Cargando…

Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function

OBJECTIVES: To report the long‐term follow‐up outcomes of masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development (DSD), including both physicians' and patients’ perspectives on appearance and functional outcome, including sexuality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 1040 adolescents (a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Grift, Tim C., Rapp, Marion, Holmdahl, Gundela, Duranteau, Lise, Nordenskjold, Agneta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33587786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15369
_version_ 1784749490926780416
author van de Grift, Tim C.
Rapp, Marion
Holmdahl, Gundela
Duranteau, Lise
Nordenskjold, Agneta
author_facet van de Grift, Tim C.
Rapp, Marion
Holmdahl, Gundela
Duranteau, Lise
Nordenskjold, Agneta
author_sort van de Grift, Tim C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To report the long‐term follow‐up outcomes of masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development (DSD), including both physicians' and patients’ perspectives on appearance and functional outcome, including sexuality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 1040 adolescents (age ≥16 years) and adults with a DSD took part in this multicentre cross‐sectional clinical study in six European countries in 2014/2015. Of those, 150 living in other than the female gender had some kind of masculinizing surgery: hypospadias repair, orchidopexy, breast reduction and/or gonadectomy. The study protocol included medical data collection, an optional genital examination, and patient‐reported outcomes including satisfaction with appearance and current sexual functioning. RESULTS: Diagnoses included partial and mixed gonadal dysgenesis (45,XO/46,XY; n = 38), Klinefelter syndrome/46,XX males (n = 57), and various 46,XY DSDs (n = 42; e.g. partial androgen insensitivity syndrome, severe hypospadias) and 13 with other diagnoses. Of the participants, 84 underwent hypospadias surgery, 86 orchidopexy, 52 gonadectomy and 32 breast reduction (combinations possible). Physicians evaluated anatomical appearance at genital examination as poor in approximately 11% of patients. After hypospadias surgery, 38% of participants reported that they were (very) dissatisfied with anatomical appearance and 20% with function. The physician and patient evaluations were moderately correlated (r = 0.43). CONCLUSION: The majority of participants were neutral to satisfied with the appearance and function in the long‐term after masculinizing surgery. Given the initial severe phenotype and a risk of unsatisfactory results after masculinizing surgery in DSD, treatment should be handled by experienced multidisciplinary teams in order to optimize the postoperative results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9292912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92929122022-07-20 Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function van de Grift, Tim C. Rapp, Marion Holmdahl, Gundela Duranteau, Lise Nordenskjold, Agneta BJU Int Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To report the long‐term follow‐up outcomes of masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development (DSD), including both physicians' and patients’ perspectives on appearance and functional outcome, including sexuality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 1040 adolescents (age ≥16 years) and adults with a DSD took part in this multicentre cross‐sectional clinical study in six European countries in 2014/2015. Of those, 150 living in other than the female gender had some kind of masculinizing surgery: hypospadias repair, orchidopexy, breast reduction and/or gonadectomy. The study protocol included medical data collection, an optional genital examination, and patient‐reported outcomes including satisfaction with appearance and current sexual functioning. RESULTS: Diagnoses included partial and mixed gonadal dysgenesis (45,XO/46,XY; n = 38), Klinefelter syndrome/46,XX males (n = 57), and various 46,XY DSDs (n = 42; e.g. partial androgen insensitivity syndrome, severe hypospadias) and 13 with other diagnoses. Of the participants, 84 underwent hypospadias surgery, 86 orchidopexy, 52 gonadectomy and 32 breast reduction (combinations possible). Physicians evaluated anatomical appearance at genital examination as poor in approximately 11% of patients. After hypospadias surgery, 38% of participants reported that they were (very) dissatisfied with anatomical appearance and 20% with function. The physician and patient evaluations were moderately correlated (r = 0.43). CONCLUSION: The majority of participants were neutral to satisfied with the appearance and function in the long‐term after masculinizing surgery. Given the initial severe phenotype and a risk of unsatisfactory results after masculinizing surgery in DSD, treatment should be handled by experienced multidisciplinary teams in order to optimize the postoperative results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-31 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9292912/ /pubmed/33587786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15369 Text en © 2021 The Authors BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
van de Grift, Tim C.
Rapp, Marion
Holmdahl, Gundela
Duranteau, Lise
Nordenskjold, Agneta
Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function
title Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function
title_full Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function
title_fullStr Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function
title_full_unstemmed Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function
title_short Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function
title_sort masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician‐ and participant‐evaluated appearance and function
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9292912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33587786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.15369
work_keys_str_mv AT vandegrifttimc masculinizingsurgeryindisordersdifferencesofsexdevelopmentclinicianandparticipantevaluatedappearanceandfunction
AT rappmarion masculinizingsurgeryindisordersdifferencesofsexdevelopmentclinicianandparticipantevaluatedappearanceandfunction
AT holmdahlgundela masculinizingsurgeryindisordersdifferencesofsexdevelopmentclinicianandparticipantevaluatedappearanceandfunction
AT duranteaulise masculinizingsurgeryindisordersdifferencesofsexdevelopmentclinicianandparticipantevaluatedappearanceandfunction
AT nordenskjoldagneta masculinizingsurgeryindisordersdifferencesofsexdevelopmentclinicianandparticipantevaluatedappearanceandfunction
AT masculinizingsurgeryindisordersdifferencesofsexdevelopmentclinicianandparticipantevaluatedappearanceandfunction