Cargando…

Increased nuchal translucency before 11 weeks of gestation: Reason for referral?

OBJECTIVES: In this era of non‐invasive‐prenatal testing (NIPT), when dating scans are usually performed around 10 weeks of gestation, an increased NT before the official established timeframe (CRL between 45 and 84 mm) may be encountered. Information on management of these pregnancies is limited. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lugthart, Malou A., Bet, Bo B., Elsman, Fleur, van de Kamp, Karline, de Bakker, Bernadette S., Linskens, Ingeborg H., van Maarle, Merel C., van Leeuwen, Elisabeth, Pajkrt, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34592002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.6054
_version_ 1784749594780893184
author Lugthart, Malou A.
Bet, Bo B.
Elsman, Fleur
van de Kamp, Karline
de Bakker, Bernadette S.
Linskens, Ingeborg H.
van Maarle, Merel C.
van Leeuwen, Elisabeth
Pajkrt, Eva
author_facet Lugthart, Malou A.
Bet, Bo B.
Elsman, Fleur
van de Kamp, Karline
de Bakker, Bernadette S.
Linskens, Ingeborg H.
van Maarle, Merel C.
van Leeuwen, Elisabeth
Pajkrt, Eva
author_sort Lugthart, Malou A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In this era of non‐invasive‐prenatal testing (NIPT), when dating scans are usually performed around 10 weeks of gestation, an increased NT before the official established timeframe (CRL between 45 and 84 mm) may be encountered. Information on management of these pregnancies is limited. Therefore, we evaluated the relationship between an early increased NT and adverse pregnancy outcome. Secondary, we evaluated the rate of chromosomal anomalies that might have been missed in first trimester should solely NIPT be performed as first‐tier test, and the rate of adverse pregnancy outcome if NT normalizes before 14 weeks. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study that included all pregnancies between January 1, 2007 and June 1, 2020 in Amsterdam UMC locations AMC and VUmc. We included fetuses with a crown‐rump length (CRL) < 45 mm (∼11 weeks) and a nuchal translucency (NT) measurement ≥2.5 mm. Fetuses referred with an early increased NT and a major fetal anomaly at the dating scan were excluded, as were cases of parents with a family history of monogenetic disease(s) or recognized carriers of a balanced translocation. RESULTS: We included 120 fetuses of which 66.7% (80/120) had an adverse pregnancy outcome. Congenital anomalies were present in 56.7% (68/120), 45.8% (55/120) had a chromosomal anomaly. The prevalence of congenital anomalies was 30.3% in fetuses with NT 2.5–3.4 mm compared to 66.7% with NT ≥ 3.5 mm (p < 0.001). 16.7% (20/120) had a chromosomal anomaly that might have been missed by conventional NIPT in first trimester. We found an adverse pregnancy outcome of 24% in the group with a normalized NT compared to 78.1% in the group with a persistently increased NT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An early increased NT should make the sonographer alert. In this selected cohort, an early increased NT was associated with a high probability of having an adverse pregnancy outcome. Regardless of CRL, we deem that an early increased NT ≥ 3.5 mm warrants referral to a Fetal Medicine Unit for an extensive work‐up. NT normalization seems favorable, but a prospective study should define the appropriate work‐up for NT in the lower range (2.5–3.4 mm).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9293299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92932992022-07-20 Increased nuchal translucency before 11 weeks of gestation: Reason for referral? Lugthart, Malou A. Bet, Bo B. Elsman, Fleur van de Kamp, Karline de Bakker, Bernadette S. Linskens, Ingeborg H. van Maarle, Merel C. van Leeuwen, Elisabeth Pajkrt, Eva Prenat Diagn Original Articles OBJECTIVES: In this era of non‐invasive‐prenatal testing (NIPT), when dating scans are usually performed around 10 weeks of gestation, an increased NT before the official established timeframe (CRL between 45 and 84 mm) may be encountered. Information on management of these pregnancies is limited. Therefore, we evaluated the relationship between an early increased NT and adverse pregnancy outcome. Secondary, we evaluated the rate of chromosomal anomalies that might have been missed in first trimester should solely NIPT be performed as first‐tier test, and the rate of adverse pregnancy outcome if NT normalizes before 14 weeks. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study that included all pregnancies between January 1, 2007 and June 1, 2020 in Amsterdam UMC locations AMC and VUmc. We included fetuses with a crown‐rump length (CRL) < 45 mm (∼11 weeks) and a nuchal translucency (NT) measurement ≥2.5 mm. Fetuses referred with an early increased NT and a major fetal anomaly at the dating scan were excluded, as were cases of parents with a family history of monogenetic disease(s) or recognized carriers of a balanced translocation. RESULTS: We included 120 fetuses of which 66.7% (80/120) had an adverse pregnancy outcome. Congenital anomalies were present in 56.7% (68/120), 45.8% (55/120) had a chromosomal anomaly. The prevalence of congenital anomalies was 30.3% in fetuses with NT 2.5–3.4 mm compared to 66.7% with NT ≥ 3.5 mm (p < 0.001). 16.7% (20/120) had a chromosomal anomaly that might have been missed by conventional NIPT in first trimester. We found an adverse pregnancy outcome of 24% in the group with a normalized NT compared to 78.1% in the group with a persistently increased NT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An early increased NT should make the sonographer alert. In this selected cohort, an early increased NT was associated with a high probability of having an adverse pregnancy outcome. Regardless of CRL, we deem that an early increased NT ≥ 3.5 mm warrants referral to a Fetal Medicine Unit for an extensive work‐up. NT normalization seems favorable, but a prospective study should define the appropriate work‐up for NT in the lower range (2.5–3.4 mm). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-08 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9293299/ /pubmed/34592002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.6054 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lugthart, Malou A.
Bet, Bo B.
Elsman, Fleur
van de Kamp, Karline
de Bakker, Bernadette S.
Linskens, Ingeborg H.
van Maarle, Merel C.
van Leeuwen, Elisabeth
Pajkrt, Eva
Increased nuchal translucency before 11 weeks of gestation: Reason for referral?
title Increased nuchal translucency before 11 weeks of gestation: Reason for referral?
title_full Increased nuchal translucency before 11 weeks of gestation: Reason for referral?
title_fullStr Increased nuchal translucency before 11 weeks of gestation: Reason for referral?
title_full_unstemmed Increased nuchal translucency before 11 weeks of gestation: Reason for referral?
title_short Increased nuchal translucency before 11 weeks of gestation: Reason for referral?
title_sort increased nuchal translucency before 11 weeks of gestation: reason for referral?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34592002
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.6054
work_keys_str_mv AT lugthartmaloua increasednuchaltranslucencybefore11weeksofgestationreasonforreferral
AT betbob increasednuchaltranslucencybefore11weeksofgestationreasonforreferral
AT elsmanfleur increasednuchaltranslucencybefore11weeksofgestationreasonforreferral
AT vandekampkarline increasednuchaltranslucencybefore11weeksofgestationreasonforreferral
AT debakkerbernadettes increasednuchaltranslucencybefore11weeksofgestationreasonforreferral
AT linskensingeborgh increasednuchaltranslucencybefore11weeksofgestationreasonforreferral
AT vanmaarlemerelc increasednuchaltranslucencybefore11weeksofgestationreasonforreferral
AT vanleeuwenelisabeth increasednuchaltranslucencybefore11weeksofgestationreasonforreferral
AT pajkrteva increasednuchaltranslucencybefore11weeksofgestationreasonforreferral