Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: A modelling study

BACKGROUND: The current community-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program in Shanghai, launched in 2013, invited individuals aged 50–74 years to triennial screening with a qualitative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and questionnaire-based risk assessment (RA). We aimed to evaluate the effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jie, de Jonge, Lucie, Cenin, Dayna R., Li, Pei, Tao, Sha, Yang, Chen, Yan, Bei, Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101891
_version_ 1784749886974984192
author Wang, Jie
de Jonge, Lucie
Cenin, Dayna R.
Li, Pei
Tao, Sha
Yang, Chen
Yan, Bei
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
author_facet Wang, Jie
de Jonge, Lucie
Cenin, Dayna R.
Li, Pei
Tao, Sha
Yang, Chen
Yan, Bei
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
author_sort Wang, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current community-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program in Shanghai, launched in 2013, invited individuals aged 50–74 years to triennial screening with a qualitative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and questionnaire-based risk assessment (RA). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the existing Shanghai screening program and compare it to using a validated two-sample quantitative FIT. METHODS: We simulated four strategies (no screening, Shanghai FIT, Shanghai FIT + RA and validated FIT) for the Shanghai screening program and evaluated CRC incidence, CRC mortality, the number of life years gained (LYG), the number of FITs, and colonoscopies required for each. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to assess the cost- effectiveness of each strategy. RESULTS: All screening modalities reduced CRC incidence and CRC mortality, gained extra number of LYG compared to no screening. Screening using the Shanghai FIT and validated FIT reduced CRC incidence from 45 cases to 43 per 1,000 simulated individuals (4.4%). Incidence was reduced to 42 cases (6.7%) using the Shanghai FIT + RA. All screening strategies reduced CRC mortality by 10.0% (from 10 to 9 deaths) and resulted in 6 to 7 LYG. The validated FIT was the most cost-effective among the evaluated strategies (ICER ¥26,461 per LYG). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that the current Shanghai screening program is (cost-) effective compared to no screening, but changing to a validated FIT would make the program more efficient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9294625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92946252022-07-20 Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: A modelling study Wang, Jie de Jonge, Lucie Cenin, Dayna R. Li, Pei Tao, Sha Yang, Chen Yan, Bei Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris Prev Med Rep Regular Article BACKGROUND: The current community-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program in Shanghai, launched in 2013, invited individuals aged 50–74 years to triennial screening with a qualitative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and questionnaire-based risk assessment (RA). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the existing Shanghai screening program and compare it to using a validated two-sample quantitative FIT. METHODS: We simulated four strategies (no screening, Shanghai FIT, Shanghai FIT + RA and validated FIT) for the Shanghai screening program and evaluated CRC incidence, CRC mortality, the number of life years gained (LYG), the number of FITs, and colonoscopies required for each. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to assess the cost- effectiveness of each strategy. RESULTS: All screening modalities reduced CRC incidence and CRC mortality, gained extra number of LYG compared to no screening. Screening using the Shanghai FIT and validated FIT reduced CRC incidence from 45 cases to 43 per 1,000 simulated individuals (4.4%). Incidence was reduced to 42 cases (6.7%) using the Shanghai FIT + RA. All screening strategies reduced CRC mortality by 10.0% (from 10 to 9 deaths) and resulted in 6 to 7 LYG. The validated FIT was the most cost-effective among the evaluated strategies (ICER ¥26,461 per LYG). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that the current Shanghai screening program is (cost-) effective compared to no screening, but changing to a validated FIT would make the program more efficient. 2022-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9294625/ /pubmed/35864929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101891 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Wang, Jie
de Jonge, Lucie
Cenin, Dayna R.
Li, Pei
Tao, Sha
Yang, Chen
Yan, Bei
Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: A modelling study
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: A modelling study
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: A modelling study
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: A modelling study
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: A modelling study
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: A modelling study
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in shanghai, china: a modelling study
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35864929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101891
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjie costeffectivenessanalysisofcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichinaamodellingstudy
AT dejongelucie costeffectivenessanalysisofcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichinaamodellingstudy
AT cenindaynar costeffectivenessanalysisofcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichinaamodellingstudy
AT lipei costeffectivenessanalysisofcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichinaamodellingstudy
AT taosha costeffectivenessanalysisofcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichinaamodellingstudy
AT yangchen costeffectivenessanalysisofcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichinaamodellingstudy
AT yanbei costeffectivenessanalysisofcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichinaamodellingstudy
AT lansdorpvogelaariris costeffectivenessanalysisofcolorectalcancerscreeninginshanghaichinaamodellingstudy