Cargando…

Postprandial renal haemodynamic effects of the dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor linagliptin versus the sulphonylurea glimepiride in adults with type 2 diabetes (RENALIS): A predefined substudy of a randomized, double‐blind trial

AIM: To determine the effect of the dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor linagliptin on postprandial glomerular hyperfiltration compared with the sulphonylurea glimepiride in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this predefined substudy within a randomized, double‐blind, parallel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muskiet, Marcel H. A., Tonneijck, Lennart, Smits, Mark M., Kramer, Mark H. H., Ouwens, D. Margriet, Hartmann, Bolette, Holst, Jens J., Danser, A. H. Jan, Joles, Jaap A., van Raalte, Daniël H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34580975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14557
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To determine the effect of the dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor linagliptin on postprandial glomerular hyperfiltration compared with the sulphonylurea glimepiride in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this predefined substudy within a randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, intervention trial, overweight people with T2D without renal impairment were treated with once‐daily linagliptin 5 mg (N = 10) or glimepiride 1 mg (N = 13) as an add‐on to metformin for 8 weeks. After a standardized liquid protein‐rich meal, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and effective renal plasma flow were determined by inulin and para‐aminohippuric acid clearance, respectively, based on timed urine sampling. Intrarenal haemodynamics were estimated using the Gomez equations. Glucoregulatory/vasoactive hormones, urinary pH and fractional excretions (FE) of sodium, potassium and urea were measured. RESULTS: Compared with glimepiride, linagliptin increased the postprandial filtration fraction (FF; mean difference 2.1%‐point; P = .016) and estimated glomerular hydraulic pressure (mean difference 3.0 mmHg; P = .050), and tended to increase GFR (P = .08) and estimated efferent renal arteriolar resistance (R(E); P = .08) from baseline to week 8. No differences in FE were noted. Glimepiride reduced HbA1c more than linagliptin (mean difference −0.40%; P = .004), without between‐group differences in time‐averaged postprandial glucose levels. In the linagliptin group, change in FF correlated with change in mean arterial pressure (R = 0.807; P = .009) and time‐averaged mean glucagon (R = 0.782; P = .008), but not with changes in glucose, insulin, intact glucagon‐like peptide‐1, renin or FE(Na). Change in glucagon was associated with change in R(E) (R = 0.830; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to our hypothesis, compared with glimepiride, linagliptin does not reduce postprandial hyperfiltration, yet appears to increase FF after meal ingestion by increasing blood pressure or R(E).