Cargando…
A field spray drift study to determine the downwind effects of isoxaflutole herbicide to nontarget plants
Spray drift buffers are often required on herbicide labels to prevent potential drift effects to nontarget plants. Buffers are typically derived by determining the distance at which predicted exposure from spray drift equals the ecotoxicology threshold for sensitive plant species determined in green...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34383375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4508 |
_version_ | 1784749541790056448 |
---|---|
author | Moore, Dwayne R. J. Priest, Colleen D. Brayden, Ben H. Hanzas, John P. Arpino, Meghan R. Richardson, Leif Stryker, Jody Banman, Chris Rodney, Sara I. Chapple, Andrew Hall, Tilghman Isemer, Rena Ortego, Lisa Rodea‐Palomares, Ismael Tang, Jane Wang, Mengyuan Xu, Tianbo Yang, Yaning |
author_facet | Moore, Dwayne R. J. Priest, Colleen D. Brayden, Ben H. Hanzas, John P. Arpino, Meghan R. Richardson, Leif Stryker, Jody Banman, Chris Rodney, Sara I. Chapple, Andrew Hall, Tilghman Isemer, Rena Ortego, Lisa Rodea‐Palomares, Ismael Tang, Jane Wang, Mengyuan Xu, Tianbo Yang, Yaning |
author_sort | Moore, Dwayne R. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spray drift buffers are often required on herbicide labels to prevent potential drift effects to nontarget plants. Buffers are typically derived by determining the distance at which predicted exposure from spray drift equals the ecotoxicology threshold for sensitive plant species determined in greenhouse tests. Field studies performed under realistic conditions have demonstrated, however, that this approach is far more conservative than necessary. In 2016, the US Environmental Protection Agency estimated that isoxaflutole (IFT), a herbicide used to control grass and broadleaf weeds, could adversely affect downwind nontarget dicot plants at distances of ≥304 m from the edge of the treated field due to spray drift. This prediction implies that a buffer of at least 304 m is required to protect nontarget plants. To refine the predicted buffer distance for IFT, we conducted a field study in which sensitive nontarget plants (lettuce and navy bean, two to four leaf stage) were placed at various distances downwind from previously harvested soybean fields sprayed with Balance(®) Flexx Herbicide. The test plants were then transported to a greenhouse for grow out following the standard vegetative vigor test protocol. There were three trials. One had vegetation in the downwind deposition area (i.e., test plants placed in mowed grass; typical exposure scenario) and two had bare ground deposition areas (worst‐case exposure scenario). For both plant species in bare ground deposition areas, effects on shoot height and weight were observed at 1.52 m but not at downwind distances of ≥9.14 m from the edge of the treated area. No effects were observed at any distance for plants placed in the vegetated deposition area. The field study demonstrated that a buffer of 9.14 m protects nontarget terrestrial plants exposed to IFT via spray drift even under worst‐case conditions. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:757–769. © 2021 Bayer. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9293113 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92931132022-07-20 A field spray drift study to determine the downwind effects of isoxaflutole herbicide to nontarget plants Moore, Dwayne R. J. Priest, Colleen D. Brayden, Ben H. Hanzas, John P. Arpino, Meghan R. Richardson, Leif Stryker, Jody Banman, Chris Rodney, Sara I. Chapple, Andrew Hall, Tilghman Isemer, Rena Ortego, Lisa Rodea‐Palomares, Ismael Tang, Jane Wang, Mengyuan Xu, Tianbo Yang, Yaning Integr Environ Assess Manag Health & Ecological Risk Assessment Spray drift buffers are often required on herbicide labels to prevent potential drift effects to nontarget plants. Buffers are typically derived by determining the distance at which predicted exposure from spray drift equals the ecotoxicology threshold for sensitive plant species determined in greenhouse tests. Field studies performed under realistic conditions have demonstrated, however, that this approach is far more conservative than necessary. In 2016, the US Environmental Protection Agency estimated that isoxaflutole (IFT), a herbicide used to control grass and broadleaf weeds, could adversely affect downwind nontarget dicot plants at distances of ≥304 m from the edge of the treated field due to spray drift. This prediction implies that a buffer of at least 304 m is required to protect nontarget plants. To refine the predicted buffer distance for IFT, we conducted a field study in which sensitive nontarget plants (lettuce and navy bean, two to four leaf stage) were placed at various distances downwind from previously harvested soybean fields sprayed with Balance(®) Flexx Herbicide. The test plants were then transported to a greenhouse for grow out following the standard vegetative vigor test protocol. There were three trials. One had vegetation in the downwind deposition area (i.e., test plants placed in mowed grass; typical exposure scenario) and two had bare ground deposition areas (worst‐case exposure scenario). For both plant species in bare ground deposition areas, effects on shoot height and weight were observed at 1.52 m but not at downwind distances of ≥9.14 m from the edge of the treated area. No effects were observed at any distance for plants placed in the vegetated deposition area. The field study demonstrated that a buffer of 9.14 m protects nontarget terrestrial plants exposed to IFT via spray drift even under worst‐case conditions. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2022;18:757–769. © 2021 Bayer. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-16 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9293113/ /pubmed/34383375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4508 Text en © 2021 Bayer. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Health & Ecological Risk Assessment Moore, Dwayne R. J. Priest, Colleen D. Brayden, Ben H. Hanzas, John P. Arpino, Meghan R. Richardson, Leif Stryker, Jody Banman, Chris Rodney, Sara I. Chapple, Andrew Hall, Tilghman Isemer, Rena Ortego, Lisa Rodea‐Palomares, Ismael Tang, Jane Wang, Mengyuan Xu, Tianbo Yang, Yaning A field spray drift study to determine the downwind effects of isoxaflutole herbicide to nontarget plants |
title | A field spray drift study to determine the downwind effects of isoxaflutole herbicide to nontarget plants |
title_full | A field spray drift study to determine the downwind effects of isoxaflutole herbicide to nontarget plants |
title_fullStr | A field spray drift study to determine the downwind effects of isoxaflutole herbicide to nontarget plants |
title_full_unstemmed | A field spray drift study to determine the downwind effects of isoxaflutole herbicide to nontarget plants |
title_short | A field spray drift study to determine the downwind effects of isoxaflutole herbicide to nontarget plants |
title_sort | field spray drift study to determine the downwind effects of isoxaflutole herbicide to nontarget plants |
topic | Health & Ecological Risk Assessment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34383375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4508 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mooredwaynerj afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT priestcolleend afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT braydenbenh afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT hanzasjohnp afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT arpinomeghanr afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT richardsonleif afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT strykerjody afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT banmanchris afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT rodneysarai afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT chappleandrew afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT halltilghman afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT isemerrena afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT ortegolisa afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT rodeapalomaresismael afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT tangjane afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT wangmengyuan afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT xutianbo afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT yangyaning afieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT mooredwaynerj fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT priestcolleend fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT braydenbenh fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT hanzasjohnp fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT arpinomeghanr fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT richardsonleif fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT strykerjody fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT banmanchris fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT rodneysarai fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT chappleandrew fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT halltilghman fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT isemerrena fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT ortegolisa fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT rodeapalomaresismael fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT tangjane fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT wangmengyuan fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT xutianbo fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants AT yangyaning fieldspraydriftstudytodeterminethedownwindeffectsofisoxaflutoleherbicidetonontargetplants |