Feasibility and safety of the successive use of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm |
title_full | Feasibility and safety of the successive use of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and safety of the successive use of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and safety of the successive use of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm |
title_short | Feasibility and safety of the successive use of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm |
title_sort | feasibility and safety of the successive use of distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention in the same arm |
topic | Coronary Artery Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29938 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yamadatakeshi feasibilityandsafetyofthesuccessiveuseofdistaltransradialaccessforcoronaryangiographyandinterventioninthesamearm AT washimisoichiro feasibilityandsafetyofthesuccessiveuseofdistaltransradialaccessforcoronaryangiographyandinterventioninthesamearm AT hashimotosho feasibilityandsafetyofthesuccessiveuseofdistaltransradialaccessforcoronaryangiographyandinterventioninthesamearm AT taniguchinorimasa feasibilityandsafetyofthesuccessiveuseofdistaltransradialaccessforcoronaryangiographyandinterventioninthesamearm AT nakajimashunsuke feasibilityandsafetyofthesuccessiveuseofdistaltransradialaccessforcoronaryangiographyandinterventioninthesamearm AT hatatetsuya feasibilityandsafetyofthesuccessiveuseofdistaltransradialaccessforcoronaryangiographyandinterventioninthesamearm AT takahashiakihiko feasibilityandsafetyofthesuccessiveuseofdistaltransradialaccessforcoronaryangiographyandinterventioninthesamearm |