Cargando…

Human versus Artificial Intelligence–Based Echocardiographic Analysis as a Predictor of Outcomes: An Analysis from the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography COVID Study

BACKGROUND: Transthoracic echocardiography is the leading cardiac imaging modality for patients admitted with COVID-19, a condition of high short-term mortality. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that artificial intelligence (AI)–based analysis of echocardiographic images could predic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asch, Federico M., Descamps, Tine, Sarwar, Rizwan, Karagodin, Ilya, Singulane, Cristiane Carvalho, Xie, Mingxing, Tucay, Edwin S., Tude Rodrigues, Ana C., Vasquez-Ortiz, Zuilma Y., Monaghan, Mark J., Ordonez Salazar, Bayardo A., Soulat-Dufour, Laurie, Alizadehasl, Azin, Mostafavi, Atoosa, Moreo, Antonella, Citro, Rodolfo, Narang, Akhil, Wu, Chun, Addetia, Karima, Upton, Ross, Woodward, Gary M., Lang, Roberto M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mosby-Year Book 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35863542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2022.07.004
_version_ 1784749615076081664
author Asch, Federico M.
Descamps, Tine
Sarwar, Rizwan
Karagodin, Ilya
Singulane, Cristiane Carvalho
Xie, Mingxing
Tucay, Edwin S.
Tude Rodrigues, Ana C.
Vasquez-Ortiz, Zuilma Y.
Monaghan, Mark J.
Ordonez Salazar, Bayardo A.
Soulat-Dufour, Laurie
Alizadehasl, Azin
Mostafavi, Atoosa
Moreo, Antonella
Citro, Rodolfo
Narang, Akhil
Wu, Chun
Addetia, Karima
Upton, Ross
Woodward, Gary M.
Lang, Roberto M.
author_facet Asch, Federico M.
Descamps, Tine
Sarwar, Rizwan
Karagodin, Ilya
Singulane, Cristiane Carvalho
Xie, Mingxing
Tucay, Edwin S.
Tude Rodrigues, Ana C.
Vasquez-Ortiz, Zuilma Y.
Monaghan, Mark J.
Ordonez Salazar, Bayardo A.
Soulat-Dufour, Laurie
Alizadehasl, Azin
Mostafavi, Atoosa
Moreo, Antonella
Citro, Rodolfo
Narang, Akhil
Wu, Chun
Addetia, Karima
Upton, Ross
Woodward, Gary M.
Lang, Roberto M.
author_sort Asch, Federico M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transthoracic echocardiography is the leading cardiac imaging modality for patients admitted with COVID-19, a condition of high short-term mortality. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that artificial intelligence (AI)–based analysis of echocardiographic images could predict mortality more accurately than conventional analysis by a human expert. METHODS: Patients admitted to 13 hospitals for acute COVID-19 who underwent transthoracic echocardiography were included. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular longitudinal strain (LVLS) were obtained manually by multiple expert readers and by automated AI software. The ability of the manual and AI analyses to predict all-cause mortality was compared. RESULTS: In total, 870 patients were enrolled. The mortality rate was 27.4% after a mean follow-up period of 230 ± 115 days. AI analysis had lower variability than manual analysis for both LVEF (P = .003) and LVLS (P = .005). AI-derived LVEF and LVLS were predictors of mortality in univariable and multivariable regression analysis (odds ratio, 0.974 [95% CI, 0.956-0.991; P = .003] for LVEF; odds ratio, 1.060 [95% CI, 1.019-1.105; P = .004] for LVLS), but LVEF and LVLS obtained by manual analysis were not. Direct comparison of the predictive value of AI versus manual measurements of LVEF and LVLS showed that AI was significantly better (P = .005 and P = .003, respectively). In addition, AI-derived LVEF and LVLS had more significant and stronger correlations to other objective biomarkers of acute disease than manual reads. CONCLUSIONS: AI-based analysis of LVEF and LVLS had similar feasibility as manual analysis, minimized variability, and consequently increased the statistical power to predict mortality. AI-based, but not manual, analyses were a significant predictor of in-hospital and follow-up mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9293371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mosby-Year Book
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92933712022-07-19 Human versus Artificial Intelligence–Based Echocardiographic Analysis as a Predictor of Outcomes: An Analysis from the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography COVID Study Asch, Federico M. Descamps, Tine Sarwar, Rizwan Karagodin, Ilya Singulane, Cristiane Carvalho Xie, Mingxing Tucay, Edwin S. Tude Rodrigues, Ana C. Vasquez-Ortiz, Zuilma Y. Monaghan, Mark J. Ordonez Salazar, Bayardo A. Soulat-Dufour, Laurie Alizadehasl, Azin Mostafavi, Atoosa Moreo, Antonella Citro, Rodolfo Narang, Akhil Wu, Chun Addetia, Karima Upton, Ross Woodward, Gary M. Lang, Roberto M. J Am Soc Echocardiogr Focus Topic: Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography BACKGROUND: Transthoracic echocardiography is the leading cardiac imaging modality for patients admitted with COVID-19, a condition of high short-term mortality. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that artificial intelligence (AI)–based analysis of echocardiographic images could predict mortality more accurately than conventional analysis by a human expert. METHODS: Patients admitted to 13 hospitals for acute COVID-19 who underwent transthoracic echocardiography were included. