Cargando…

Profiling myelodysplastic syndromes by mass cytometry demonstrates abnormal progenitor cell phenotype and differentiation

BACKGROUND: We sought to enhance the cytometric analysis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) by performing a pilot study of a single cell mass cytometry (MCM) assay to more comprehensively analyze patterns of surface marker expression in patients with MDS. METHODS: Twenty‐three MDS and five healthy d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Behbehani, Gregory K., Finck, Rachel, Samusik, Nikolay, Sridhar, Kunju, Fantl, Wendy J., Greenberg, Peter L., Nolan, Garry P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31917512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21860
_version_ 1784749470023417856
author Behbehani, Gregory K.
Finck, Rachel
Samusik, Nikolay
Sridhar, Kunju
Fantl, Wendy J.
Greenberg, Peter L.
Nolan, Garry P.
author_facet Behbehani, Gregory K.
Finck, Rachel
Samusik, Nikolay
Sridhar, Kunju
Fantl, Wendy J.
Greenberg, Peter L.
Nolan, Garry P.
author_sort Behbehani, Gregory K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We sought to enhance the cytometric analysis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) by performing a pilot study of a single cell mass cytometry (MCM) assay to more comprehensively analyze patterns of surface marker expression in patients with MDS. METHODS: Twenty‐three MDS and five healthy donor bone marrow samples were studied using a 34‐parameter mass cytometry panel utilizing barcoding and internal reference standards. The resulting data were analyzed by both traditional gating and high‐dimensional clustering. RESULTS: This high‐dimensional assay provided three major benefits relative to traditional cytometry approaches: First, MCM enabled detection of aberrant surface maker at high resolution, detecting aberrancies in 27/31 surface markers, encompassing almost every previously reported MDS surface marker aberrancy. Additionally, three previously unrecognized aberrancies in MDS were detected in multiple samples at least one developmental stage: increased CD321 and CD99; and decreased CD47. Second, analysis of the stem and progenitor cell compartment (HSPCs), demonstrated aberrant expression in 21 of the 23 MDS samples, which were not detected in three samples from patients with idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance. These immunophenotypically abnormal HSPCs were also the single most significant distinguishing feature between clinical risk groups. Third, unsupervised clustering of high‐parameter MCM data allowed identification of abnormal differentiation patterns associated with immunophenotypically aberrant myeloid cells similar to myeloid derived suppressor cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that high‐parameter cytometry methods that enable simultaneous analysis of all bone marrow cell types could enhance the diagnostic utility of immunophenotypic analysis in MDS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92928282022-07-20 Profiling myelodysplastic syndromes by mass cytometry demonstrates abnormal progenitor cell phenotype and differentiation Behbehani, Gregory K. Finck, Rachel Samusik, Nikolay Sridhar, Kunju Fantl, Wendy J. Greenberg, Peter L. Nolan, Garry P. Cytometry B Clin Cytom Original Articles BACKGROUND: We sought to enhance the cytometric analysis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) by performing a pilot study of a single cell mass cytometry (MCM) assay to more comprehensively analyze patterns of surface marker expression in patients with MDS. METHODS: Twenty‐three MDS and five healthy donor bone marrow samples were studied using a 34‐parameter mass cytometry panel utilizing barcoding and internal reference standards. The resulting data were analyzed by both traditional gating and high‐dimensional clustering. RESULTS: This high‐dimensional assay provided three major benefits relative to traditional cytometry approaches: First, MCM enabled detection of aberrant surface maker at high resolution, detecting aberrancies in 27/31 surface markers, encompassing almost every previously reported MDS surface marker aberrancy. Additionally, three previously unrecognized aberrancies in MDS were detected in multiple samples at least one developmental stage: increased CD321 and CD99; and decreased CD47. Second, analysis of the stem and progenitor cell compartment (HSPCs), demonstrated aberrant expression in 21 of the 23 MDS samples, which were not detected in three samples from patients with idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance. These immunophenotypically abnormal HSPCs were also the single most significant distinguishing feature between clinical risk groups. Third, unsupervised clustering of high‐parameter MCM data allowed identification of abnormal differentiation patterns associated with immunophenotypically aberrant myeloid cells similar to myeloid derived suppressor cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that high‐parameter cytometry methods that enable simultaneous analysis of all bone marrow cell types could enhance the diagnostic utility of immunophenotypic analysis in MDS. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-01-09 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9292828/ /pubmed/31917512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21860 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Clinical Cytometry Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Behbehani, Gregory K.
Finck, Rachel
Samusik, Nikolay
Sridhar, Kunju
Fantl, Wendy J.
Greenberg, Peter L.
Nolan, Garry P.
Profiling myelodysplastic syndromes by mass cytometry demonstrates abnormal progenitor cell phenotype and differentiation
title Profiling myelodysplastic syndromes by mass cytometry demonstrates abnormal progenitor cell phenotype and differentiation
title_full Profiling myelodysplastic syndromes by mass cytometry demonstrates abnormal progenitor cell phenotype and differentiation
title_fullStr Profiling myelodysplastic syndromes by mass cytometry demonstrates abnormal progenitor cell phenotype and differentiation
title_full_unstemmed Profiling myelodysplastic syndromes by mass cytometry demonstrates abnormal progenitor cell phenotype and differentiation
title_short Profiling myelodysplastic syndromes by mass cytometry demonstrates abnormal progenitor cell phenotype and differentiation
title_sort profiling myelodysplastic syndromes by mass cytometry demonstrates abnormal progenitor cell phenotype and differentiation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31917512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.21860
work_keys_str_mv AT behbehanigregoryk profilingmyelodysplasticsyndromesbymasscytometrydemonstratesabnormalprogenitorcellphenotypeanddifferentiation
AT finckrachel profilingmyelodysplasticsyndromesbymasscytometrydemonstratesabnormalprogenitorcellphenotypeanddifferentiation
AT samusiknikolay profilingmyelodysplasticsyndromesbymasscytometrydemonstratesabnormalprogenitorcellphenotypeanddifferentiation
AT sridharkunju profilingmyelodysplasticsyndromesbymasscytometrydemonstratesabnormalprogenitorcellphenotypeanddifferentiation
AT fantlwendyj profilingmyelodysplasticsyndromesbymasscytometrydemonstratesabnormalprogenitorcellphenotypeanddifferentiation
AT greenbergpeterl profilingmyelodysplasticsyndromesbymasscytometrydemonstratesabnormalprogenitorcellphenotypeanddifferentiation
AT nolangarryp profilingmyelodysplasticsyndromesbymasscytometrydemonstratesabnormalprogenitorcellphenotypeanddifferentiation