Cargando…

Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study

BACKGROUND: Intracardiac electrogram data remain one of the primary diagnostic inputs guiding complex ablation procedures. However, the technology to collect, process, and display intracardiac signals has known shortcomings and has not advanced in several decades. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al‐Ahmad, Amin, Knight, Bradley, Tzou, Wendy, Schaller, Robert, Yasin, Omar, Padmanabhan, Deepak, Zagrodzky, Jason, Bassiouny, Mohammed, Burkhardt, J. David, Gallinghouse, G. Joseph, Mansour, Moussa, McLeod, Christopher, Natale, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15250
_version_ 1784749562633650176
author Al‐Ahmad, Amin
Knight, Bradley
Tzou, Wendy
Schaller, Robert
Yasin, Omar
Padmanabhan, Deepak
Zagrodzky, Jason
Bassiouny, Mohammed
Burkhardt, J. David
Gallinghouse, G. Joseph
Mansour, Moussa
McLeod, Christopher
Natale, Andrea
author_facet Al‐Ahmad, Amin
Knight, Bradley
Tzou, Wendy
Schaller, Robert
Yasin, Omar
Padmanabhan, Deepak
Zagrodzky, Jason
Bassiouny, Mohammed
Burkhardt, J. David
Gallinghouse, G. Joseph
Mansour, Moussa
McLeod, Christopher
Natale, Andrea
author_sort Al‐Ahmad, Amin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intracardiac electrogram data remain one of the primary diagnostic inputs guiding complex ablation procedures. However, the technology to collect, process, and display intracardiac signals has known shortcomings and has not advanced in several decades. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new signal processing platform, the PURE EP™ system (PURE), in a multi‐center, prospective study. METHODS: Intracardiac signal data of clinical interest were collected from 51 patients undergoing ablation procedures with PURE, the signal recording system, and the 3D mapping system at the same time stamps. The samples were randomized and subjected to blinded, controlled evaluation by three independent electrophysiologists to determine the overall quality and clinical utility of PURE signals when compared to conventional sources. Each reviewer assessed the same (92) signal sample sets and responded to (235) questions using a 10‐point rating scale. If two or more reviewers rated the PURE signal higher than the control, it was deemed superior. RESULTS: A total of 93% of question responses showed consensus amongst the blinded reviewers. Based on the ratings for each pair of signals, a cumulative total of 164 PURE signals out of 218 (75.2%) were statistically rated as Superior for this data set (p < .001). Only 14 PURE signals out of 218 were rated as Inferior (6.4%). CONCLUSION: The PURE intracardiac signals were statistically rated as superior when compared to conventional systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9293197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92931972022-07-20 Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study Al‐Ahmad, Amin Knight, Bradley Tzou, Wendy Schaller, Robert Yasin, Omar Padmanabhan, Deepak Zagrodzky, Jason Bassiouny, Mohammed Burkhardt, J. David Gallinghouse, G. Joseph Mansour, Moussa McLeod, Christopher Natale, Andrea J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Featured Articles BACKGROUND: Intracardiac electrogram data remain one of the primary diagnostic inputs guiding complex ablation procedures. However, the technology to collect, process, and display intracardiac signals has known shortcomings and has not advanced in several decades. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new signal processing platform, the PURE EP™ system (PURE), in a multi‐center, prospective study. METHODS: Intracardiac signal data of clinical interest were collected from 51 patients undergoing ablation procedures with PURE, the signal recording system, and the 3D mapping system at the same time stamps. The samples were randomized and subjected to blinded, controlled evaluation by three independent electrophysiologists to determine the overall quality and clinical utility of PURE signals when compared to conventional sources. Each reviewer assessed the same (92) signal sample sets and responded to (235) questions using a 10‐point rating scale. If two or more reviewers rated the PURE signal higher than the control, it was deemed superior. RESULTS: A total of 93% of question responses showed consensus amongst the blinded reviewers. Based on the ratings for each pair of signals, a cumulative total of 164 PURE signals out of 218 (75.2%) were statistically rated as Superior for this data set (p < .001). Only 14 PURE signals out of 218 were rated as Inferior (6.4%). CONCLUSION: The PURE intracardiac signals were statistically rated as superior when compared to conventional systems. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-01 2021-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9293197/ /pubmed/34554634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15250 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Featured Articles
Al‐Ahmad, Amin
Knight, Bradley
Tzou, Wendy
Schaller, Robert
Yasin, Omar
Padmanabhan, Deepak
Zagrodzky, Jason
Bassiouny, Mohammed
Burkhardt, J. David
Gallinghouse, G. Joseph
Mansour, Moussa
McLeod, Christopher
Natale, Andrea
Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study
title Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study
title_full Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study
title_fullStr Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study
title_short Evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: The PURE EP 2.0 study
title_sort evaluation of a novel cardiac signal processing system for electrophysiology procedures: the pure ep 2.0 study
topic Featured Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.15250
work_keys_str_mv AT alahmadamin evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study
AT knightbradley evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study
AT tzouwendy evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study
AT schallerrobert evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study
AT yasinomar evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study
AT padmanabhandeepak evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study
AT zagrodzkyjason evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study
AT bassiounymohammed evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study
AT burkhardtjdavid evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study
AT gallinghousegjoseph evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study
AT mansourmoussa evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study
AT mcleodchristopher evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study
AT nataleandrea evaluationofanovelcardiacsignalprocessingsystemforelectrophysiologyproceduresthepureep20study