Cargando…

Tilapia Lake Virus was not detected in non‐tilapine species within tilapia polyculture systems of Bangladesh

Sixteen countries, including Bangladesh, have reported the presence of tilapia lake virus (TiLV), an emerging tilapia pathogen. Fish polyculture is a common farming practice in Bangladesh. Some unusual mortalities reported in species co‐cultivated with TiLV‐infected tilapia led us to investigate whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Debnath, Partho Pratim, Dinh‐Hung, Nguyen, Taengphu, Suwimon, Nguyen, Vuong Viet, Delamare‐Deboutteville, Jerome, Senapin, Saengchan, Vishnumurthy Mohan, Chadag, Dong, Ha Thanh, Rodkhum, Channarong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13537
_version_ 1784749604685742080
author Debnath, Partho Pratim
Dinh‐Hung, Nguyen
Taengphu, Suwimon
Nguyen, Vuong Viet
Delamare‐Deboutteville, Jerome
Senapin, Saengchan
Vishnumurthy Mohan, Chadag
Dong, Ha Thanh
Rodkhum, Channarong
author_facet Debnath, Partho Pratim
Dinh‐Hung, Nguyen
Taengphu, Suwimon
Nguyen, Vuong Viet
Delamare‐Deboutteville, Jerome
Senapin, Saengchan
Vishnumurthy Mohan, Chadag
Dong, Ha Thanh
Rodkhum, Channarong
author_sort Debnath, Partho Pratim
collection PubMed
description Sixteen countries, including Bangladesh, have reported the presence of tilapia lake virus (TiLV), an emerging tilapia pathogen. Fish polyculture is a common farming practice in Bangladesh. Some unusual mortalities reported in species co‐cultivated with TiLV‐infected tilapia led us to investigate whether any of the co‐cultivated species would also test positive for TiLV and whether they were susceptible to TiLV infection under controlled laboratory experiments. Using 183 samples obtained from 15 farms in six districts across Bangladesh, we determined that 20% of the farms tested positive for TiLV in tilapia, while 15 co‐cultivated fish species and seven other invertebrates (e.g. insects and crustaceans) considered potential carriers all tested negative. Of the six representative fish species experimentally infected with TiLV, only Nile tilapia showed the typical clinical signs of the disease, with 70% mortality within 12 days. By contrast, four carp species and one catfish species challenged with TiLV showed no signs of TiLV infection. Challenged tilapia were confirmed as TiLV‐positive by RT‐qPCR, while challenged carp and walking catfish all tested negative. Overall, our field and laboratory findings indicate that species used in polycultures are not susceptible to TiLV. Although current evidence suggests that TiLV is likely host‐specific to tilapia, targeted surveillance for TiLV in other fish species in polyculture systems should continue, in order to prepare for a possible future scenario where TiLV mutates and/or adapts to new host(s).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9293328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92933282022-07-20 Tilapia Lake Virus was not detected in non‐tilapine species within tilapia polyculture systems of Bangladesh Debnath, Partho Pratim Dinh‐Hung, Nguyen Taengphu, Suwimon Nguyen, Vuong Viet Delamare‐Deboutteville, Jerome Senapin, Saengchan Vishnumurthy Mohan, Chadag Dong, Ha Thanh Rodkhum, Channarong J Fish Dis Research Articles Sixteen countries, including Bangladesh, have reported the presence of tilapia lake virus (TiLV), an emerging tilapia pathogen. Fish polyculture is a common farming practice in Bangladesh. Some unusual mortalities reported in species co‐cultivated with TiLV‐infected tilapia led us to investigate whether any of the co‐cultivated species would also test positive for TiLV and whether they were susceptible to TiLV infection under controlled laboratory experiments. Using 183 samples obtained from 15 farms in six districts across Bangladesh, we determined that 20% of the farms tested positive for TiLV in tilapia, while 15 co‐cultivated fish species and seven other invertebrates (e.g. insects and crustaceans) considered potential carriers all tested negative. Of the six representative fish species experimentally infected with TiLV, only Nile tilapia showed the typical clinical signs of the disease, with 70% mortality within 12 days. By contrast, four carp species and one catfish species challenged with TiLV showed no signs of TiLV infection. Challenged tilapia were confirmed as TiLV‐positive by RT‐qPCR, while challenged carp and walking catfish all tested negative. Overall, our field and laboratory findings indicate that species used in polycultures are not susceptible to TiLV. Although current evidence suggests that TiLV is likely host‐specific to tilapia, targeted surveillance for TiLV in other fish species in polyculture systems should continue, in order to prepare for a possible future scenario where TiLV mutates and/or adapts to new host(s). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-27 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9293328/ /pubmed/34580880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13537 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Fish Diseases published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Debnath, Partho Pratim
Dinh‐Hung, Nguyen
Taengphu, Suwimon
Nguyen, Vuong Viet
Delamare‐Deboutteville, Jerome
Senapin, Saengchan
Vishnumurthy Mohan, Chadag
Dong, Ha Thanh
Rodkhum, Channarong
Tilapia Lake Virus was not detected in non‐tilapine species within tilapia polyculture systems of Bangladesh
title Tilapia Lake Virus was not detected in non‐tilapine species within tilapia polyculture systems of Bangladesh
title_full Tilapia Lake Virus was not detected in non‐tilapine species within tilapia polyculture systems of Bangladesh
title_fullStr Tilapia Lake Virus was not detected in non‐tilapine species within tilapia polyculture systems of Bangladesh
title_full_unstemmed Tilapia Lake Virus was not detected in non‐tilapine species within tilapia polyculture systems of Bangladesh
title_short Tilapia Lake Virus was not detected in non‐tilapine species within tilapia polyculture systems of Bangladesh
title_sort tilapia lake virus was not detected in non‐tilapine species within tilapia polyculture systems of bangladesh
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfd.13537
work_keys_str_mv AT debnathparthopratim tilapialakeviruswasnotdetectedinnontilapinespecieswithintilapiapolyculturesystemsofbangladesh
AT dinhhungnguyen tilapialakeviruswasnotdetectedinnontilapinespecieswithintilapiapolyculturesystemsofbangladesh
AT taengphusuwimon tilapialakeviruswasnotdetectedinnontilapinespecieswithintilapiapolyculturesystemsofbangladesh
AT nguyenvuongviet tilapialakeviruswasnotdetectedinnontilapinespecieswithintilapiapolyculturesystemsofbangladesh
AT delamaredebouttevillejerome tilapialakeviruswasnotdetectedinnontilapinespecieswithintilapiapolyculturesystemsofbangladesh
AT senapinsaengchan tilapialakeviruswasnotdetectedinnontilapinespecieswithintilapiapolyculturesystemsofbangladesh
AT vishnumurthymohanchadag tilapialakeviruswasnotdetectedinnontilapinespecieswithintilapiapolyculturesystemsofbangladesh
AT donghathanh tilapialakeviruswasnotdetectedinnontilapinespecieswithintilapiapolyculturesystemsofbangladesh
AT rodkhumchannarong tilapialakeviruswasnotdetectedinnontilapinespecieswithintilapiapolyculturesystemsofbangladesh