Cargando…

Class II Correction with Microimplant Supported Molar Distalization: A Report of Two Cases

INTRODUCTION: Orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion with conventional treatment modalities can be challenging for the clinician. The use of microimplants to obtain absolute anchorage has become very popular in recent years especially in noncompliant patients. Microimplants are convenient, s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skaf, Zouhair, Nabbout, Fidèle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2679318
_version_ 1784749661754490880
author Skaf, Zouhair
Nabbout, Fidèle
author_facet Skaf, Zouhair
Nabbout, Fidèle
author_sort Skaf, Zouhair
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion with conventional treatment modalities can be challenging for the clinician. The use of microimplants to obtain absolute anchorage has become very popular in recent years especially in noncompliant patients. Microimplants are convenient, save time, and produce good treatment results with no need for patient cooperation. A special approach for class II correction with microimplant supported molar distalization has been developed by the authors and is illustrated through two clinical cases. Description. For each clinical case, 0.022” preadjusted brackets were bonded on both arches except on the maxillary first and second premolars with bands on the first and second molars. After leveling and alignment, a 0.017(”) × 0.025(”) stainless steel wire was fitted on the upper arch, and two microimplants were placed bilaterally between the maxillary second premolar and the first molar. Open coil springs were inserted in the upper archwire on both sides and compressed via a steel ligature on sliding hooks to the microimplants pushing distally simultaneously the first and second maxillary molars. En-masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth was then carried out on a 0.019(”) × 0.025(”) stainless steel closing loop archwire while the posterior segment was anchored to the microimplant with a steel ligature to the first premolar. RESULTS: Class I canine and molar relationship were achieved, and an ideal occlusion was established. Both ANB and FMA angles decreased by 1° due to the counterclockwise rotation effect of the maxillomandibular complex. Skeletal and dental results remained stable three years later. CONCLUSION: Maxillary molar distalization using coils and buccal microimplants can be regarded as an effective technique in a relatively short time and might be considered a breakthrough in the treatment of class II malocclusions. Microimplants enable the clinician to perform a nonextraction treatment in noncompliant patients who would alternatively be treated only with extractions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9293559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92935592022-07-19 Class II Correction with Microimplant Supported Molar Distalization: A Report of Two Cases Skaf, Zouhair Nabbout, Fidèle Case Rep Dent Case Report INTRODUCTION: Orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion with conventional treatment modalities can be challenging for the clinician. The use of microimplants to obtain absolute anchorage has become very popular in recent years especially in noncompliant patients. Microimplants are convenient, save time, and produce good treatment results with no need for patient cooperation. A special approach for class II correction with microimplant supported molar distalization has been developed by the authors and is illustrated through two clinical cases. Description. For each clinical case, 0.022” preadjusted brackets were bonded on both arches except on the maxillary first and second premolars with bands on the first and second molars. After leveling and alignment, a 0.017(”) × 0.025(”) stainless steel wire was fitted on the upper arch, and two microimplants were placed bilaterally between the maxillary second premolar and the first molar. Open coil springs were inserted in the upper archwire on both sides and compressed via a steel ligature on sliding hooks to the microimplants pushing distally simultaneously the first and second maxillary molars. En-masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth was then carried out on a 0.019(”) × 0.025(”) stainless steel closing loop archwire while the posterior segment was anchored to the microimplant with a steel ligature to the first premolar. RESULTS: Class I canine and molar relationship were achieved, and an ideal occlusion was established. Both ANB and FMA angles decreased by 1° due to the counterclockwise rotation effect of the maxillomandibular complex. Skeletal and dental results remained stable three years later. CONCLUSION: Maxillary molar distalization using coils and buccal microimplants can be regarded as an effective technique in a relatively short time and might be considered a breakthrough in the treatment of class II malocclusions. Microimplants enable the clinician to perform a nonextraction treatment in noncompliant patients who would alternatively be treated only with extractions. Hindawi 2022-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9293559/ /pubmed/35860214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2679318 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zouhair Skaf and Fidèle Nabbout. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Skaf, Zouhair
Nabbout, Fidèle
Class II Correction with Microimplant Supported Molar Distalization: A Report of Two Cases
title Class II Correction with Microimplant Supported Molar Distalization: A Report of Two Cases
title_full Class II Correction with Microimplant Supported Molar Distalization: A Report of Two Cases
title_fullStr Class II Correction with Microimplant Supported Molar Distalization: A Report of Two Cases
title_full_unstemmed Class II Correction with Microimplant Supported Molar Distalization: A Report of Two Cases
title_short Class II Correction with Microimplant Supported Molar Distalization: A Report of Two Cases
title_sort class ii correction with microimplant supported molar distalization: a report of two cases
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35860214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2679318
work_keys_str_mv AT skafzouhair classiicorrectionwithmicroimplantsupportedmolardistalizationareportoftwocases
AT nabboutfidele classiicorrectionwithmicroimplantsupportedmolardistalizationareportoftwocases