Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the PIONEER 1, 3, 4 and 8 trials

AIMS: To evaluate, through exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses, the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide versus comparators in Japanese patients enrolled in the global PIONEER 1, 3, 4 and 8 clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to once‐daily oral semaglutide 3, 7 or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Araki, Eiichi, Terauchi, Yasuo, Watada, Hirotaka, Deenadayalan, Srikanth, Christiansen, Erik, Horio, Hiroshi, Kadowaki, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34472698
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14536
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: To evaluate, through exploratory post hoc subgroup analyses, the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide versus comparators in Japanese patients enrolled in the global PIONEER 1, 3, 4 and 8 clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to once‐daily oral semaglutide 3, 7 or 14 mg or comparator (placebo, sitagliptin 100 mg or liraglutide 1.8 mg). Change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight, and proportions of patients attaining HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and body weight loss ≥5%, were analysed at week 26 for all Japanese patients in each trial separately using the treatment policy estimand (regardless of treatment discontinuation or rescue medication use). Adverse events (AEs) were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: Reductions in HbA1c from baseline in Japanese patients were 1.0% to 1.2% (11.3 mmol/mol to 13.3 mmol/mol) and 1.4% to 1.7% (15.7 mmol/mol to 18.3 mmol/mol) for oral semaglutide 7 mg and 14 mg, respectively. HbA1c reductions were similar or greater than with comparators. Body weight reductions were 1.0% to 2.7% and 3.7% to 4.7% for oral semaglutide 7 mg and 14 mg, respectively, and were generally greater with oral semaglutide than comparators. As expected, the main class of AEs was gastrointestinal, and these AEs comprised most commonly mild‐to‐moderate constipation, nausea and diarrhoea. CONCLUSIONS: Oral semaglutide appears efficacious and well tolerated in Japanese patients across the type 2 diabetes spectrum.