Cargando…

Does harvesting Urochloa and Megathyrsus forages at short intervals confer an advantage on cumulative dry matter yields and quality?

BACKGROUND: Due to increasing demand for livestock products in sub‐Saharan Africa, increasing livestock productivity is a priority. The core constraint is limited availability of feed of good quality. We assessed optimal harvesting time of three improved grasses, two Urochloa lines (Basilisk a selec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mwendia, Solomon W, Ohmstedt, Uwe, Nyakundi, Fridah, Notenbaert, An, Peters, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11407
_version_ 1784749405014851584
author Mwendia, Solomon W
Ohmstedt, Uwe
Nyakundi, Fridah
Notenbaert, An
Peters, Michael
author_facet Mwendia, Solomon W
Ohmstedt, Uwe
Nyakundi, Fridah
Notenbaert, An
Peters, Michael
author_sort Mwendia, Solomon W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to increasing demand for livestock products in sub‐Saharan Africa, increasing livestock productivity is a priority. The core constraint is limited availability of feed of good quality. We assessed optimal harvesting time of three improved grasses, two Urochloa lines (Basilisk a selection from wild population, Cayman – a hybrid, a product of breeding) plus Mombasa, a Megathyrsus selection. All are released in Latin America and Kenya or in the registration in other regional countries. We assessed dry matter (DM) yields and quality at 4, 6, 8 and 12 weeks of age in two sites. RESULTS: DM yields (in t ha(−1)) were of the order Cayman (9.6–14.3) > Mombasa (8.0–11.3) > Basilisk (5.5–10.2) in one site, and Cayman (6.4–9.7) > Basilisk (4.9–7.6) > Mombasa (3.3–5.9) at site two. The harvesting regimes produced DM largely similar for weeks 4 and 6, 6 and 8, 8 and 12. Across the sites quality was of the order Cayman > Mombasa > Basilisk for neutral detergent fiber (NDF), metabolizable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP). With increasing harvesting interval, MJ ME ha(−1) and kg CP ha(−1) were inconsistent across both sites, but significant differences returned for MJ ME ha(−1) unlike kg CP ha(−1). CONCLUSIONS: Harvesting at either 8 or 12 weeks is not recommendable as quality drops without an increase in DM yield that can compensate despite doubling and tripling time respectively, compared to 4 weeks. We recommend harvesting at 4 through 6 weeks for any of the three grasses based on yield against time, and demand at the intensified cut‐and‐carry smallholder systems. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92925742022-07-20 Does harvesting Urochloa and Megathyrsus forages at short intervals confer an advantage on cumulative dry matter yields and quality? Mwendia, Solomon W Ohmstedt, Uwe Nyakundi, Fridah Notenbaert, An Peters, Michael J Sci Food Agric Research Articles BACKGROUND: Due to increasing demand for livestock products in sub‐Saharan Africa, increasing livestock productivity is a priority. The core constraint is limited availability of feed of good quality. We assessed optimal harvesting time of three improved grasses, two Urochloa lines (Basilisk a selection from wild population, Cayman – a hybrid, a product of breeding) plus Mombasa, a Megathyrsus selection. All are released in Latin America and Kenya or in the registration in other regional countries. We assessed dry matter (DM) yields and quality at 4, 6, 8 and 12 weeks of age in two sites. RESULTS: DM yields (in t ha(−1)) were of the order Cayman (9.6–14.3) > Mombasa (8.0–11.3) > Basilisk (5.5–10.2) in one site, and Cayman (6.4–9.7) > Basilisk (4.9–7.6) > Mombasa (3.3–5.9) at site two. The harvesting regimes produced DM largely similar for weeks 4 and 6, 6 and 8, 8 and 12. Across the sites quality was of the order Cayman > Mombasa > Basilisk for neutral detergent fiber (NDF), metabolizable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP). With increasing harvesting interval, MJ ME ha(−1) and kg CP ha(−1) were inconsistent across both sites, but significant differences returned for MJ ME ha(−1) unlike kg CP ha(−1). CONCLUSIONS: Harvesting at either 8 or 12 weeks is not recommendable as quality drops without an increase in DM yield that can compensate despite doubling and tripling time respectively, compared to 4 weeks. We recommend harvesting at 4 through 6 weeks for any of the three grasses based on yield against time, and demand at the intensified cut‐and‐carry smallholder systems. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2021-07-13 2022-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9292574/ /pubmed/34192366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11407 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Mwendia, Solomon W
Ohmstedt, Uwe
Nyakundi, Fridah
Notenbaert, An
Peters, Michael
Does harvesting Urochloa and Megathyrsus forages at short intervals confer an advantage on cumulative dry matter yields and quality?
title Does harvesting Urochloa and Megathyrsus forages at short intervals confer an advantage on cumulative dry matter yields and quality?
title_full Does harvesting Urochloa and Megathyrsus forages at short intervals confer an advantage on cumulative dry matter yields and quality?
title_fullStr Does harvesting Urochloa and Megathyrsus forages at short intervals confer an advantage on cumulative dry matter yields and quality?
title_full_unstemmed Does harvesting Urochloa and Megathyrsus forages at short intervals confer an advantage on cumulative dry matter yields and quality?
title_short Does harvesting Urochloa and Megathyrsus forages at short intervals confer an advantage on cumulative dry matter yields and quality?
title_sort does harvesting urochloa and megathyrsus forages at short intervals confer an advantage on cumulative dry matter yields and quality?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34192366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11407
work_keys_str_mv AT mwendiasolomonw doesharvestingurochloaandmegathyrsusforagesatshortintervalsconferanadvantageoncumulativedrymatteryieldsandquality
AT ohmstedtuwe doesharvestingurochloaandmegathyrsusforagesatshortintervalsconferanadvantageoncumulativedrymatteryieldsandquality
AT nyakundifridah doesharvestingurochloaandmegathyrsusforagesatshortintervalsconferanadvantageoncumulativedrymatteryieldsandquality
AT notenbaertan doesharvestingurochloaandmegathyrsusforagesatshortintervalsconferanadvantageoncumulativedrymatteryieldsandquality
AT petersmichael doesharvestingurochloaandmegathyrsusforagesatshortintervalsconferanadvantageoncumulativedrymatteryieldsandquality