Cargando…

Smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women attending treatment for substance use disorders: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Up to 95% of pregnant women seeking treatment for alcohol and other drug (AOD) use smoke tobacco. Previous reviews indicate few effective smoking cessation treatments for this group. This updated review aimed to identify and measure the efficacy of smoking cessation intervention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jackson, Melissa A., Baker, Amanda L., Gould, Gillian S., Brown, Amanda L., Dunlop, Adrian J., McCarter, Kristen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34374145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15663
_version_ 1784749548120309760
author Jackson, Melissa A.
Baker, Amanda L.
Gould, Gillian S.
Brown, Amanda L.
Dunlop, Adrian J.
McCarter, Kristen
author_facet Jackson, Melissa A.
Baker, Amanda L.
Gould, Gillian S.
Brown, Amanda L.
Dunlop, Adrian J.
McCarter, Kristen
author_sort Jackson, Melissa A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Up to 95% of pregnant women seeking treatment for alcohol and other drug (AOD) use smoke tobacco. Previous reviews indicate few effective smoking cessation treatments for this group. This updated review aimed to identify and measure the efficacy of smoking cessation interventions trialled among pregnant women in AOD treatment settings who smoke tobacco. METHODS: A narrative synthesis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses statement. Studies involving psychological, behavioural or pharmacological interventions used to treat tobacco use, including electronic nicotine delivery systems, for pregnant women of any age, who smoked tobacco and were seeking/receiving treatment, or in post‐treatment recovery for AOD concerns, were reviewed. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and ProQuest databases, grey literature and reference lists were searched, and field experts were contacted for unpublished study data. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool assessed study quality. The review was pre‐registered with PROSPERO no. CRD42018108777. RESULTS: Seven interventions (two randomised controlled trials, two single‐arm pilot studies, two program evaluations and one causal comparative study) treating 875 women were identified. All were United States (US)‐based and targeted women with drug dependence, but not alcohol dependence. Three interventions used contingency management, five provided behavioural counselling, and one offered nicotine replacement therapy. All reported reductions in cigarette consumption; one contingency management‐based study demonstrated higher abstinence rates compared with controls at treatment‐end that were not maintained at follow‐up. Four of six studies were rated as methodologically weak and one unpublished study was not rated. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions about the efficacy of smoking interventions for pregnant women with alcohol and other drug concerns who also smoke tobacco are hindered by the paucity of available data and poor methodological quality of included studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9293139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92931392022-07-20 Smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women attending treatment for substance use disorders: A systematic review Jackson, Melissa A. Baker, Amanda L. Gould, Gillian S. Brown, Amanda L. Dunlop, Adrian J. McCarter, Kristen Addiction Reviews BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Up to 95% of pregnant women seeking treatment for alcohol and other drug (AOD) use smoke tobacco. Previous reviews indicate few effective smoking cessation treatments for this group. This updated review aimed to identify and measure the efficacy of smoking cessation interventions trialled among pregnant women in AOD treatment settings who smoke tobacco. METHODS: A narrative synthesis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses statement. Studies involving psychological, behavioural or pharmacological interventions used to treat tobacco use, including electronic nicotine delivery systems, for pregnant women of any age, who smoked tobacco and were seeking/receiving treatment, or in post‐treatment recovery for AOD concerns, were reviewed. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and ProQuest databases, grey literature and reference lists were searched, and field experts were contacted for unpublished study data. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool assessed study quality. The review was pre‐registered with PROSPERO no. CRD42018108777. RESULTS: Seven interventions (two randomised controlled trials, two single‐arm pilot studies, two program evaluations and one causal comparative study) treating 875 women were identified. All were United States (US)‐based and targeted women with drug dependence, but not alcohol dependence. Three interventions used contingency management, five provided behavioural counselling, and one offered nicotine replacement therapy. All reported reductions in cigarette consumption; one contingency management‐based study demonstrated higher abstinence rates compared with controls at treatment‐end that were not maintained at follow‐up. Four of six studies were rated as methodologically weak and one unpublished study was not rated. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions about the efficacy of smoking interventions for pregnant women with alcohol and other drug concerns who also smoke tobacco are hindered by the paucity of available data and poor methodological quality of included studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-28 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9293139/ /pubmed/34374145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15663 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Reviews
Jackson, Melissa A.
Baker, Amanda L.
Gould, Gillian S.
Brown, Amanda L.
Dunlop, Adrian J.
McCarter, Kristen
Smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women attending treatment for substance use disorders: A systematic review
title Smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women attending treatment for substance use disorders: A systematic review
title_full Smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women attending treatment for substance use disorders: A systematic review
title_fullStr Smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women attending treatment for substance use disorders: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women attending treatment for substance use disorders: A systematic review
title_short Smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women attending treatment for substance use disorders: A systematic review
title_sort smoking cessation interventions for pregnant women attending treatment for substance use disorders: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34374145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15663
work_keys_str_mv AT jacksonmelissaa smokingcessationinterventionsforpregnantwomenattendingtreatmentforsubstanceusedisordersasystematicreview
AT bakeramandal smokingcessationinterventionsforpregnantwomenattendingtreatmentforsubstanceusedisordersasystematicreview
AT gouldgillians smokingcessationinterventionsforpregnantwomenattendingtreatmentforsubstanceusedisordersasystematicreview
AT brownamandal smokingcessationinterventionsforpregnantwomenattendingtreatmentforsubstanceusedisordersasystematicreview
AT dunlopadrianj smokingcessationinterventionsforpregnantwomenattendingtreatmentforsubstanceusedisordersasystematicreview
AT mccarterkristen smokingcessationinterventionsforpregnantwomenattendingtreatmentforsubstanceusedisordersasystematicreview