Cargando…

Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma

BACKGROUND: The TCGA molecular groups of endometrial carcinoma are “POLE‐mutated” (POLEmut), “microsatellite‐instable/mismatch repair‐deficient” (MSI/MMRd), “TP53‐mutated/p53‐abnormal” (TP53mut/p53abn), and “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP). OBJECTIVE: Prognostic assessment of the TCGA groups i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Travaglino, Antonio, Raffone, Antonio, Raimondo, Diego, Arciuolo, Damiano, Angelico, Giuseppe, Valente, Michele, Scaglione, Giulia, D’alessandris, Nicoletta, Casadio, Paolo, Inzani, Frediano, Mollo, Antonio, Santoro, Angela, Seracchioli, Renato, Franco Zannoni, Gian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34536971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13937
_version_ 1784749401487441920
author Travaglino, Antonio
Raffone, Antonio
Raimondo, Diego
Arciuolo, Damiano
Angelico, Giuseppe
Valente, Michele
Scaglione, Giulia
D’alessandris, Nicoletta
Casadio, Paolo
Inzani, Frediano
Mollo, Antonio
Santoro, Angela
Seracchioli, Renato
Franco Zannoni, Gian
author_facet Travaglino, Antonio
Raffone, Antonio
Raimondo, Diego
Arciuolo, Damiano
Angelico, Giuseppe
Valente, Michele
Scaglione, Giulia
D’alessandris, Nicoletta
Casadio, Paolo
Inzani, Frediano
Mollo, Antonio
Santoro, Angela
Seracchioli, Renato
Franco Zannoni, Gian
author_sort Travaglino, Antonio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The TCGA molecular groups of endometrial carcinoma are “POLE‐mutated” (POLEmut), “microsatellite‐instable/mismatch repair‐deficient” (MSI/MMRd), “TP53‐mutated/p53‐abnormal” (TP53mut/p53abn), and “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP). OBJECTIVE: Prognostic assessment of the TCGA groups in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic review from January 2000 to January 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies assessing the TCGA groups in UCS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox analyses (reference: TP53mut/p53abn group) and compared with endometrioid and serous carcinomas (original TCGA cohort), with a significant P < 0.050. MAIN RESULTS: Five studies with 263 UCS were included. Compared with TP53mut/p53abn UCS, MSI/MMRd UCS showed significantly better PFS (P < 0.001) but similar OS (P = 0.788), whereas NSMP UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.936) and OS (P = 0.240). Compared with their endometrioid/serous counterparts, NSMP and TP53mut/p53abn UCS showed significantly worse PFS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004) and OS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), while MSI/MMRd UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.595) but significantly worse OS (P < 0.001). The POLEmut group showed neither recurrences nor deaths in both the UCS and the endometrioid/serous carcinoma cohorts. CONCLUSION: POLEmut UCS show excellent prognosis, whereas TP53mut/p53abn and NSMP UCS show a prognosis even worse than that of TP53mut/p53abn endometrioid/serous carcinomas. The prognosis of MSI/MMRd UCS remains to be defined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92925612022-07-20 Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma Travaglino, Antonio Raffone, Antonio Raimondo, Diego Arciuolo, Damiano Angelico, Giuseppe Valente, Michele Scaglione, Giulia D’alessandris, Nicoletta Casadio, Paolo Inzani, Frediano Mollo, Antonio Santoro, Angela Seracchioli, Renato Franco Zannoni, Gian Int J Gynaecol Obstet Review Articles BACKGROUND: The TCGA molecular groups of endometrial carcinoma are “POLE‐mutated” (POLEmut), “microsatellite‐instable/mismatch repair‐deficient” (MSI/MMRd), “TP53‐mutated/p53‐abnormal” (TP53mut/p53abn), and “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP). OBJECTIVE: Prognostic assessment of the TCGA groups in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic review from January 2000 to January 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies assessing the TCGA groups in UCS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox analyses (reference: TP53mut/p53abn group) and compared with endometrioid and serous carcinomas (original TCGA cohort), with a significant P < 0.050. MAIN RESULTS: Five studies with 263 UCS were included. Compared with TP53mut/p53abn UCS, MSI/MMRd UCS showed significantly better PFS (P < 0.001) but similar OS (P = 0.788), whereas NSMP UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.936) and OS (P = 0.240). Compared with their endometrioid/serous counterparts, NSMP and TP53mut/p53abn UCS showed significantly worse PFS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004) and OS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), while MSI/MMRd UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.595) but significantly worse OS (P < 0.001). The POLEmut group showed neither recurrences nor deaths in both the UCS and the endometrioid/serous carcinoma cohorts. CONCLUSION: POLEmut UCS show excellent prognosis, whereas TP53mut/p53abn and NSMP UCS show a prognosis even worse than that of TP53mut/p53abn endometrioid/serous carcinomas. The prognosis of MSI/MMRd UCS remains to be defined. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-11 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9292561/ /pubmed/34536971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13937 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Travaglino, Antonio
Raffone, Antonio
Raimondo, Diego
Arciuolo, Damiano
Angelico, Giuseppe
Valente, Michele
Scaglione, Giulia
D’alessandris, Nicoletta
Casadio, Paolo
Inzani, Frediano
Mollo, Antonio
Santoro, Angela
Seracchioli, Renato
Franco Zannoni, Gian
Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma
title Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma
title_full Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma
title_fullStr Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma
title_short Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma
title_sort prognostic value of the tcga molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34536971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13937
work_keys_str_mv AT travaglinoantonio prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma
AT raffoneantonio prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma
AT raimondodiego prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma
AT arciuolodamiano prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma
AT angelicogiuseppe prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma
AT valentemichele prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma
AT scaglionegiulia prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma
AT dalessandrisnicoletta prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma
AT casadiopaolo prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma
AT inzanifrediano prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma
AT molloantonio prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma
AT santoroangela prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma
AT seracchiolirenato prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma
AT francozannonigian prognosticvalueofthetcgamolecularclassificationinuterinecarcinosarcoma