Cargando…

Reconciling carbon‐cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales

Understanding carbon (C) dynamics from ecosystem to global scales remains a challenge. Although expansion of global carbon dioxide (CO(2)) observatories makes it possible to estimate C‐cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales, these estimates do not necessarily agree. At the continental US sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ballantyne, Ashley P, Liu, Zhihua, Anderegg, William RL, Yu, Zicheng, Stoy, Paul, Poulter, Ben, Vanderwall, Joseph, Watts, Jennifer, Kelsey, Kathy, Neff, Jason
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fee.2296
_version_ 1784749487330164736
author Ballantyne, Ashley P
Liu, Zhihua
Anderegg, William RL
Yu, Zicheng
Stoy, Paul
Poulter, Ben
Vanderwall, Joseph
Watts, Jennifer
Kelsey, Kathy
Neff, Jason
author_facet Ballantyne, Ashley P
Liu, Zhihua
Anderegg, William RL
Yu, Zicheng
Stoy, Paul
Poulter, Ben
Vanderwall, Joseph
Watts, Jennifer
Kelsey, Kathy
Neff, Jason
author_sort Ballantyne, Ashley P
collection PubMed
description Understanding carbon (C) dynamics from ecosystem to global scales remains a challenge. Although expansion of global carbon dioxide (CO(2)) observatories makes it possible to estimate C‐cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales, these estimates do not necessarily agree. At the continental US scale, only 5% of C fixed through photosynthesis remains as net ecosystem exchange (NEE), but ecosystem measurements indicate that only 2% of fixed C remains in grasslands, whereas as much as 30% remains in needleleaf forests. The wet and warm Southeast has the highest gross primary productivity and the relatively wet and cool Midwest has the highest NEE, indicating important spatial mismatches. Newly available satellite and atmospheric data can be combined in innovative ways to identify potential C loss pathways to reconcile these spatial mismatches. Independent datasets compiled from terrestrial and aquatic environments can now be combined to advance C‐cycle science across the land–water interface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92928982022-07-20 Reconciling carbon‐cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales Ballantyne, Ashley P Liu, Zhihua Anderegg, William RL Yu, Zicheng Stoy, Paul Poulter, Ben Vanderwall, Joseph Watts, Jennifer Kelsey, Kathy Neff, Jason Front Ecol Environ Macrosystems Biology Papers Understanding carbon (C) dynamics from ecosystem to global scales remains a challenge. Although expansion of global carbon dioxide (CO(2)) observatories makes it possible to estimate C‐cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales, these estimates do not necessarily agree. At the continental US scale, only 5% of C fixed through photosynthesis remains as net ecosystem exchange (NEE), but ecosystem measurements indicate that only 2% of fixed C remains in grasslands, whereas as much as 30% remains in needleleaf forests. The wet and warm Southeast has the highest gross primary productivity and the relatively wet and cool Midwest has the highest NEE, indicating important spatial mismatches. Newly available satellite and atmospheric data can be combined in innovative ways to identify potential C loss pathways to reconcile these spatial mismatches. Independent datasets compiled from terrestrial and aquatic environments can now be combined to advance C‐cycle science across the land–water interface. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-02-01 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9292898/ /pubmed/35874182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fee.2296 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the Ecological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Macrosystems Biology Papers
Ballantyne, Ashley P
Liu, Zhihua
Anderegg, William RL
Yu, Zicheng
Stoy, Paul
Poulter, Ben
Vanderwall, Joseph
Watts, Jennifer
Kelsey, Kathy
Neff, Jason
Reconciling carbon‐cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales
title Reconciling carbon‐cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales
title_full Reconciling carbon‐cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales
title_fullStr Reconciling carbon‐cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales
title_full_unstemmed Reconciling carbon‐cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales
title_short Reconciling carbon‐cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales
title_sort reconciling carbon‐cycle processes from ecosystem to global scales
topic Macrosystems Biology Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35874182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fee.2296
work_keys_str_mv AT ballantyneashleyp reconcilingcarboncycleprocessesfromecosystemtoglobalscales
AT liuzhihua reconcilingcarboncycleprocessesfromecosystemtoglobalscales
AT andereggwilliamrl reconcilingcarboncycleprocessesfromecosystemtoglobalscales
AT yuzicheng reconcilingcarboncycleprocessesfromecosystemtoglobalscales
AT stoypaul reconcilingcarboncycleprocessesfromecosystemtoglobalscales
AT poulterben reconcilingcarboncycleprocessesfromecosystemtoglobalscales
AT vanderwalljoseph reconcilingcarboncycleprocessesfromecosystemtoglobalscales
AT wattsjennifer reconcilingcarboncycleprocessesfromecosystemtoglobalscales
AT kelseykathy reconcilingcarboncycleprocessesfromecosystemtoglobalscales
AT neffjason reconcilingcarboncycleprocessesfromecosystemtoglobalscales