Cargando…
Comparison of left fourth and fifth intercostal space thoracotomy for open‐chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ease of access to thoracic structures for performing open‐chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OC‐CPR) differed between fourth and fifth intercostal space (ICS) left lateral thoracotomies in dogs, and to determine if “shingling” improved access for OC‐CPR manipulation...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33709525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vec.13059 |
_version_ | 1784749415556186112 |
---|---|
author | Warang, Anushri M. Mann, F. A. Middleton, John R. Wagner‐Mann, Colette Branson, Keith |
author_facet | Warang, Anushri M. Mann, F. A. Middleton, John R. Wagner‐Mann, Colette Branson, Keith |
author_sort | Warang, Anushri M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ease of access to thoracic structures for performing open‐chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OC‐CPR) differed between fourth and fifth intercostal space (ICS) left lateral thoracotomies in dogs, and to determine if “shingling” improved access for OC‐CPR manipulations. DESIGN: Prospective single‐blinded study. SETTING: Laboratory. ANIMALS: Twelve mixed breed canine cadavers weighing approximately 20 kg. INTERVENTIONS: Left lateral thoracotomies were performed at the 4th ICS (n = 6) or 5th ICS (n = 6). Shingling at the 4th or 5th ICS, as applicable, was performed after initial data collection and outcomes were reassessed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three evaluators blinded to the surgical approach scored the following parameters on a 0 to 10 scale (0 = easiest, 10 = most difficult): ease of access of the phrenicopericardial ligament, ease of pericardial incision, ease of appropriate hand position, ease of aortic access, ease of Rumel tourniquet application, and ease of proper placement of defibrillation paddles. Objective measurements (time to completion or number of attempts) were made for all but ease of pericardial incision and ease of appropriate hand position. Outcomes were reassessed after shingling. The 5th ICS was superior for ease of aortic access (P = 0.042), time to visualization of aorta (P = 0.009), and ease of application of a Rumel tourniquet (P = 0.019). When comparing scores pre‐ and post‐shingling, shingling improved time to visualization of the aorta (P < 0.001), time to placement of Rumel tourniquet (P < 0.001), ease of paddle placement (P = 0.017), and time to paddle placement (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Either 4th or 5th ICS thoracotomy may provide adequate access to intrathoracic structures pertinent to performing OC‐CPR in dogs weighing approximately 20 kg, but 5th ICS was preferred for most manipulations, and shingling improved access for most of the measured parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9292625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92926252022-07-20 Comparison of left fourth and fifth intercostal space thoracotomy for open‐chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs Warang, Anushri M. Mann, F. A. Middleton, John R. Wagner‐Mann, Colette Branson, Keith J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) Original Studies OBJECTIVE: To determine whether ease of access to thoracic structures for performing open‐chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OC‐CPR) differed between fourth and fifth intercostal space (ICS) left lateral thoracotomies in dogs, and to determine if “shingling” improved access for OC‐CPR manipulations. DESIGN: Prospective single‐blinded study. SETTING: Laboratory. ANIMALS: Twelve mixed breed canine cadavers weighing approximately 20 kg. INTERVENTIONS: Left lateral thoracotomies were performed at the 4th ICS (n = 6) or 5th ICS (n = 6). Shingling at the 4th or 5th ICS, as applicable, was performed after initial data collection and outcomes were reassessed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three evaluators blinded to the surgical approach scored the following parameters on a 0 to 10 scale (0 = easiest, 10 = most difficult): ease of access of the phrenicopericardial ligament, ease of pericardial incision, ease of appropriate hand position, ease of aortic access, ease of Rumel tourniquet application, and ease of proper placement of defibrillation paddles. Objective measurements (time to completion or number of attempts) were made for all but ease of pericardial incision and ease of appropriate hand position. Outcomes were reassessed after shingling. The 5th ICS was superior for ease of aortic access (P = 0.042), time to visualization of aorta (P = 0.009), and ease of application of a Rumel tourniquet (P = 0.019). When comparing scores pre‐ and post‐shingling, shingling improved time to visualization of the aorta (P < 0.001), time to placement of Rumel tourniquet (P < 0.001), ease of paddle placement (P = 0.017), and time to paddle placement (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Either 4th or 5th ICS thoracotomy may provide adequate access to intrathoracic structures pertinent to performing OC‐CPR in dogs weighing approximately 20 kg, but 5th ICS was preferred for most manipulations, and shingling improved access for most of the measured parameters. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC9292625/ /pubmed/33709525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vec.13059 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Studies Warang, Anushri M. Mann, F. A. Middleton, John R. Wagner‐Mann, Colette Branson, Keith Comparison of left fourth and fifth intercostal space thoracotomy for open‐chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs |
title | Comparison of left fourth and fifth intercostal space thoracotomy for open‐chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs |
title_full | Comparison of left fourth and fifth intercostal space thoracotomy for open‐chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs |
title_fullStr | Comparison of left fourth and fifth intercostal space thoracotomy for open‐chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of left fourth and fifth intercostal space thoracotomy for open‐chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs |
title_short | Comparison of left fourth and fifth intercostal space thoracotomy for open‐chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs |
title_sort | comparison of left fourth and fifth intercostal space thoracotomy for open‐chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs |
topic | Original Studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33709525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vec.13059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waranganushrim comparisonofleftfourthandfifthintercostalspacethoracotomyforopenchestcardiopulmonaryresuscitationindogs AT mannfa comparisonofleftfourthandfifthintercostalspacethoracotomyforopenchestcardiopulmonaryresuscitationindogs AT middletonjohnr comparisonofleftfourthandfifthintercostalspacethoracotomyforopenchestcardiopulmonaryresuscitationindogs AT wagnermanncolette comparisonofleftfourthandfifthintercostalspacethoracotomyforopenchestcardiopulmonaryresuscitationindogs AT bransonkeith comparisonofleftfourthandfifthintercostalspacethoracotomyforopenchestcardiopulmonaryresuscitationindogs |