Cargando…
How to support equal standing in local health equity?
Attempts to decrease socioeconomic health disparities face various challenges, which include ethical questions about prioritization and value‐conflicts. To deal with these questions in a way that takes equal standing as a central value, this paper explores the potential of a relational egalitarian c...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12905 |
_version_ | 1784749436956573696 |
---|---|
author | Haverkamp, Beatrijs |
author_facet | Haverkamp, Beatrijs |
author_sort | Haverkamp, Beatrijs |
collection | PubMed |
description | Attempts to decrease socioeconomic health disparities face various challenges, which include ethical questions about prioritization and value‐conflicts. To deal with these questions in a way that takes equal standing as a central value, this paper explores the potential of a relational egalitarian capability approach to local health equity policies. Especially for local health equity policies, a relational egalitarian capability approach seems promising as it offers more perspectives for action and evaluation additional to considerations of distributive justice. To scrutinize if this approach can offer an adequate normative basis for health equity policies and be a helpful ethical guide in practice, five desiderata are identified that a relational egalitarian capability approach to local health equity should fulfil. These desiderata stem from a consideration of political‐ethical pluralism and scarcity of time and resources as non‐ideal conditions characterizing public policy practice, as well as of three questions that any capability approach should answer to be applicable in practice. For each of the five desiderata, a brief outline is given of what relational egalitarian theories and the capability approach offer in response to the questions implied by these desiderata. Ultimately, these questions need to be answered in relation to specific policies in particular contexts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9292702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92927022022-07-20 How to support equal standing in local health equity? Haverkamp, Beatrijs Bioethics Special Issue Articles Attempts to decrease socioeconomic health disparities face various challenges, which include ethical questions about prioritization and value‐conflicts. To deal with these questions in a way that takes equal standing as a central value, this paper explores the potential of a relational egalitarian capability approach to local health equity policies. Especially for local health equity policies, a relational egalitarian capability approach seems promising as it offers more perspectives for action and evaluation additional to considerations of distributive justice. To scrutinize if this approach can offer an adequate normative basis for health equity policies and be a helpful ethical guide in practice, five desiderata are identified that a relational egalitarian capability approach to local health equity should fulfil. These desiderata stem from a consideration of political‐ethical pluralism and scarcity of time and resources as non‐ideal conditions characterizing public policy practice, as well as of three questions that any capability approach should answer to be applicable in practice. For each of the five desiderata, a brief outline is given of what relational egalitarian theories and the capability approach offer in response to the questions implied by these desiderata. Ultimately, these questions need to be answered in relation to specific policies in particular contexts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-24 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9292702/ /pubmed/34169555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12905 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Bioethics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Special Issue Articles Haverkamp, Beatrijs How to support equal standing in local health equity? |
title | How to support equal standing in local health equity? |
title_full | How to support equal standing in local health equity? |
title_fullStr | How to support equal standing in local health equity? |
title_full_unstemmed | How to support equal standing in local health equity? |
title_short | How to support equal standing in local health equity? |
title_sort | how to support equal standing in local health equity? |
topic | Special Issue Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12905 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haverkampbeatrijs howtosupportequalstandinginlocalhealthequity |