Cargando…
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of biosimilar MYL‐1601D with US and European insulin aspart in healthy volunteers: A randomized, double‐blind, crossover, euglycaemic glucose clamp study
AIM: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) bioequivalence (BE) of MYL‐1601D biosimilar with originator, NovoLog (Ref‐InsAsp‐US), and NovoRapid (Ref‐InsAsp‐EU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a double‐blind, randomized, crossover study that enrolled 71 healthy subjects to rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34378861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14519 |
_version_ | 1784749441482227712 |
---|---|
author | Hövelmann, Ulrike Raiter, Yaron Chullikana, Anoop Liu, Mark Donnelly, Charles Lawrence, Tracey Sengupta, Nilanjan CL, Gopu Ranganna, Gopinath Barve, Abhijit |
author_facet | Hövelmann, Ulrike Raiter, Yaron Chullikana, Anoop Liu, Mark Donnelly, Charles Lawrence, Tracey Sengupta, Nilanjan CL, Gopu Ranganna, Gopinath Barve, Abhijit |
author_sort | Hövelmann, Ulrike |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) bioequivalence (BE) of MYL‐1601D biosimilar with originator, NovoLog (Ref‐InsAsp‐US), and NovoRapid (Ref‐InsAsp‐EU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a double‐blind, randomized, crossover study that enrolled 71 healthy subjects to receive a single subcutaneous dose (0.2 U/kg) of each formulation under automated euglycaemic clamp conditions (ClampArt, level 81 mg/dL, duration 12 hours postdose). Primary PK endpoints were area under the plasma insulin aspart concentration‐time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC(0‐12h)) and maximum plasma insulin aspart concentration (C(max)). Primary PD endpoints were area under the glucose infusion rate (GIR) time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC(GIR0‐12h)) and maximum GIR (GIR(max)). Insulin aspart in plasma was quantified using immunoaffinity purification followed by ultraperformance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometric detection. The pairwise comparisons of geometric least square mean (LS‐mean) ratio for a 90% confidence interval (CI) of primary PK, and 90% CIs (MYL‐1601D vs. Ref‐InsAsp‐US) and 95% CIs (MYL‐1601D vs. Ref‐InsAsp‐EU) of primary PD variables, were to be within 80% to 125% to show BE. RESULTS: MYL‐1601D showed PK BE to both Ref‐InsAsp‐US (AUC(0‐12h) geometric LS‐mean ratio 102.17, 90% CI [100.26; 104.11]; C(max) 106.13 [100.71; 111.85]) and Ref‐InsAsp‐EU (AUC(0‐12h) 101.84 [100.04; 103.67]; C(max) 105.74 [101.09; 110.60]). Likewise, MYL‐1601D showed PD BE to Ref‐InsAsp‐US (AUC(GIR_0‐last) 99.93; 90% CI [95.74; 104.30]; GIR(_max) 100.12 [94.46; 106.12]) and Ref‐InsAsp‐EU (AUC(GIR_0‐last) 96.42; 95% CI [91.17; 101.98]; GIR(_max) 95.10 [89.37; 101.19]). All three insulin aspart products were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: MYL‐1601D showed BE to Ref‐InsAsp‐US and Ref‐InsAsp‐EU with a comparable safety profile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9292719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92927192022-07-20 Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of biosimilar MYL‐1601D with US and European insulin aspart in healthy volunteers: A randomized, double‐blind, crossover, euglycaemic glucose clamp study Hövelmann, Ulrike Raiter, Yaron Chullikana, Anoop Liu, Mark Donnelly, Charles Lawrence, Tracey Sengupta, Nilanjan CL, Gopu Ranganna, Gopinath Barve, Abhijit Diabetes Obes Metab Original Articles AIM: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) bioequivalence (BE) of MYL‐1601D biosimilar with originator, NovoLog (Ref‐InsAsp‐US), and NovoRapid (Ref‐InsAsp‐EU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a double‐blind, randomized, crossover study that enrolled 71 healthy subjects to receive a single subcutaneous dose (0.2 U/kg) of each formulation under automated euglycaemic clamp conditions (ClampArt, level 81 mg/dL, duration 12 hours postdose). Primary PK endpoints were area under the plasma insulin aspart concentration‐time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC(0‐12h)) and maximum plasma insulin aspart concentration (C(max)). Primary PD endpoints were area under the glucose infusion rate (GIR) time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC(GIR0‐12h)) and maximum GIR (GIR(max)). Insulin aspart in plasma was quantified using immunoaffinity purification followed by ultraperformance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometric detection. The pairwise comparisons of geometric least square mean (LS‐mean) ratio for a 90% confidence interval (CI) of primary PK, and 90% CIs (MYL‐1601D vs. Ref‐InsAsp‐US) and 95% CIs (MYL‐1601D vs. Ref‐InsAsp‐EU) of primary PD variables, were to be within 80% to 125% to show BE. RESULTS: MYL‐1601D showed PK BE to both Ref‐InsAsp‐US (AUC(0‐12h) geometric LS‐mean ratio 102.17, 90% CI [100.26; 104.11]; C(max) 106.13 [100.71; 111.85]) and Ref‐InsAsp‐EU (AUC(0‐12h) 101.84 [100.04; 103.67]; C(max) 105.74 [101.09; 110.60]). Likewise, MYL‐1601D showed PD BE to Ref‐InsAsp‐US (AUC(GIR_0‐last) 99.93; 90% CI [95.74; 104.30]; GIR(_max) 100.12 [94.46; 106.12]) and Ref‐InsAsp‐EU (AUC(GIR_0‐last) 96.42; 95% CI [91.17; 101.98]; GIR(_max) 95.10 [89.37; 101.19]). All three insulin aspart products were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: MYL‐1601D showed BE to Ref‐InsAsp‐US and Ref‐InsAsp‐EU with a comparable safety profile. