Cargando…
Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study
BACKGROUND: Intracardiac electrogram data remain one of the primary diagnostic inputs guiding complex ablation procedures. However, the technology to collect, process, and display intracardiac signals has known shortcomings and has not advanced in several decades. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15250 |
_version_ | 1784749562633650176 |
---|---|
author | Al‐Ahmad, Amin Knight, Bradley Tzou, Wendy Schaller, Robert Yasin, Omar Padmanabhan, Deepak Zagrodzky, Jason Bassiouny, Mohammed Burkhardt, J. David Gallinghouse, G. Joseph Mansour, Moussa McLeod, Christopher Natale, Andrea |
author_facet | Al‐Ahmad, Amin Knight, Bradley Tzou, Wendy Schaller, Robert Yasin, Omar Padmanabhan, Deepak Zagrodzky, Jason Bassiouny, Mohammed Burkhardt, J. David Gallinghouse, G. Joseph Mansour, Moussa McLeod, Christopher Natale, Andrea |
author_sort | Al‐Ahmad, Amin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intracardiac electrogram data remain one of the primary diagnostic inputs guiding complex ablation procedures. However, the technology to collect, process, and display intracardiac signals has known shortcomings and has not advanced in several decades. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new signal processing platform, the PURE EP™ system (PURE), in a multi‐center, prospective study. METHODS: Intracardiac signal data of clinical interest were collected from 51 patients undergoing ablation procedures with PURE, the signal recording system, and the 3D mapping system at the same time stamps. The samples were randomized and subjected to blinded, controlled evaluation by three independent electrophysiologists to determine the overall quality and clinical utility of PURE signals when compared to conventional sources. Each reviewer assessed the same (92) signal sample sets and responded to (235) questions using a 10‐point rating scale. If two or more reviewers rated the PURE signal higher than the control, it was deemed superior. RESULTS: A total of 93% of question responses showed consensus amongst the blinded reviewers. Based on the ratings for each pair of signals, a cumulative total of 164 PURE signals out of 218 (75.2%) were statistically rated as Superior for this data set (p < .001). Only 14 PURE signals out of 218 were rated as Inferior (6.4%). CONCLUSION: The PURE intracardiac signals were statistically rated as superior when compared to conventional systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9293197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92931972022-07-20 Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study Al‐Ahmad, Amin Knight, Bradley Tzou, Wendy Schaller, Robert Yasin, Omar Padmanabhan, Deepak Zagrodzky, Jason Bassiouny, Mohammed Burkhardt, J. David Gallinghouse, G. Joseph Mansour, Moussa McLeod, Christopher Natale, Andrea J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Featured Articles BACKGROUND: Intracardiac electrogram data remain one of the primary diagnostic inputs guiding complex ablation procedures. However, the technology to collect, process, and display intracardiac signals has known shortcomings and has not advanced in several decades. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new signal processing platform, the PURE EP™ system (PURE), in a multi‐center, prospective study. METHODS: Intracardiac signal data of clinical interest were collected from 51 patients undergoing ablation procedures with PURE, the signal recording system, and the 3D mapping system at the same time stamps. The samples were randomized and subjected to blinded, controlled evaluation by three independent electrophysiologists to determine the overall quality and clinical utility of PURE signals when compared to conventional sources. Each reviewer assessed the same (92) signal sample sets and responded to (235) questions using a 10‐point rating scale. If two or more reviewers rated the PURE signal higher than the control, it was deemed superior. RESULTS: A total of 93% of question responses showed consensus amongst the blinded reviewers. Based on the ratings for each pair of signals, a cumulative total of 164 PURE signals out of 218 (75.2%) were statistically rated as Superior for this data set (p < .001). Only 14 PURE signals out of 218 were rated as Inferior (6.4%). CONCLUSION: The PURE intracardiac signals were statistically rated as superior when compared to conventional systems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-01 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9293197/ /pubmed/34554634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15250 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Featured Articles Al‐Ahmad, Amin Knight, Bradley Tzou, Wendy Schaller, Robert Yasin, Omar Padmanabhan, Deepak Zagrodzky, Jason Bassiouny, Mohammed Burkhardt, J. David Gallinghouse, G. Joseph Mansour, Moussa McLeod, Christopher Natale, Andrea Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study |
title | Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study |
title_full | Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study |
title_short | Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study |
title_sort | evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: the pure ep 2.0 study |
topic | Featured Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alahmadamin evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study AT knightbradley evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study AT tzouwendy evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study AT schallerrobert evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study AT yasinomar evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study AT padmanabhandeepak evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study AT zagrodzkyjason evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study AT bassiounymohammed evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study AT burkhardtjdavid evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study AT gallinghousegjoseph evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study AT mansourmoussa evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study AT mcleodchristopher evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study AT nataleandrea evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study |