Cargando…

Remote surgical education using synthetic models combined with an augmented reality headset()

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate the use of an augmented reality headset to remotely train clinicians on medical devices using anatomic models. DESIGN: Disease-specific phantoms were developed to train physicians in mpMRI-guided fusion prostate biopsy, brachytherapy, and rectal spacer ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stone, Nelson N., Wilson, Michael P., Griffith, Steven H., Immerzeel, Jos, Debruyne, Frans, Gorin, Michael A., Brisbane, Wayne, Orio, Peter F., Kim, Laura S., Stone, Jonathan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2022.06.004
_version_ 1784749894352764928
author Stone, Nelson N.
Wilson, Michael P.
Griffith, Steven H.
Immerzeel, Jos
Debruyne, Frans
Gorin, Michael A.
Brisbane, Wayne
Orio, Peter F.
Kim, Laura S.
Stone, Jonathan J.
author_facet Stone, Nelson N.
Wilson, Michael P.
Griffith, Steven H.
Immerzeel, Jos
Debruyne, Frans
Gorin, Michael A.
Brisbane, Wayne
Orio, Peter F.
Kim, Laura S.
Stone, Jonathan J.
author_sort Stone, Nelson N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate the use of an augmented reality headset to remotely train clinicians on medical devices using anatomic models. DESIGN: Disease-specific phantoms were developed to train physicians in mpMRI-guided fusion prostate biopsy, brachytherapy, and rectal spacer insertion. Training was remotely demonstrated using 1-way virtual video conferencing format. Participants responded to an educational content survey. A heads-up display with software and augmented reality was used for remote 2-way training with the proctor and student using on their own phantoms. SETTING: The virtual video meeting took place during a prostate cancer conference in 2020, while the augmented reality training occurred in 2021. The proctor and student wore a heads-up display containing a projector and webcam where the ultrasound image was displayed onto a see-through optic along with the physician's hands. The heads-up display allowed the proctor to teach by line-of-sight while the student watched and repeated the steps. PARTICIPANTS: Faculty with expertise with the medical devices used in these procedures provided training to urologists unfamiliar with these techniques. RESULTS: Participants responded that the 1-way training on the phantoms was realistic and mimicked human tissue. A total of 70.9% requested more training or training on the phantoms. The remote training platform was successfully beta tested at the 2 locations in transperineal prostate biopsy and rectal spacer insertion. CONCLUSION: Remote training using augmented reality eliminates the need for travel. For training programs and workshops, this technology may mitigate the risk of infectious exposures, reduce training cost, and increase proctor availability, allowing training from their own institution or clinic. This investigation qualifies for the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competency in medical knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9294657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92946572022-07-20 Remote surgical education using synthetic models combined with an augmented reality headset() Stone, Nelson N. Wilson, Michael P. Griffith, Steven H. Immerzeel, Jos Debruyne, Frans Gorin, Michael A. Brisbane, Wayne Orio, Peter F. Kim, Laura S. Stone, Jonathan J. Surg Open Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate the use of an augmented reality headset to remotely train clinicians on medical devices using anatomic models. DESIGN: Disease-specific phantoms were developed to train physicians in mpMRI-guided fusion prostate biopsy, brachytherapy, and rectal spacer insertion. Training was remotely demonstrated using 1-way virtual video conferencing format. Participants responded to an educational content survey. A heads-up display with software and augmented reality was used for remote 2-way training with the proctor and student using on their own phantoms. SETTING: The virtual video meeting took place during a prostate cancer conference in 2020, while the augmented reality training occurred in 2021. The proctor and student wore a heads-up display containing a projector and webcam where the ultrasound image was displayed onto a see-through optic along with the physician's hands. The heads-up display allowed the proctor to teach by line-of-sight while the student watched and repeated the steps. PARTICIPANTS: Faculty with expertise with the medical devices used in these procedures provided training to urologists unfamiliar with these techniques. RESULTS: Participants responded that the 1-way training on the phantoms was realistic and mimicked human tissue. A total of 70.9% requested more training or training on the phantoms. The remote training platform was successfully beta tested at the 2 locations in transperineal prostate biopsy and rectal spacer insertion. CONCLUSION: Remote training using augmented reality eliminates the need for travel. For training programs and workshops, this technology may mitigate the risk of infectious exposures, reduce training cost, and increase proctor availability, allowing training from their own institution or clinic. This investigation qualifies for the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competency in medical knowledge. Elsevier 2022-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9294657/ /pubmed/35866070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2022.06.004 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Stone, Nelson N.
Wilson, Michael P.
Griffith, Steven H.
Immerzeel, Jos
Debruyne, Frans
Gorin, Michael A.
Brisbane, Wayne
Orio, Peter F.
Kim, Laura S.
Stone, Jonathan J.
Remote surgical education using synthetic models combined with an augmented reality headset()
title Remote surgical education using synthetic models combined with an augmented reality headset()
title_full Remote surgical education using synthetic models combined with an augmented reality headset()
title_fullStr Remote surgical education using synthetic models combined with an augmented reality headset()
title_full_unstemmed Remote surgical education using synthetic models combined with an augmented reality headset()
title_short Remote surgical education using synthetic models combined with an augmented reality headset()
title_sort remote surgical education using synthetic models combined with an augmented reality headset()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35866070
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2022.06.004
work_keys_str_mv AT stonenelsonn remotesurgicaleducationusingsyntheticmodelscombinedwithanaugmentedrealityheadset
AT wilsonmichaelp remotesurgicaleducationusingsyntheticmodelscombinedwithanaugmentedrealityheadset
AT griffithstevenh remotesurgicaleducationusingsyntheticmodelscombinedwithanaugmentedrealityheadset
AT immerzeeljos remotesurgicaleducationusingsyntheticmodelscombinedwithanaugmentedrealityheadset
AT debruynefrans remotesurgicaleducationusingsyntheticmodelscombinedwithanaugmentedrealityheadset
AT gorinmichaela remotesurgicaleducationusingsyntheticmodelscombinedwithanaugmentedrealityheadset
AT brisbanewayne remotesurgicaleducationusingsyntheticmodelscombinedwithanaugmentedrealityheadset
AT oriopeterf remotesurgicaleducationusingsyntheticmodelscombinedwithanaugmentedrealityheadset
AT kimlauras remotesurgicaleducationusingsyntheticmodelscombinedwithanaugmentedrealityheadset
AT stonejonathanj remotesurgicaleducationusingsyntheticmodelscombinedwithanaugmentedrealityheadset