Cargando…

How to support equal standing in local health equity?

Attempts to decrease socioeconomic health disparities face various challenges, which include ethical questions about prioritization and value‐conflicts. To deal with these questions in a way that takes equal standing as a central value, this paper explores the potential of a relational egalitarian c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Haverkamp, Beatrijs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12905
_version_ 1784749436956573696
author Haverkamp, Beatrijs
author_facet Haverkamp, Beatrijs
author_sort Haverkamp, Beatrijs
collection PubMed
description Attempts to decrease socioeconomic health disparities face various challenges, which include ethical questions about prioritization and value‐conflicts. To deal with these questions in a way that takes equal standing as a central value, this paper explores the potential of a relational egalitarian capability approach to local health equity policies. Especially for local health equity policies, a relational egalitarian capability approach seems promising as it offers more perspectives for action and evaluation additional to considerations of distributive justice. To scrutinize if this approach can offer an adequate normative basis for health equity policies and be a helpful ethical guide in practice, five desiderata are identified that a relational egalitarian capability approach to local health equity should fulfil. These desiderata stem from a consideration of political‐ethical pluralism and scarcity of time and resources as non‐ideal conditions characterizing public policy practice, as well as of three questions that any capability approach should answer to be applicable in practice. For each of the five desiderata, a brief outline is given of what relational egalitarian theories and the capability approach offer in response to the questions implied by these desiderata. Ultimately, these questions need to be answered in relation to specific policies in particular contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92927022022-07-20 How to support equal standing in local health equity? Haverkamp, Beatrijs Bioethics Special Issue Articles Attempts to decrease socioeconomic health disparities face various challenges, which include ethical questions about prioritization and value‐conflicts. To deal with these questions in a way that takes equal standing as a central value, this paper explores the potential of a relational egalitarian capability approach to local health equity policies. Especially for local health equity policies, a relational egalitarian capability approach seems promising as it offers more perspectives for action and evaluation additional to considerations of distributive justice. To scrutinize if this approach can offer an adequate normative basis for health equity policies and be a helpful ethical guide in practice, five desiderata are identified that a relational egalitarian capability approach to local health equity should fulfil. These desiderata stem from a consideration of political‐ethical pluralism and scarcity of time and resources as non‐ideal conditions characterizing public policy practice, as well as of three questions that any capability approach should answer to be applicable in practice. For each of the five desiderata, a brief outline is given of what relational egalitarian theories and the capability approach offer in response to the questions implied by these desiderata. Ultimately, these questions need to be answered in relation to specific policies in particular contexts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-06-24 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9292702/ /pubmed/34169555 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12905 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Bioethics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Special Issue Articles
Haverkamp, Beatrijs
How to support equal standing in local health equity?
title How to support equal standing in local health equity?
title_full How to support equal standing in local health equity?
title_fullStr How to support equal standing in local health equity?
title_full_unstemmed How to support equal standing in local health equity?
title_short How to support equal standing in local health equity?
title_sort how to support equal standing in local health equity?
topic Special Issue Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34169555
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12905
work_keys_str_mv AT haverkampbeatrijs howtosupportequalstandinginlocalhealthequity