Cargando…
Training sample selection: Impact on screening automation in diagnostic test accuracy reviews
When performing a systematic review, researchers screen the articles retrieved after a broad search strategy one by one, which is time‐consuming. Computerised support of this screening process has been applied with varying success. This is partly due to the dependency on large amounts of data to dev...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1518 |
_version_ | 1784749485866352640 |
---|---|
author | van Altena, Allard J. Spijker, René Leeflang, Mariska M. G. Olabarriaga, Sílvia Delgado |
author_facet | van Altena, Allard J. Spijker, René Leeflang, Mariska M. G. Olabarriaga, Sílvia Delgado |
author_sort | van Altena, Allard J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | When performing a systematic review, researchers screen the articles retrieved after a broad search strategy one by one, which is time‐consuming. Computerised support of this screening process has been applied with varying success. This is partly due to the dependency on large amounts of data to develop models that predict inclusion. In this paper, we present an approach to choose which data to use in model training and compare it with established approaches. We used a dataset of 50 Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews, and each was used as a target review. From the remaining 49 reviews, we selected those that most closely resembled the target review's clinical topic using the cosine similarity metric. Included and excluded studies from these selected reviews were then used to develop our prediction models. The performance of models trained on the selected reviews was compared against models trained on studies from all available reviews. The prediction models performed best with a larger number of reviews in the training set and on target reviews that had a research subject similar to other reviews in the dataset. Our approach using cosine similarity may reduce computational costs for model training and the duration of the screening process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9292892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92928922022-07-20 Training sample selection: Impact on screening automation in diagnostic test accuracy reviews van Altena, Allard J. Spijker, René Leeflang, Mariska M. G. Olabarriaga, Sílvia Delgado Res Synth Methods Research Articles When performing a systematic review, researchers screen the articles retrieved after a broad search strategy one by one, which is time‐consuming. Computerised support of this screening process has been applied with varying success. This is partly due to the dependency on large amounts of data to develop models that predict inclusion. In this paper, we present an approach to choose which data to use in model training and compare it with established approaches. We used a dataset of 50 Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews, and each was used as a target review. From the remaining 49 reviews, we selected those that most closely resembled the target review's clinical topic using the cosine similarity metric. Included and excluded studies from these selected reviews were then used to develop our prediction models. The performance of models trained on the selected reviews was compared against models trained on studies from all available reviews. The prediction models performed best with a larger number of reviews in the training set and on target reviews that had a research subject similar to other reviews in the dataset. Our approach using cosine similarity may reduce computational costs for model training and the duration of the screening process. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-25 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9292892/ /pubmed/34390193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1518 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Research Synthesis Methods published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles van Altena, Allard J. Spijker, René Leeflang, Mariska M. G. Olabarriaga, Sílvia Delgado Training sample selection: Impact on screening automation in diagnostic test accuracy reviews |
title | Training sample selection: Impact on screening automation in diagnostic test accuracy reviews |
title_full | Training sample selection: Impact on screening automation in diagnostic test accuracy reviews |
title_fullStr | Training sample selection: Impact on screening automation in diagnostic test accuracy reviews |
title_full_unstemmed | Training sample selection: Impact on screening automation in diagnostic test accuracy reviews |
title_short | Training sample selection: Impact on screening automation in diagnostic test accuracy reviews |
title_sort | training sample selection: impact on screening automation in diagnostic test accuracy reviews |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34390193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanaltenaallardj trainingsampleselectionimpactonscreeningautomationindiagnostictestaccuracyreviews AT spijkerrene trainingsampleselectionimpactonscreeningautomationindiagnostictestaccuracyreviews AT leeflangmariskamg trainingsampleselectionimpactonscreeningautomationindiagnostictestaccuracyreviews AT olabarriagasilviadelgado trainingsampleselectionimpactonscreeningautomationindiagnostictestaccuracyreviews |