Cargando…
Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate uterine tamponade devices’ effectiveness for atonic refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal birth and the effect of including them in institutional protocols. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, POPLINE, from inception to January 2021. STUDY SELECTI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34165867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16819 |
_version_ | 1784749425131782144 |
---|---|
author | Pingray, V Widmer, M Ciapponi, A Hofmeyr, GJ Deneux, C Gülmezoglu, M Bloemenkamp, K Oladapo, OT Comandé, D Bardach, A Vázquez, P Cormick, G Althabe, F |
author_facet | Pingray, V Widmer, M Ciapponi, A Hofmeyr, GJ Deneux, C Gülmezoglu, M Bloemenkamp, K Oladapo, OT Comandé, D Bardach, A Vázquez, P Cormick, G Althabe, F |
author_sort | Pingray, V |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate uterine tamponade devices’ effectiveness for atonic refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal birth and the effect of including them in institutional protocols. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, POPLINE, from inception to January 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised and non‐randomised comparative studies. OUTCOMES: Composite outcome including surgical interventions (artery ligations, compressive sutures or hysterectomy) or maternal death, and hysterectomy. RESULTS: All included studies were at high risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was rated as very low to low. One randomised study measured the effect of the condom‐catheter balloon compared with standard care and found unclear results for the composite outcome (relative risk [RR] 2.33, 95% CI 0.76–7.14) and hysterectomy (RR 4.14, 95% CI 0.48–35.93). Three comparative studies assessed the effect of including uterine balloon tamponade in institutional protocols. A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial suggested an increase in the composite outcome (RR 4.08, 95% CI 1.07–15.58) and unclear results for hysterectomy (RR 4.38, 95% CI 0.47–41.09) with the use of the condom‐catheter or surgical glove balloon. One non‐randomised study showed unclear effects on the composite outcome (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11–1.03) and hysterectomy (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.04–5.38) after the inclusion of the Bakri balloon. The second non‐randomised study found unclear effects on the composite outcome (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.32–2.81) and hysterectomy (RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.44–7.69) after the inclusion of Ebb or Bakri balloon. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of uterine tamponade devices for the management of atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery is unclear, as is the role of the type of device and the setting. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Unclear effects of uterine tamponade devices and their inclusion in institutional protocols for atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9292664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92926642022-07-20 Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review Pingray, V Widmer, M Ciapponi, A Hofmeyr, GJ Deneux, C Gülmezoglu, M Bloemenkamp, K Oladapo, OT Comandé, D Bardach, A Vázquez, P Cormick, G Althabe, F BJOG Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: To evaluate uterine tamponade devices’ effectiveness for atonic refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal birth and the effect of including them in institutional protocols. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, POPLINE, from inception to January 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised and non‐randomised comparative studies. OUTCOMES: Composite outcome including surgical interventions (artery ligations, compressive sutures or hysterectomy) or maternal death, and hysterectomy. RESULTS: All included studies were at high risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was rated as very low to low. One randomised study measured the effect of the condom‐catheter balloon compared with standard care and found unclear results for the composite outcome (relative risk [RR] 2.33, 95% CI 0.76–7.14) and hysterectomy (RR 4.14, 95% CI 0.48–35.93). Three comparative studies assessed the effect of including uterine balloon tamponade in institutional protocols. A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial suggested an increase in the composite outcome (RR 4.08, 95% CI 1.07–15.58) and unclear results for hysterectomy (RR 4.38, 95% CI 0.47–41.09) with the use of the condom‐catheter or surgical glove balloon. One non‐randomised study showed unclear effects on the composite outcome (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11–1.03) and hysterectomy (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.04–5.38) after the inclusion of the Bakri balloon. The second non‐randomised study found unclear effects on the composite outcome (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.32–2.81) and hysterectomy (RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.44–7.69) after the inclusion of Ebb or Bakri balloon. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of uterine tamponade devices for the management of atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery is unclear, as is the role of the type of device and the setting. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Unclear effects of uterine tamponade devices and their inclusion in institutional protocols for atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-19 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9292664/ /pubmed/34165867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16819 Text en © 2021 The World Health Organization. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Pingray, V Widmer, M Ciapponi, A Hofmeyr, GJ Deneux, C Gülmezoglu, M Bloemenkamp, K Oladapo, OT Comandé, D Bardach, A Vázquez, P Cormick, G Althabe, F Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review |
title | Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review |
title_full | Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review |
title_short | Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review |
title_sort | effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34165867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16819 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pingrayv effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview AT widmerm effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview AT ciapponia effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview AT hofmeyrgj effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview AT deneuxc effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview AT gulmezoglum effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview AT bloemenkampk effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview AT oladapoot effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview AT comanded effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview AT bardacha effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview AT vazquezp effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview AT cormickg effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview AT althabef effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview |