Cargando…

Comparison of two commercial methods for smooth-shelled mussels (Mytilus spp.) species identification

Seafood international trade has increased the labeling requirements in standards and regulations to include product information that enable traders and consumers to make informed choices. The European Union (EU) Regulation No. 1379/2013 imposes the declaration of an official commercial designation a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asorey, Cynthia M., Jilberto, Felipe, Haase, Ilka, Schubbert, Rainer, Angélica Larraín, María, Araneda, Cristián
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35865713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100121
_version_ 1784749874383683584
author Asorey, Cynthia M.
Jilberto, Felipe
Haase, Ilka
Schubbert, Rainer
Angélica Larraín, María
Araneda, Cristián
author_facet Asorey, Cynthia M.
Jilberto, Felipe
Haase, Ilka
Schubbert, Rainer
Angélica Larraín, María
Araneda, Cristián
author_sort Asorey, Cynthia M.
collection PubMed
description Seafood international trade has increased the labeling requirements in standards and regulations to include product information that enable traders and consumers to make informed choices. The European Union (EU) Regulation No. 1379/2013 imposes the declaration of an official commercial designation and scientific names for all the fishery and aquaculture products to be offered for sale to the final consumers. DNA analyses are used to enforce this regulation and to test authenticity in processed foods. We compared the performance of two mono-locus approaches for species identification (SI) in 61 Mytilus mussels: the high-resolution melting analysis of the polyphenolic adhesive protein gene and the partial sequencing of the histone H1C gene. The H1C sequences were analyzed with five different methods. Both approaches show discrepancies in the identification of putative hybrids (0.0 < κ < 0.687 and 0.0 < MCC < 0.724). Excluding putative hybrids, methods show substantial to perfect agreement (0.772 < κ < 1.0 and 0.783 < MCC < 1.0). This study highlights the need to use standardized molecular tools, as well as to use multi-locus methods for SI of Mytilus mussels in testing laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9294527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92945272022-07-20 Comparison of two commercial methods for smooth-shelled mussels (Mytilus spp.) species identification Asorey, Cynthia M. Jilberto, Felipe Haase, Ilka Schubbert, Rainer Angélica Larraín, María Araneda, Cristián Food Chem (Oxf) Research Article Seafood international trade has increased the labeling requirements in standards and regulations to include product information that enable traders and consumers to make informed choices. The European Union (EU) Regulation No. 1379/2013 imposes the declaration of an official commercial designation and scientific names for all the fishery and aquaculture products to be offered for sale to the final consumers. DNA analyses are used to enforce this regulation and to test authenticity in processed foods. We compared the performance of two mono-locus approaches for species identification (SI) in 61 Mytilus mussels: the high-resolution melting analysis of the polyphenolic adhesive protein gene and the partial sequencing of the histone H1C gene. The H1C sequences were analyzed with five different methods. Both approaches show discrepancies in the identification of putative hybrids (0.0 < κ < 0.687 and 0.0 < MCC < 0.724). Excluding putative hybrids, methods show substantial to perfect agreement (0.772 < κ < 1.0 and 0.783 < MCC < 1.0). This study highlights the need to use standardized molecular tools, as well as to use multi-locus methods for SI of Mytilus mussels in testing laboratories. Elsevier 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9294527/ /pubmed/35865713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100121 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Asorey, Cynthia M.
Jilberto, Felipe
Haase, Ilka
Schubbert, Rainer
Angélica Larraín, María
Araneda, Cristián
Comparison of two commercial methods for smooth-shelled mussels (Mytilus spp.) species identification
title Comparison of two commercial methods for smooth-shelled mussels (Mytilus spp.) species identification
title_full Comparison of two commercial methods for smooth-shelled mussels (Mytilus spp.) species identification
title_fullStr Comparison of two commercial methods for smooth-shelled mussels (Mytilus spp.) species identification
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two commercial methods for smooth-shelled mussels (Mytilus spp.) species identification
title_short Comparison of two commercial methods for smooth-shelled mussels (Mytilus spp.) species identification
title_sort comparison of two commercial methods for smooth-shelled mussels (mytilus spp.) species identification
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35865713
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100121
work_keys_str_mv AT asoreycynthiam comparisonoftwocommercialmethodsforsmoothshelledmusselsmytilussppspeciesidentification
AT jilbertofelipe comparisonoftwocommercialmethodsforsmoothshelledmusselsmytilussppspeciesidentification
AT haaseilka comparisonoftwocommercialmethodsforsmoothshelledmusselsmytilussppspeciesidentification
AT schubbertrainer comparisonoftwocommercialmethodsforsmoothshelledmusselsmytilussppspeciesidentification
AT angelicalarrainmaria comparisonoftwocommercialmethodsforsmoothshelledmusselsmytilussppspeciesidentification
AT aranedacristian comparisonoftwocommercialmethodsforsmoothshelledmusselsmytilussppspeciesidentification