Cargando…
From human business to machine learning—methods for automating real estate appraisals and their practical implications
Until recently, in most countries, the use of Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) in the lending process was only allowed for support purposes, and not as the sole value-determining tool. However, this is currently changing, and regulators around the world are actively discussing the approval of AVMs....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294847/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1365/s41056-022-00063-1 |
_version_ | 1784749933951188992 |
---|---|
author | Stang, Moritz Krämer, Bastian Nagl, Cathrine Schäfers, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Stang, Moritz Krämer, Bastian Nagl, Cathrine Schäfers, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Stang, Moritz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Until recently, in most countries, the use of Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) in the lending process was only allowed for support purposes, and not as the sole value-determining tool. However, this is currently changing, and regulators around the world are actively discussing the approval of AVMs. But the discussion is generally limited to AVMs that are based on already established methods such as an automation of the traditional sales comparison approach or linear regressions. Modern machine learning approaches are almost completely excluded from the debate. Accordingly, this study contributes to the discussion on why AVMs based on machine learning approaches should also be considered. For this purpose, an automation of the sales comparison method by using filters and similarity functions, two hedonic price functions, namely an OLS model and a GAM model, as well as a XGBoost machine learning approach, are applied to a dataset of 1.2 million residential properties across Germany. We find that the machine learning method XGBoost offers the overall best performance regarding the accuracy of estimations. Practical application shows that optimization of the established methods—OLS and GAM—is time-consuming and labor-intensive, and has significant disadvantages when being implemented on a national scale. In addition, our results show that different types of methods perform best in different regions and, thus, regulators should not only focus on one single method, but consider a multitude of them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9294847 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92948472022-07-19 From human business to machine learning—methods for automating real estate appraisals and their practical implications Stang, Moritz Krämer, Bastian Nagl, Cathrine Schäfers, Wolfgang Z Immobilienökonomie Original Paper Until recently, in most countries, the use of Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) in the lending process was only allowed for support purposes, and not as the sole value-determining tool. However, this is currently changing, and regulators around the world are actively discussing the approval of AVMs. But the discussion is generally limited to AVMs that are based on already established methods such as an automation of the traditional sales comparison approach or linear regressions. Modern machine learning approaches are almost completely excluded from the debate. Accordingly, this study contributes to the discussion on why AVMs based on machine learning approaches should also be considered. For this purpose, an automation of the sales comparison method by using filters and similarity functions, two hedonic price functions, namely an OLS model and a GAM model, as well as a XGBoost machine learning approach, are applied to a dataset of 1.2 million residential properties across Germany. We find that the machine learning method XGBoost offers the overall best performance regarding the accuracy of estimations. Practical application shows that optimization of the established methods—OLS and GAM—is time-consuming and labor-intensive, and has significant disadvantages when being implemented on a national scale. In addition, our results show that different types of methods perform best in different regions and, thus, regulators should not only focus on one single method, but consider a multitude of them. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9294847/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1365/s41056-022-00063-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Stang, Moritz Krämer, Bastian Nagl, Cathrine Schäfers, Wolfgang From human business to machine learning—methods for automating real estate appraisals and their practical implications |
title | From human business to machine learning—methods for automating real estate appraisals and their practical implications |
title_full | From human business to machine learning—methods for automating real estate appraisals and their practical implications |
title_fullStr | From human business to machine learning—methods for automating real estate appraisals and their practical implications |
title_full_unstemmed | From human business to machine learning—methods for automating real estate appraisals and their practical implications |
title_short | From human business to machine learning—methods for automating real estate appraisals and their practical implications |
title_sort | from human business to machine learning—methods for automating real estate appraisals and their practical implications |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294847/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1365/s41056-022-00063-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stangmoritz fromhumanbusinesstomachinelearningmethodsforautomatingrealestateappraisalsandtheirpracticalimplications AT kramerbastian fromhumanbusinesstomachinelearningmethodsforautomatingrealestateappraisalsandtheirpracticalimplications AT naglcathrine fromhumanbusinesstomachinelearningmethodsforautomatingrealestateappraisalsandtheirpracticalimplications AT schaferswolfgang fromhumanbusinesstomachinelearningmethodsforautomatingrealestateappraisalsandtheirpracticalimplications |