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular longitudinal strain (LVLS) were obtained manually by multiple expert readers and by automated AI software. The ability of the manual and AI analyses to predict all-cause mortality was compared. RESULTS: In total, 870 patients were enrolled. The mortality rate was 27.4% after a mean follow-up period of 230 ± 115 days. AI analysis had lower variability than manual analysis for both LVEF (P = .003) and LVLS (P = .005). AI-derived LVEF and LVLS were predictors of mortality in univariable and multivariable regression analysis (odds ratio, 0.974 [95% CI, 0.956-0.991; P = .003] for LVEF; odds ratio, 1.060 [95% CI, 1.019-1.105; P = .004] for LVLS), but LVEF and LVLS obtained by manual analysis were not. Direct comparison of the predictive value of AI versus manual measurements of LVEF and LVLS showed that AI was significantly better (P = .005 and P = .003, respectively). In addition, AI-derived LVEF and LVLS had more significant and stronger correlations to other objective biomarkers of acute disease than manual reads. CONCLUSIONS: AI-based analysis of LVEF and LVLS had similar feasibility as manual analysis, minimized variability, and consequently increased the statistical power to predict mortality. AI-based, but not manual, analyses were a significant predictor of in-hospital and follow-up mortality. Mosby-Year Book 2022-12 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9293371/ /pubmed/35863542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2022.07.004 Text en 2022 by the American Society of Echocardiography. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Focus Topic: Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography
Asch, Federico M.
Descamps, Tine
Sarwar, Rizwan
Karagodin, Ilya
Singulane, Cristiane Carvalho
Xie, Mingxing
Tucay, Edwin S.
Tude Rodrigues, Ana C.
Vasquez-Ortiz, Zuilma Y.
Monaghan, Mark J.
Ordonez Salazar, Bayardo A.
Soulat-Dufour, Laurie
Alizadehasl, Azin
Mostafavi, Atoosa
Moreo, Antonella
Citro, Rodolfo
Narang, Akhil
Wu, Chun
Addetia, Karima
Upton, Ross
Woodward, Gary M.
Lang, Roberto M.
Human versus Artificial Intelligence–Based Echocardiographic Analysis as a Predictor of Outcomes: An Analysis from the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography COVID Study
title Human versus Artificial Intelligence–Based Echocardiographic Analysis as a Predictor of Outcomes: An Analysis from the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography COVID Study
title_full Human versus Artificial Intelligence–Based Echocardiographic Analysis as a Predictor of Outcomes: An Analysis from the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography COVID Study
title_fullStr Human versus Artificial Intelligence–Based Echocardiographic Analysis as a Predictor of Outcomes: An Analysis from the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography COVID Study
title_full_unstemmed Human versus Artificial Intelligence–Based Echocardiographic Analysis as a Predictor of Outcomes: An Analysis from the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography COVID Study
title_short Human versus Artificial Intelligence–Based Echocardiographic Analysis as a Predictor of Outcomes: An Analysis from the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography COVID Study
title_sort human versus artificial intelligence–based echocardiographic analysis as a predictor of outcomes: an analysis from the world alliance societies of echocardiography covid study
topic Focus Topic: Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35863542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2022.07.004
work_keys_str_mv AT aschfedericom humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT descampstine humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT sarwarrizwan humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT karagodinilya humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT singulanecristianecarvalho humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT xiemingxing humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT tucayedwins humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT tuderodriguesanac humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT vasquezortizzuilmay humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT monaghanmarkj humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT ordonezsalazarbayardoa humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT soulatdufourlaurie humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT alizadehaslazin humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT mostafaviatoosa humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT moreoantonella humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT citrorodolfo humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT narangakhil humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT wuchun humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT addetiakarima humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT uptonross humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT woodwardgarym humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT langrobertom humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy
AT humanversusartificialintelligencebasedechocardiographicanalysisasapredictorofoutcomesananalysisfromtheworldalliancesocietiesofechocardiographycovidstudy