Cargando…

Breathing variability during propofol/remifentanil procedural sedation with a single additional dose of midazolam or s-ketamine: a prospective observational study

PURPOSE: Regulation of spontaneous breathing is highly complex and may be influenced by drugs administered during the perioperative period. Because of their different pharmacological properties we hypothesized that midazolam and s-ketamine exert different effects on the variability of minute ventila...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Bosch, O. F. C., Alvarez-Jimenez, R., Schet, S. G., Delfsma, K., Loer, S. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34767130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00773-2
_version_ 1784749714247254016
author van den Bosch, O. F. C.
Alvarez-Jimenez, R.
Schet, S. G.
Delfsma, K.
Loer, S. A.
author_facet van den Bosch, O. F. C.
Alvarez-Jimenez, R.
Schet, S. G.
Delfsma, K.
Loer, S. A.
author_sort van den Bosch, O. F. C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Regulation of spontaneous breathing is highly complex and may be influenced by drugs administered during the perioperative period. Because of their different pharmacological properties we hypothesized that midazolam and s-ketamine exert different effects on the variability of minute ventilation (MV), tidal volume (TV) and respiratory rate (RR). METHODS: Patients undergoing procedural sedation (PSA) with propofol and remifentanil received a single dose of midazolam (1–3 mg, n = 10) or s-ketamine (10–25 mg, n = 10). We used non-invasive impedance-based respiratory volume monitoring to record RR as well as changes in TV and MV. Variability of these three parameters was calculated as coefficients of variation. RESULTS: TV and MV decreased during PSA to a comparable extent in both groups, whereas there was no significant change in RR. In line with our hypothesis we observed marked differences in breathing variability. The variability of MV (– 47.5% ± 24.8%, p = 0.011), TV (– 42.1% ± 30.2%, p = 0.003), and RR (– 28.5% ± 29.3%, p = 0.011) was significantly reduced in patients receiving midazolam. In contrast, variability remained unchanged in patients receiving s-ketamine (MV + 16% ± 45.2%, p = 0.182; TV +12% ± 47.7%, p = 0.390; RR +39% ± 65.2%, p = 0.129). After termination of PSA breathing variables returned to baseline values. CONCLUSIONS: While midazolam reduces respiratory variability in spontaneously breathing patients undergoing procedural sedation, s-ketamine preserves variability suggesting different effects on the regulation of spontaneous breathing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9293797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92937972022-07-20 Breathing variability during propofol/remifentanil procedural sedation with a single additional dose of midazolam or s-ketamine: a prospective observational study van den Bosch, O. F. C. Alvarez-Jimenez, R. Schet, S. G. Delfsma, K. Loer, S. A. J Clin Monit Comput Brief Report PURPOSE: Regulation of spontaneous breathing is highly complex and may be influenced by drugs administered during the perioperative period. Because of their different pharmacological properties we hypothesized that midazolam and s-ketamine exert different effects on the variability of minute ventilation (MV), tidal volume (TV) and respiratory rate (RR). METHODS: Patients undergoing procedural sedation (PSA) with propofol and remifentanil received a single dose of midazolam (1–3 mg, n = 10) or s-ketamine (10–25 mg, n = 10). We used non-invasive impedance-based respiratory volume monitoring to record RR as well as changes in TV and MV. Variability of these three parameters was calculated as coefficients of variation. RESULTS: TV and MV decreased during PSA to a comparable extent in both groups, whereas there was no significant change in RR. In line with our hypothesis we observed marked differences in breathing variability. The variability of MV (– 47.5% ± 24.8%, p = 0.011), TV (– 42.1% ± 30.2%, p = 0.003), and RR (– 28.5% ± 29.3%, p = 0.011) was significantly reduced in patients receiving midazolam. In contrast, variability remained unchanged in patients receiving s-ketamine (MV + 16% ± 45.2%, p = 0.182; TV +12% ± 47.7%, p = 0.390; RR +39% ± 65.2%, p = 0.129). After termination of PSA breathing variables returned to baseline values. CONCLUSIONS: While midazolam reduces respiratory variability in spontaneously breathing patients undergoing procedural sedation, s-ketamine preserves variability suggesting different effects on the regulation of spontaneous breathing. Springer Netherlands 2021-11-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9293797/ /pubmed/34767130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00773-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Brief Report
van den Bosch, O. F. C.
Alvarez-Jimenez, R.
Schet, S. G.
Delfsma, K.
Loer, S. A.
Breathing variability during propofol/remifentanil procedural sedation with a single additional dose of midazolam or s-ketamine: a prospective observational study
title Breathing variability during propofol/remifentanil procedural sedation with a single additional dose of midazolam or s-ketamine: a prospective observational study
title_full Breathing variability during propofol/remifentanil procedural sedation with a single additional dose of midazolam or s-ketamine: a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Breathing variability during propofol/remifentanil procedural sedation with a single additional dose of midazolam or s-ketamine: a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Breathing variability during propofol/remifentanil procedural sedation with a single additional dose of midazolam or s-ketamine: a prospective observational study
title_short Breathing variability during propofol/remifentanil procedural sedation with a single additional dose of midazolam or s-ketamine: a prospective observational study
title_sort breathing variability during propofol/remifentanil procedural sedation with a single additional dose of midazolam or s-ketamine: a prospective observational study
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34767130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-021-00773-2
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenboschofc breathingvariabilityduringpropofolremifentanilproceduralsedationwithasingleadditionaldoseofmidazolamorsketamineaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT alvarezjimenezr breathingvariabilityduringpropofolremifentanilproceduralsedationwithasingleadditionaldoseofmidazolamorsketamineaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT schetsg breathingvariabilityduringpropofolremifentanilproceduralsedationwithasingleadditionaldoseofmidazolamorsketamineaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT delfsmak breathingvariabilityduringpropofolremifentanilproceduralsedationwithasingleadditionaldoseofmidazolamorsketamineaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT loersa breathingvariabilityduringpropofolremifentanilproceduralsedationwithasingleadditionaldoseofmidazolamorsketamineaprospectiveobservationalstudy