Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilars Compared With Reference Biologics in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background: Bevacizumab biosimilars are slowly making their way into cancer treatment, but the data on their efficacy and safety in cancer patients are still poor. We systematically summarized the current evidence for the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilars in patients with advanced non-s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Xinyi, Zhang, Shengzhao, Xu, Ting, Zhan, Mei, Chen, Chen, Zhang, Chenyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35865968
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.880090
_version_ 1784749834559815680
author Xu, Xinyi
Zhang, Shengzhao
Xu, Ting
Zhan, Mei
Chen, Chen
Zhang, Chenyu
author_facet Xu, Xinyi
Zhang, Shengzhao
Xu, Ting
Zhan, Mei
Chen, Chen
Zhang, Chenyu
author_sort Xu, Xinyi
collection PubMed
description Background: Bevacizumab biosimilars are slowly making their way into cancer treatment, but the data on their efficacy and safety in cancer patients are still poor. We systematically summarized the current evidence for the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilars in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: This review searched CNKI, VIP, PubMed, Medline (Ovid), Embase, and Cochrane Library (Ovid) for randomized controlled trials of bevacizumab biosimilars treated in adults with advanced NSCLC or metastatic CRC. A pairwise meta-analysis and a Bayesian network meta-analysis based on the random-effect model were performed to summarize the evidence. We rated the certainty of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Results: Ten eligible trials with a total of 5526 patients were included. Seven trials (n = 4581) were for the NSCLC population, while three trials (n = 945) were for patients with CRC. According to the pairwise meta-analysis, the efficacy (objective response rate: risk ratio (RR) 0.98 [0.92–1.04], p = 0.45; progression-free survival: hazard ratio (HR) 1.01 [0.92–1.10], p = 0.85; and overall survival: HR 1.06 [0.94–1.19], p = 0.35) and safety (incidence of grade 3–5 adverse events: odds ratio (OR) 1.03 [0.91–1.16], p = 0.65) of bevacizumab biosimilars performed no significant difference with reference biologics in patients with NSCLC as well as metastatic CRC patients (objective response rate: RR 0.97 [0.87–1.09], p = 0.60; overall survival: HR 0.94 [0.70–1.25], p = 0.66; incidence of grade 3–5 adverse events: OR 0.78 [0.59–1.02], p = 0.73). Network estimates displayed 7 types of bevacizumab biosimilars in the medication regime of NSCLC patients who had no significant difference among each other in terms of efficacy and safety. The certainty of the evidence was assessed as low to moderate. Three types of biosimilars were found to be clinically equivalent to each other in the patients with CRC, which were evaluated with very low to moderate certainty. Conclusion: In patients with advanced NSCLC or metastatic CRC, the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilars were found to be comparable with those of reference biologics and each other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9294356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92943562022-07-20 Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilars Compared With Reference Biologics in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis Xu, Xinyi Zhang, Shengzhao Xu, Ting Zhan, Mei Chen, Chen Zhang, Chenyu Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Bevacizumab biosimilars are slowly making their way into cancer treatment, but the data on their efficacy and safety in cancer patients are still poor. We systematically summarized the current evidence for the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilars in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: This review searched CNKI, VIP, PubMed, Medline (Ovid), Embase, and Cochrane Library (Ovid) for randomized controlled trials of bevacizumab biosimilars treated in adults with advanced NSCLC or metastatic CRC. A pairwise meta-analysis and a Bayesian network meta-analysis based on the random-effect model were performed to summarize the evidence. We rated the certainty of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Results: Ten eligible trials with a total of 5526 patients were included. Seven trials (n = 4581) were for the NSCLC population, while three trials (n = 945) were for patients with CRC. According to the pairwise meta-analysis, the efficacy (objective response rate: risk ratio (RR) 0.98 [0.92–1.04], p = 0.45; progression-free survival: hazard ratio (HR) 1.01 [0.92–1.10], p = 0.85; and overall survival: HR 1.06 [0.94–1.19], p = 0.35) and safety (incidence of grade 3–5 adverse events: odds ratio (OR) 1.03 [0.91–1.16], p = 0.65) of bevacizumab biosimilars performed no significant difference with reference biologics in patients with NSCLC as well as metastatic CRC patients (objective response rate: RR 0.97 [0.87–1.09], p = 0.60; overall survival: HR 0.94 [0.70–1.25], p = 0.66; incidence of grade 3–5 adverse events: OR 0.78 [0.59–1.02], p = 0.73). Network estimates displayed 7 types of bevacizumab biosimilars in the medication regime of NSCLC patients who had no significant difference among each other in terms of efficacy and safety. The certainty of the evidence was assessed as low to moderate. Three types of biosimilars were found to be clinically equivalent to each other in the patients with CRC, which were evaluated with very low to moderate certainty. Conclusion: In patients with advanced NSCLC or metastatic CRC, the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilars were found to be comparable with those of reference biologics and each other. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9294356/ /pubmed/35865968 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.880090 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xu, Zhang, Xu, Zhan, Chen and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Xu, Xinyi
Zhang, Shengzhao
Xu, Ting
Zhan, Mei
Chen, Chen
Zhang, Chenyu
Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilars Compared With Reference Biologics in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilars Compared With Reference Biologics in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilars Compared With Reference Biologics in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilars Compared With Reference Biologics in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilars Compared With Reference Biologics in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilars Compared With Reference Biologics in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilars compared with reference biologics in advanced non-small cell lung cancer or metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a network meta-analysis
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35865968
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.880090
work_keys_str_mv AT xuxinyi efficacyandsafetyofbevacizumabbiosimilarscomparedwithreferencebiologicsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerormetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangshengzhao efficacyandsafetyofbevacizumabbiosimilarscomparedwithreferencebiologicsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerormetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT xuting efficacyandsafetyofbevacizumabbiosimilarscomparedwithreferencebiologicsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerormetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhanmei efficacyandsafetyofbevacizumabbiosimilarscomparedwithreferencebiologicsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerormetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenchen efficacyandsafetyofbevacizumabbiosimilarscomparedwithreferencebiologicsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerormetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangchenyu efficacyandsafetyofbevacizumabbiosimilarscomparedwithreferencebiologicsinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerormetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsanetworkmetaanalysis