Cargando…

Comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM: To determine how varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and electronic cigarettes compare with respect to their clinical effectiveness and safety. METHOD: Systematic reviews and Bayesian network meta‐analyses of randomized controlled trials, in any setting, of varenicline, b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Kyla H., Dalili, Michael N., López‐López, José A., Keeney, Edna, Phillippo, David M., Munafò, Marcus R., Stevenson, Matt, Caldwell, Deborah M., Welton, Nicky J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15675
_version_ 1784749558274719744
author Thomas, Kyla H.
Dalili, Michael N.
López‐López, José A.
Keeney, Edna
Phillippo, David M.
Munafò, Marcus R.
Stevenson, Matt
Caldwell, Deborah M.
Welton, Nicky J.
author_facet Thomas, Kyla H.
Dalili, Michael N.
López‐López, José A.
Keeney, Edna
Phillippo, David M.
Munafò, Marcus R.
Stevenson, Matt
Caldwell, Deborah M.
Welton, Nicky J.
author_sort Thomas, Kyla H.
collection PubMed
description AIM: To determine how varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and electronic cigarettes compare with respect to their clinical effectiveness and safety. METHOD: Systematic reviews and Bayesian network meta‐analyses of randomized controlled trials, in any setting, of varenicline, bupropion, NRT and e‐cigarettes (in high, standard and low doses, alone or in combination) in adult smokers and smokeless tobacco users with follow‐up duration of 24 weeks or greater (effectiveness) or any duration (safety). Nine databases were searched until 19 February 2019. Primary outcomes were sustained tobacco abstinence and serious adverse events (SAEs). We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and treatment rankings and conducted meta‐regression to explore covariates. RESULTS: We identified 363 trials for effectiveness and 355 for safety. Most monotherapies and combination therapies were more effective than placebo at helping participants to achieve sustained abstinence; the most effective of these, estimated with some imprecision, were varenicline standard [OR = 2.83, 95% credible interval (CrI) = 2.34–3.39] and varenicline standard + NRT standard (OR = 5.75, 95% CrI = 2.27–14.88). Estimates were higher in smokers receiving counselling than in those without and in studies with higher baseline nicotine dependence scores than in those with lower scores. Varenicline standard + NRT standard showed a high probability of being ranked best or second‐best. For safety, only bupropion at standard dose increased the odds of experiencing SAEs compared with placebo (OR = 1.27, 95% CrI = 1.04–1.58), and we found no evidence of effect modification. CONCLUSIONS: Most tobacco cessation monotherapies and combination therapies are more effective than placebo at helping participants to achieve sustained abstinence, with varenicline appearing to be most effective based on current evidence. There does not appear to be strong evidence of associations between most tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and adverse events; however, the data are limited and there is a need for improved reporting of safety data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9293179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92931792022-07-20 Comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials Thomas, Kyla H. Dalili, Michael N. López‐López, José A. Keeney, Edna Phillippo, David M. Munafò, Marcus R. Stevenson, Matt Caldwell, Deborah M. Welton, Nicky J. Addiction Reviews AIM: To determine how varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and electronic cigarettes compare with respect to their clinical effectiveness and safety. METHOD: Systematic reviews and Bayesian network meta‐analyses of randomized controlled trials, in any setting, of varenicline, bupropion, NRT and e‐cigarettes (in high, standard and low doses, alone or in combination) in adult smokers and smokeless tobacco users with follow‐up duration of 24 weeks or greater (effectiveness) or any duration (safety). Nine databases were searched until 19 February 2019. Primary outcomes were sustained tobacco abstinence and serious adverse events (SAEs). We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and treatment rankings and conducted meta‐regression to explore covariates. RESULTS: We identified 363 trials for effectiveness and 355 for safety. Most monotherapies and combination therapies were more effective than placebo at helping participants to achieve sustained abstinence; the most effective of these, estimated with some imprecision, were varenicline standard [OR = 2.83, 95% credible interval (CrI) = 2.34–3.39] and varenicline standard + NRT standard (OR = 5.75, 95% CrI = 2.27–14.88). Estimates were higher in smokers receiving counselling than in those without and in studies with higher baseline nicotine dependence scores than in those with lower scores. Varenicline standard + NRT standard showed a high probability of being ranked best or second‐best. For safety, only bupropion at standard dose increased the odds of experiencing SAEs compared with placebo (OR = 1.27, 95% CrI = 1.04–1.58), and we found no evidence of effect modification. CONCLUSIONS: Most tobacco cessation monotherapies and combination therapies are more effective than placebo at helping participants to achieve sustained abstinence, with varenicline appearing to be most effective based on current evidence. There does not appear to be strong evidence of associations between most tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and adverse events; however, the data are limited and there is a need for improved reporting of safety data. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-11 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9293179/ /pubmed/34636108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15675 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Thomas, Kyla H.
Dalili, Michael N.
López‐López, José A.
Keeney, Edna
Phillippo, David M.
Munafò, Marcus R.
Stevenson, Matt
Caldwell, Deborah M.
Welton, Nicky J.
Comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies and electronic cigarettes: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34636108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15675
work_keys_str_mv AT thomaskylah comparativeclinicaleffectivenessandsafetyoftobaccocessationpharmacotherapiesandelectroniccigarettesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT dalilimichaeln comparativeclinicaleffectivenessandsafetyoftobaccocessationpharmacotherapiesandelectroniccigarettesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lopezlopezjosea comparativeclinicaleffectivenessandsafetyoftobaccocessationpharmacotherapiesandelectroniccigarettesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT keeneyedna comparativeclinicaleffectivenessandsafetyoftobaccocessationpharmacotherapiesandelectroniccigarettesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT phillippodavidm comparativeclinicaleffectivenessandsafetyoftobaccocessationpharmacotherapiesandelectroniccigarettesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT munafomarcusr comparativeclinicaleffectivenessandsafetyoftobaccocessationpharmacotherapiesandelectroniccigarettesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT stevensonmatt comparativeclinicaleffectivenessandsafetyoftobaccocessationpharmacotherapiesandelectroniccigarettesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT caldwelldeborahm comparativeclinicaleffectivenessandsafetyoftobaccocessationpharmacotherapiesandelectroniccigarettesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT weltonnickyj comparativeclinicaleffectivenessandsafetyoftobaccocessationpharmacotherapiesandelectroniccigarettesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials