Cargando…
A review of the osteoderms of lizards (Reptilia: Squamata)
Osteoderms are mineralised structures consisting mainly of calcium phosphate and collagen. They form directly within the skin, with or without physical contact with the skeleton. Osteoderms, in some form, may be primitive for tetrapods as a whole, and are found in representatives of most major livin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34397141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12788 |
_version_ | 1784749435192868864 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Catherine Kirby, Alexander Marghoub, Arsalan Kéver, Loïc Ostashevskaya‐Gohstand, Sonya Bertazzo, Sergio Moazen, Mehran Abzhanov, Arkhat Herrel, Anthony Evans, Susan E. Vickaryous, Matt |
author_facet | Williams, Catherine Kirby, Alexander Marghoub, Arsalan Kéver, Loïc Ostashevskaya‐Gohstand, Sonya Bertazzo, Sergio Moazen, Mehran Abzhanov, Arkhat Herrel, Anthony Evans, Susan E. Vickaryous, Matt |
author_sort | Williams, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Osteoderms are mineralised structures consisting mainly of calcium phosphate and collagen. They form directly within the skin, with or without physical contact with the skeleton. Osteoderms, in some form, may be primitive for tetrapods as a whole, and are found in representatives of most major living lineages including turtles, crocodilians, lizards, armadillos, and some frogs, as well as extinct taxa ranging from early tetrapods to dinosaurs. However, their distribution in time and space raises questions about their evolution and homology in individual groups. Among lizards and their relatives, osteoderms may be completely absent; present only on the head or dorsum; or present all over the body in one of several arrangements, including non‐overlapping mineralised clusters, a continuous covering of overlapping plates, or as spicular mineralisations that thicken with age. This diversity makes lizards an excellent focal group in which to study osteoderm structure, function, development and evolution. In the past, the focus of researchers was primarily on the histological structure and/or the gross anatomy of individual osteoderms in a limited sample of taxa. Those studies demonstrated that lizard osteoderms are sometimes two‐layered structures, with a vitreous, avascular layer just below the epidermis and a deeper internal layer with abundant collagen within the deep dermis. However, there is considerable variation on this model, in terms of the arrangement of collagen fibres, presence of extra tissues, and/or a cancellous bone core bordered by cortices. Moreover, there is a lack of consensus on the contribution, if any, of osteoblasts in osteoderm development, despite research describing patterns of resorption and replacement that would suggest both osteoclast and osteoblast involvement. Key to this is information on development, but our understanding of the genetic and skeletogenic processes involved in osteoderm development and patterning remains minimal. The most common proposition for the presence of osteoderms is that they provide a protective armour. However, the large morphological and distributional diversity in lizard osteoderms raises the possibility that they may have other roles such as biomechanical reinforcement in response to ecological or functional constraints. If lizard osteoderms are primarily for defence, whether against predators or conspecifics, then this ‘bony armour’ might be predicted to have different structural and/or mechanical properties compared to other hard tissues (generally intended for support and locomotion). The cellular and biomineralisation mechanisms by which osteoderms are formed could also be different from those of other hard tissues, as reflected in their material composition and nanostructure. Material properties, especially the combination of malleability and resistance to impact, are of interest to the biomimetics and bioinspired material communities in the development of protective clothing and body armour. Currently, the literature on osteoderms is patchy and is distributed across a wide range of journals. Herein we present a synthesis of current knowledge on lizard osteoderm evolution and distribution, micro‐ and macrostructure, development, and function, with a view to stimulating further work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9292694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92926942022-07-20 A review of the osteoderms of lizards (Reptilia: Squamata) Williams, Catherine Kirby, Alexander Marghoub, Arsalan Kéver, Loïc Ostashevskaya‐Gohstand, Sonya Bertazzo, Sergio Moazen, Mehran Abzhanov, Arkhat Herrel, Anthony Evans, Susan E. Vickaryous, Matt Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc Original Articles Osteoderms are mineralised structures consisting mainly of calcium phosphate and collagen. They form directly within the skin, with or without physical contact with the skeleton. Osteoderms, in some form, may be primitive for tetrapods as a whole, and are found in representatives of most major living lineages including turtles, crocodilians, lizards, armadillos, and some frogs, as well as extinct taxa ranging from early tetrapods to dinosaurs. However, their distribution in time and space raises questions about their evolution and homology in individual groups. Among lizards and their relatives, osteoderms may be completely absent; present only on the head or dorsum; or present all over the body in one of several arrangements, including non‐overlapping mineralised clusters, a continuous covering of overlapping plates, or as spicular mineralisations that thicken with age. This diversity makes lizards an excellent focal group in which to study osteoderm structure, function, development and evolution. In the past, the focus of researchers was primarily on the histological structure and/or the gross anatomy of individual osteoderms in a limited sample of taxa. Those studies demonstrated that lizard osteoderms are sometimes two‐layered structures, with a vitreous, avascular layer just below the epidermis and a deeper internal layer with abundant collagen within the deep dermis. However, there is considerable variation on this model, in terms of the arrangement of collagen fibres, presence of extra tissues, and/or a cancellous bone core bordered by cortices. Moreover, there is a lack of consensus on the contribution, if any, of osteoblasts in osteoderm development, despite research describing patterns of resorption and replacement that would suggest both osteoclast and osteoblast involvement. Key to this is information on development, but our understanding of the genetic and skeletogenic processes involved in osteoderm development and patterning remains minimal. The most common proposition for the presence of osteoderms is that they provide a protective armour. However, the large morphological and distributional diversity in lizard osteoderms raises the possibility that they may have other roles such as biomechanical reinforcement in response to ecological or functional constraints. If lizard osteoderms are primarily for defence, whether against predators or conspecifics, then this ‘bony armour’ might be predicted to have different structural and/or mechanical properties compared to other hard tissues (generally intended for support and locomotion). The cellular and biomineralisation mechanisms by which osteoderms are formed could also be different from those of other hard tissues, as reflected in their material composition and nanostructure. Material properties, especially the combination of malleability and resistance to impact, are of interest to the biomimetics and bioinspired material communities in the development of protective clothing and body armour. Currently, the literature on osteoderms is patchy and is distributed across a wide range of journals. Herein we present a synthesis of current knowledge on lizard osteoderm evolution and distribution, micro‐ and macrostructure, development, and function, with a view to stimulating further work. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-08-16 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9292694/ /pubmed/34397141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12788 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Williams, Catherine Kirby, Alexander Marghoub, Arsalan Kéver, Loïc Ostashevskaya‐Gohstand, Sonya Bertazzo, Sergio Moazen, Mehran Abzhanov, Arkhat Herrel, Anthony Evans, Susan E. Vickaryous, Matt A review of the osteoderms of lizards (Reptilia: Squamata) |
title | A review of the osteoderms of lizards (Reptilia: Squamata) |
title_full | A review of the osteoderms of lizards (Reptilia: Squamata) |
title_fullStr | A review of the osteoderms of lizards (Reptilia: Squamata) |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of the osteoderms of lizards (Reptilia: Squamata) |
title_short | A review of the osteoderms of lizards (Reptilia: Squamata) |
title_sort | review of the osteoderms of lizards (reptilia: squamata) |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34397141 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12788 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamscatherine areviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT kirbyalexander areviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT marghoubarsalan areviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT keverloic areviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT ostashevskayagohstandsonya areviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT bertazzosergio areviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT moazenmehran areviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT abzhanovarkhat areviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT herrelanthony areviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT evanssusane areviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT vickaryousmatt areviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT williamscatherine reviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT kirbyalexander reviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT marghoubarsalan reviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT keverloic reviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT ostashevskayagohstandsonya reviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT bertazzosergio reviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT moazenmehran reviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT abzhanovarkhat reviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT herrelanthony reviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT evanssusane reviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata AT vickaryousmatt reviewoftheosteodermsoflizardsreptiliasquamata |