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-08-25 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9292719/ /pubmed/34378861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14519 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hövelmann, Ulrike Raiter, Yaron Chullikana, Anoop Liu, Mark Donnelly, Charles Lawrence, Tracey Sengupta, Nilanjan CL, Gopu Ranganna, Gopinath Barve, Abhijit Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of biosimilar MYL‐1601D with US and European insulin aspart in healthy volunteers: A randomized, double‐blind, crossover, euglycaemic glucose clamp study |
title | Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of biosimilar MYL‐1601D with US and European insulin aspart in healthy volunteers: A randomized, double‐blind, crossover, euglycaemic glucose clamp study |
title_full | Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of biosimilar MYL‐1601D with US and European insulin aspart in healthy volunteers: A randomized, double‐blind, crossover, euglycaemic glucose clamp study |
title_fullStr | Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of biosimilar MYL‐1601D with US and European insulin aspart in healthy volunteers: A randomized, double‐blind, crossover, euglycaemic glucose clamp study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of biosimilar MYL‐1601D with US and European insulin aspart in healthy volunteers: A randomized, double‐blind, crossover, euglycaemic glucose clamp study |
title_short | Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of biosimilar MYL‐1601D with US and European insulin aspart in healthy volunteers: A randomized, double‐blind, crossover, euglycaemic glucose clamp study |
title_sort | pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bioequivalence of biosimilar myl‐1601d with us and european insulin aspart in healthy volunteers: a randomized, double‐blind, crossover, euglycaemic glucose clamp study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34378861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14519 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hovelmannulrike pharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicbioequivalenceofbiosimilarmyl1601dwithusandeuropeaninsulinaspartinhealthyvolunteersarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovereuglycaemicglucoseclampstudy AT raiteryaron pharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicbioequivalenceofbiosimilarmyl1601dwithusandeuropeaninsulinaspartinhealthyvolunteersarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovereuglycaemicglucoseclampstudy AT chullikanaanoop pharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicbioequivalenceofbiosimilarmyl1601dwithusandeuropeaninsulinaspartinhealthyvolunteersarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovereuglycaemicglucoseclampstudy AT liumark pharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicbioequivalenceofbiosimilarmyl1601dwithusandeuropeaninsulinaspartinhealthyvolunteersarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovereuglycaemicglucoseclampstudy AT donnellycharles pharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicbioequivalenceofbiosimilarmyl1601dwithusandeuropeaninsulinaspartinhealthyvolunteersarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovereuglycaemicglucoseclampstudy AT lawrencetracey pharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicbioequivalenceofbiosimilarmyl1601dwithusandeuropeaninsulinaspartinhealthyvolunteersarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovereuglycaemicglucoseclampstudy AT senguptanilanjan pharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicbioequivalenceofbiosimilarmyl1601dwithusandeuropeaninsulinaspartinhealthyvolunteersarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovereuglycaemicglucoseclampstudy AT clgopu pharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicbioequivalenceofbiosimilarmyl1601dwithusandeuropeaninsulinaspartinhealthyvolunteersarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovereuglycaemicglucoseclampstudy AT rangannagopinath pharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicbioequivalenceofbiosimilarmyl1601dwithusandeuropeaninsulinaspartinhealthyvolunteersarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovereuglycaemicglucoseclampstudy AT barveabhijit pharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicbioequivalenceofbiosimilarmyl1601dwithusandeuropeaninsulinaspartinhealthyvolunteersarandomizeddoubleblindcrossovereuglycaemicglucoseclampstudy |