Cargando…
Radiotherapy for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status
PURPOSE: There is limited information on treatment recommendations for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status. Here, we aim to evaluate the association of radiotherapy on survival in glioblastoma patients presenting with poor postoperative performance status in first-line setting. METHOD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03770-9 |
_version_ | 1784749728296075264 |
---|---|
author | Schröder, Christina Gramatzki, Dorothee Vu, Erwin Guckenberger, Matthias Andratschke, Nicolaus Weller, Michael Hertler, Caroline |
author_facet | Schröder, Christina Gramatzki, Dorothee Vu, Erwin Guckenberger, Matthias Andratschke, Nicolaus Weller, Michael Hertler, Caroline |
author_sort | Schröder, Christina |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: There is limited information on treatment recommendations for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status. Here, we aim to evaluate the association of radiotherapy on survival in glioblastoma patients presenting with poor postoperative performance status in first-line setting. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of 93 glioblastoma patients presenting with poor postoperative performance status (ECOG 2–4) at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, in the years 2005–2019. A total of 43 patients received radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy in the first-line setting, whereas 50 patients received no additive local or systemic treatment after initial biopsy or resection. Overall survival was calculated from primary diagnosis and from the end of radiotherapy. In addition, factors influencing survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Median overall survival from primary diagnosis was 6.2 months in the radiotherapy group (95% CI 6.2–14.8 weeks, range 2–149 weeks) and 2.3 months in the group without additive treatment (95% CI 1.3–7.4 weeks, range 0–28 weeks) (p < 0.001). This survival benefit was confirmed by landmark analyses. Factors associated with overall survival were extent of resection and administration of radiotherapy with or without systemic treatment. Median survival from end of radiotherapy was 3 months (95% CI 4.3–21.7 weeks, range 0–72 weeks), with 25.6% (n = 11) early termination of treatment and 83.7% (n = 36) requiring radiotherapy as in-patients. Performance status improved in 27.9% (n = 12) of patients after radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective single-institution analysis, radiotherapy improved overall survival in patients with poor performance status, especially in patients who were amendable to neurosurgical resection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03770-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9293860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92938602022-07-20 Radiotherapy for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status Schröder, Christina Gramatzki, Dorothee Vu, Erwin Guckenberger, Matthias Andratschke, Nicolaus Weller, Michael Hertler, Caroline J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: There is limited information on treatment recommendations for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status. Here, we aim to evaluate the association of radiotherapy on survival in glioblastoma patients presenting with poor postoperative performance status in first-line setting. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of 93 glioblastoma patients presenting with poor postoperative performance status (ECOG 2–4) at the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, in the years 2005–2019. A total of 43 patients received radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy in the first-line setting, whereas 50 patients received no additive local or systemic treatment after initial biopsy or resection. Overall survival was calculated from primary diagnosis and from the end of radiotherapy. In addition, factors influencing survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Median overall survival from primary diagnosis was 6.2 months in the radiotherapy group (95% CI 6.2–14.8 weeks, range 2–149 weeks) and 2.3 months in the group without additive treatment (95% CI 1.3–7.4 weeks, range 0–28 weeks) (p < 0.001). This survival benefit was confirmed by landmark analyses. Factors associated with overall survival were extent of resection and administration of radiotherapy with or without systemic treatment. Median survival from end of radiotherapy was 3 months (95% CI 4.3–21.7 weeks, range 0–72 weeks), with 25.6% (n = 11) early termination of treatment and 83.7% (n = 36) requiring radiotherapy as in-patients. Performance status improved in 27.9% (n = 12) of patients after radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective single-institution analysis, radiotherapy improved overall survival in patients with poor performance status, especially in patients who were amendable to neurosurgical resection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03770-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9293860/ /pubmed/34448057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03770-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article – Clinical Oncology Schröder, Christina Gramatzki, Dorothee Vu, Erwin Guckenberger, Matthias Andratschke, Nicolaus Weller, Michael Hertler, Caroline Radiotherapy for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status |
title | Radiotherapy for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status |
title_full | Radiotherapy for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status |
title_fullStr | Radiotherapy for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiotherapy for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status |
title_short | Radiotherapy for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status |
title_sort | radiotherapy for glioblastoma patients with poor performance status |
topic | Original Article – Clinical Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34448057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03770-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schroderchristina radiotherapyforglioblastomapatientswithpoorperformancestatus AT gramatzkidorothee radiotherapyforglioblastomapatientswithpoorperformancestatus AT vuerwin radiotherapyforglioblastomapatientswithpoorperformancestatus AT guckenbergermatthias radiotherapyforglioblastomapatientswithpoorperformancestatus AT andratschkenicolaus radiotherapyforglioblastomapatientswithpoorperformancestatus AT wellermichael radiotherapyforglioblastomapatientswithpoorperformancestatus AT hertlercaroline radiotherapyforglioblastomapatientswithpoorperformancestatus |