Cargando…

Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate uterine tamponade devices’ effectiveness for atonic refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal birth and the effect of including them in institutional protocols. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, POPLINE, from inception to January 2021. STUDY SELECTI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pingray, V, Widmer, M, Ciapponi, A, Hofmeyr, GJ, Deneux, C, Gülmezoglu, M, Bloemenkamp, K, Oladapo, OT, Comandé, D, Bardach, A, Vázquez, P, Cormick, G, Althabe, F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34165867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16819
_version_ 1784749425131782144
author Pingray, V
Widmer, M
Ciapponi, A
Hofmeyr, GJ
Deneux, C
Gülmezoglu, M
Bloemenkamp, K
Oladapo, OT
Comandé, D
Bardach, A
Vázquez, P
Cormick, G
Althabe, F
author_facet Pingray, V
Widmer, M
Ciapponi, A
Hofmeyr, GJ
Deneux, C
Gülmezoglu, M
Bloemenkamp, K
Oladapo, OT
Comandé, D
Bardach, A
Vázquez, P
Cormick, G
Althabe, F
author_sort Pingray, V
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate uterine tamponade devices’ effectiveness for atonic refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal birth and the effect of including them in institutional protocols. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, POPLINE, from inception to January 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised and non‐randomised comparative studies. OUTCOMES: Composite outcome including surgical interventions (artery ligations, compressive sutures or hysterectomy) or maternal death, and hysterectomy. RESULTS: All included studies were at high risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was rated as very low to low. One randomised study measured the effect of the condom‐catheter balloon compared with standard care and found unclear results for the composite outcome (relative risk [RR] 2.33, 95% CI 0.76–7.14) and hysterectomy (RR 4.14, 95% CI 0.48–35.93). Three comparative studies assessed the effect of including uterine balloon tamponade in institutional protocols. A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial suggested an increase in the composite outcome (RR 4.08, 95% CI 1.07–15.58) and unclear results for hysterectomy (RR 4.38, 95% CI 0.47–41.09) with the use of the condom‐catheter or surgical glove balloon. One non‐randomised study showed unclear effects on the composite outcome (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11–1.03) and hysterectomy (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.04–5.38) after the inclusion of the Bakri balloon. The second non‐randomised study found unclear effects on the composite outcome (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.32–2.81) and hysterectomy (RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.44–7.69) after the inclusion of Ebb or Bakri balloon. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of uterine tamponade devices for the management of atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery is unclear, as is the role of the type of device and the setting. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Unclear effects of uterine tamponade devices and their inclusion in institutional protocols for atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92926642022-07-20 Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review Pingray, V Widmer, M Ciapponi, A Hofmeyr, GJ Deneux, C Gülmezoglu, M Bloemenkamp, K Oladapo, OT Comandé, D Bardach, A Vázquez, P Cormick, G Althabe, F BJOG Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: To evaluate uterine tamponade devices’ effectiveness for atonic refractory postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) after vaginal birth and the effect of including them in institutional protocols. SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, POPLINE, from inception to January 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised and non‐randomised comparative studies. OUTCOMES: Composite outcome including surgical interventions (artery ligations, compressive sutures or hysterectomy) or maternal death, and hysterectomy. RESULTS: All included studies were at high risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was rated as very low to low. One randomised study measured the effect of the condom‐catheter balloon compared with standard care and found unclear results for the composite outcome (relative risk [RR] 2.33, 95% CI 0.76–7.14) and hysterectomy (RR 4.14, 95% CI 0.48–35.93). Three comparative studies assessed the effect of including uterine balloon tamponade in institutional protocols. A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial suggested an increase in the composite outcome (RR 4.08, 95% CI 1.07–15.58) and unclear results for hysterectomy (RR 4.38, 95% CI 0.47–41.09) with the use of the condom‐catheter or surgical glove balloon. One non‐randomised study showed unclear effects on the composite outcome (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11–1.03) and hysterectomy (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.04–5.38) after the inclusion of the Bakri balloon. The second non‐randomised study found unclear effects on the composite outcome (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.32–2.81) and hysterectomy (RR 1.84, 95% CI 0.44–7.69) after the inclusion of Ebb or Bakri balloon. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of uterine tamponade devices for the management of atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery is unclear, as is the role of the type of device and the setting. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Unclear effects of uterine tamponade devices and their inclusion in institutional protocols for atonic refractory PPH after vaginal delivery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-19 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9292664/ /pubmed/34165867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16819 Text en © 2021 The World Health Organization. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Pingray, V
Widmer, M
Ciapponi, A
Hofmeyr, GJ
Deneux, C
Gülmezoglu, M
Bloemenkamp, K
Oladapo, OT
Comandé, D
Bardach, A
Vázquez, P
Cormick, G
Althabe, F
Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review
title Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review
title_full Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review
title_fullStr Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review
title_short Effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review
title_sort effectiveness of uterine tamponade devices for refractory postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34165867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16819
work_keys_str_mv AT pingrayv effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview
AT widmerm effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview
AT ciapponia effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview
AT hofmeyrgj effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview
AT deneuxc effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview
AT gulmezoglum effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview
AT bloemenkampk effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview
AT oladapoot effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview
AT comanded effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview
AT bardacha effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview
AT vazquezp effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview
AT cormickg effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview
AT althabef effectivenessofuterinetamponadedevicesforrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageaftervaginalbirthasystematicreview