Cargando…
Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function
OBJECTIVES: To report the long‐term follow‐up outcomes of masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development (DSD), including both physicians' and patients’ perspectives on appearance and functional outcome, including sexuality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 1040 adolescents (a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33587786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15369 |
_version_ | 1784749490926780416 |
---|---|
author | van de Grift, Tim C. Rapp, Marion Holmdahl, Gundela Duranteau, Lise Nordenskjold, Agneta |
author_facet | van de Grift, Tim C. Rapp, Marion Holmdahl, Gundela Duranteau, Lise Nordenskjold, Agneta |
author_sort | van de Grift, Tim C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To report the long‐term follow‐up outcomes of masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development (DSD), including both physicians' and patients’ perspectives on appearance and functional outcome, including sexuality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 1040 adolescents (age ≥16 years) and adults with a DSD took part in this multicentre cross‐sectional clinical study in six European countries in 2014/2015. Of those, 150 living in other than the female gender had some kind of masculinizing surgery: hypospadias repair, orchidopexy, breast reduction and/or gonadectomy. The study protocol included medical data collection, an optional genital examination, and patient‐reported outcomes including satisfaction with appearance and current sexual functioning. RESULTS: Diagnoses included partial and mixed gonadal dysgenesis (45,XO/46,XY; n = 38), Klinefelter syndrome/46,XX males (n = 57), and various 46,XY DSDs (n = 42; e.g. partial androgen insensitivity syndrome, severe hypospadias) and 13 with other diagnoses. Of the participants, 84 underwent hypospadias surgery, 86 orchidopexy, 52 gonadectomy and 32 breast reduction (combinations possible). Physicians evaluated anatomical appearance at genital examination as poor in approximately 11% of patients. After hypospadias surgery, 38% of participants reported that they were (very) dissatisfied with anatomical appearance and 20% with function. The physician and patient evaluations were moderately correlated (r = 0.43). CONCLUSION: The majority of participants were neutral to satisfied with the appearance and function in the long‐term after masculinizing surgery. Given the initial severe phenotype and a risk of unsatisfactory results after masculinizing surgery in DSD, treatment should be handled by experienced multidisciplinary teams in order to optimize the postoperative results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9292912 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92929122022-07-20 Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function van de Grift, Tim C. Rapp, Marion Holmdahl, Gundela Duranteau, Lise Nordenskjold, Agneta BJU Int Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To report the long‐term follow‐up outcomes of masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development (DSD), including both physicians' and patients’ perspectives on appearance and functional outcome, including sexuality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 1040 adolescents (age ≥16 years) and adults with a DSD took part in this multicentre cross‐sectional clinical study in six European countries in 2014/2015. Of those, 150 living in other than the female gender had some kind of masculinizing surgery: hypospadias repair, orchidopexy, breast reduction and/or gonadectomy. The study protocol included medical data collection, an optional genital examination, and patient‐reported outcomes including satisfaction with appearance and current sexual functioning. RESULTS: Diagnoses included partial and mixed gonadal dysgenesis (45,XO/46,XY; n = 38), Klinefelter syndrome/46,XX males (n = 57), and various 46,XY DSDs (n = 42; e.g. partial androgen insensitivity syndrome, severe hypospadias) and 13 with other diagnoses. Of the participants, 84 underwent hypospadias surgery, 86 orchidopexy, 52 gonadectomy and 32 breast reduction (combinations possible). Physicians evaluated anatomical appearance at genital examination as poor in approximately 11% of patients. After hypospadias surgery, 38% of participants reported that they were (very) dissatisfied with anatomical appearance and 20% with function. The physician and patient evaluations were moderately correlated (r = 0.43). CONCLUSION: The majority of participants were neutral to satisfied with the appearance and function in the long‐term after masculinizing surgery. Given the initial severe phenotype and a risk of unsatisfactory results after masculinizing surgery in DSD, treatment should be handled by experienced multidisciplinary teams in order to optimize the postoperative results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-31 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9292912/ /pubmed/33587786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15369 Text en © 2021 The Authors BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles van de Grift, Tim C. Rapp, Marion Holmdahl, Gundela Duranteau, Lise Nordenskjold, Agneta Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function |
title | Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function |
title_full | Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function |
title_fullStr | Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function |
title_full_unstemmed | Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function |
title_short | Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function |
title_sort | masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292912/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33587786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15369 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandegrifttimc masculinizingsurgeryindisordersdifferencesofsexdevelopmentclinicianandparticipantevaluatedappearanceandfunction AT rappmarion masculinizingsurgeryindisordersdifferencesofsexdevelopmentclinicianandparticipantevaluatedappearanceandfunction AT holmdahlgundela masculinizingsurgeryindisordersdifferencesofsexdevelopmentclinicianandparticipantevaluatedappearanceandfunction AT duranteaulise masculinizingsurgeryindisordersdifferencesofsexdevelopmentclinicianandparticipantevaluatedappearanceandfunction AT nordenskjoldagneta masculinizingsurgeryindisordersdifferencesofsexdevelopmentclinicianandparticipantevaluatedappearanceandfunction AT masculinizingsurgeryindisordersdifferencesofsexdevelopmentclinicianandparticipantevaluatedappearanceandfunction |