Cargando…

Low intensity stimulation of aortic baroreceptor afferent fibers as a potential therapeutic alternative for hypertension treatment

Carotid baroreceptor stimulation has been clinically explored for antihypertensive benefits, but neuromodulation of aortic baroreceptor afferents remains unexplored for potential translation into the clinic. Published studies have used supramaximal stimulations, which are unphysiological and energy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salman, Ibrahim M., Ameer, Omar Z., McMurray, Sheridan, Hassan, Sarah F., Sridhar, Arun, Lewis, Stephen J., Hsieh, Yee-Hsee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15761-y
_version_ 1784749743804514304
author Salman, Ibrahim M.
Ameer, Omar Z.
McMurray, Sheridan
Hassan, Sarah F.
Sridhar, Arun
Lewis, Stephen J.
Hsieh, Yee-Hsee
author_facet Salman, Ibrahim M.
Ameer, Omar Z.
McMurray, Sheridan
Hassan, Sarah F.
Sridhar, Arun
Lewis, Stephen J.
Hsieh, Yee-Hsee
author_sort Salman, Ibrahim M.
collection PubMed
description Carotid baroreceptor stimulation has been clinically explored for antihypertensive benefits, but neuromodulation of aortic baroreceptor afferents remains unexplored for potential translation into the clinic. Published studies have used supramaximal stimulations, which are unphysiological and energy inefficient. The objective of the present study was to identify optimal low-charge nerve stimulation parameters that would provide a clinically-relevant (20–30 mmHg) decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) in anesthetized spontaneously hypertensive rats. Stimulations of 20 s were delivered to the left aortic depressor nerve (ADN) of these rats using low ranges of pulse amplitudes (≤ 0.6 mA), widths (≤ 0.5 ms) and frequencies (≤ 5 Hz). We also assessed the effects of continuous (20 s) versus intermittent (5 s ON/3 s OFF and 5 s ON/3 s OFF for 20 s) stimulation on MAP, heart rate (HR), mesenteric (MVR) and femoral (FVR) vascular resistance using low (5 Hz) and high (15 Hz) frequencies. Lower pulse amplitudes (0.2 mA) produced 9 ± 2 to 18 ± 2 mmHg decreases in MAP. Higher pulse amplitudes (0.4 mA) produced a median MAP reduction of 28 ± 4 mmHg at 0.2 ms and 5 Hz, with no added benefit seen above 0.4 mA. Continuous and intermittent low frequency stimulation at 0.4 mA and 0.2 ms produced similar sustained decreases in MAP, HR, MVR and FVR. Continuous high frequency stimulation at 0.4 mA and 0.2 ms produced larger reductions in MAP, HR, MVR and FVR compared with all low frequency and/or intermittent high frequency stimulations. We conclude from these findings that “low intensity intermittent” electrical stimulation is an effective alternate way for neuromodulation of the aortic baroreceptor afferents and to evoke a required restoration of MAP levels in spontaneously hypertensive rats. This approach enables low energy consumption and markedly lowers the excessive decreases in MAP and hemodynamic disturbances elicited by continuous high-charge injection protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9293925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92939252022-07-20 Low intensity stimulation of aortic baroreceptor afferent fibers as a potential therapeutic alternative for hypertension treatment Salman, Ibrahim M. Ameer, Omar Z. McMurray, Sheridan Hassan, Sarah F. Sridhar, Arun Lewis, Stephen J. Hsieh, Yee-Hsee Sci Rep Article Carotid baroreceptor stimulation has been clinically explored for antihypertensive benefits, but neuromodulation of aortic baroreceptor afferents remains unexplored for potential translation into the clinic. Published studies have used supramaximal stimulations, which are unphysiological and energy inefficient. The objective of the present study was to identify optimal low-charge nerve stimulation parameters that would provide a clinically-relevant (20–30 mmHg) decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP) in anesthetized spontaneously hypertensive rats. Stimulations of 20 s were delivered to the left aortic depressor nerve (ADN) of these rats using low ranges of pulse amplitudes (≤ 0.6 mA), widths (≤ 0.5 ms) and frequencies (≤ 5 Hz). We also assessed the effects of continuous (20 s) versus intermittent (5 s ON/3 s OFF and 5 s ON/3 s OFF for 20 s) stimulation on MAP, heart rate (HR), mesenteric (MVR) and femoral (FVR) vascular resistance using low (5 Hz) and high (15 Hz) frequencies. Lower pulse amplitudes (0.2 mA) produced 9 ± 2 to 18 ± 2 mmHg decreases in MAP. Higher pulse amplitudes (0.4 mA) produced a median MAP reduction of 28 ± 4 mmHg at 0.2 ms and 5 Hz, with no added benefit seen above 0.4 mA. Continuous and intermittent low frequency stimulation at 0.4 mA and 0.2 ms produced similar sustained decreases in MAP, HR, MVR and FVR. Continuous high frequency stimulation at 0.4 mA and 0.2 ms produced larger reductions in MAP, HR, MVR and FVR compared with all low frequency and/or intermittent high frequency stimulations. We conclude from these findings that “low intensity intermittent” electrical stimulation is an effective alternate way for neuromodulation of the aortic baroreceptor afferents and to evoke a required restoration of MAP levels in spontaneously hypertensive rats. This approach enables low energy consumption and markedly lowers the excessive decreases in MAP and hemodynamic disturbances elicited by continuous high-charge injection protocols. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9293925/ /pubmed/35851099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15761-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Salman, Ibrahim M.
Ameer, Omar Z.
McMurray, Sheridan
Hassan, Sarah F.
Sridhar, Arun
Lewis, Stephen J.
Hsieh, Yee-Hsee
Low intensity stimulation of aortic baroreceptor afferent fibers as a potential therapeutic alternative for hypertension treatment
title Low intensity stimulation of aortic baroreceptor afferent fibers as a potential therapeutic alternative for hypertension treatment
title_full Low intensity stimulation of aortic baroreceptor afferent fibers as a potential therapeutic alternative for hypertension treatment
title_fullStr Low intensity stimulation of aortic baroreceptor afferent fibers as a potential therapeutic alternative for hypertension treatment
title_full_unstemmed Low intensity stimulation of aortic baroreceptor afferent fibers as a potential therapeutic alternative for hypertension treatment
title_short Low intensity stimulation of aortic baroreceptor afferent fibers as a potential therapeutic alternative for hypertension treatment
title_sort low intensity stimulation of aortic baroreceptor afferent fibers as a potential therapeutic alternative for hypertension treatment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9293925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35851099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15761-y
work_keys_str_mv AT salmanibrahimm lowintensitystimulationofaorticbaroreceptorafferentfibersasapotentialtherapeuticalternativeforhypertensiontreatment
AT ameeromarz lowintensitystimulationofaorticbaroreceptorafferentfibersasapotentialtherapeuticalternativeforhypertensiontreatment
AT mcmurraysheridan lowintensitystimulationofaorticbaroreceptorafferentfibersasapotentialtherapeuticalternativeforhypertensiontreatment
AT hassansarahf lowintensitystimulationofaorticbaroreceptorafferentfibersasapotentialtherapeuticalternativeforhypertensiontreatment
AT sridhararun lowintensitystimulationofaorticbaroreceptorafferentfibersasapotentialtherapeuticalternativeforhypertensiontreatment
AT lewisstephenj lowintensitystimulationofaorticbaroreceptorafferentfibersasapotentialtherapeuticalternativeforhypertensiontreatment
AT hsiehyeehsee lowintensitystimulationofaorticbaroreceptorafferentfibersasapotentialtherapeuticalternativeforhypertensiontreatment