Cargando…

Considerations for Conducting Bring Your Own “Device” (BYOD) Clinical Studies

BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies are attracting attention as novel tools for data collection in clinical research. They present alternative methods compared to in-clinic data collection, which often yields snapshots of the participants' physiology, behavior, and function that may be pron...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Demanuele, Charmaine, Lokker, Cynthia, Jhaveri, Krishna, Georgiev, Pirinka, Sezgin, Emre, Geoghegan, Cindy, Zou, Kelly H., Izmailova, Elena, McCarthy, Marie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525080
_version_ 1784749956638179328
author Demanuele, Charmaine
Lokker, Cynthia
Jhaveri, Krishna
Georgiev, Pirinka
Sezgin, Emre
Geoghegan, Cindy
Zou, Kelly H.
Izmailova, Elena
McCarthy, Marie
author_facet Demanuele, Charmaine
Lokker, Cynthia
Jhaveri, Krishna
Georgiev, Pirinka
Sezgin, Emre
Geoghegan, Cindy
Zou, Kelly H.
Izmailova, Elena
McCarthy, Marie
author_sort Demanuele, Charmaine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies are attracting attention as novel tools for data collection in clinical research. They present alternative methods compared to in-clinic data collection, which often yields snapshots of the participants' physiology, behavior, and function that may be prone to biases and artifacts, e.g., white coat hypertension, and not representative of the data in free-living conditions. Modern digital health technologies equipped with multi-modal sensors combine different data streams to derive comprehensive endpoints that are important to study participants and are clinically meaningful. Used for data collection in clinical trials, they can be deployed as provisioned products where technology is given at study start or in a bring your own “device” (BYOD) manner where participants use their technologies to generate study data. SUMMARY: The BYOD option has the potential to be more user-friendly, allowing participants to use technologies that they are familiar with, ensuring better participant compliance, and potentially reducing the bias that comes with introducing new technologies. However, this approach presents different technical, operational, regulatory, and ethical challenges to study teams. For example, BYOD data can be more heterogeneous, and recruiting historically underrepresented populations with limited access to technology and the internet can be challenging. Despite the rapid increase in digital health technologies for clinical and healthcare research, BYOD use in clinical trials is limited, and regulatory guidance is still evolving. KEY MESSAGES: We offer considerations for academic researchers, drug developers, and patient advocacy organizations on the design and deployment of BYOD models in clinical research. These considerations address: (1) early identification and engagement with internal and external stakeholders; (2) study design including informed consent and recruitment strategies; (3) outcome, endpoint, and technology selection; (4) data management including compliance and data monitoring; (5) statistical considerations to meet regulatory requirements. We believe that this article acts as a primer, providing insights into study design and operational requirements to ensure the successful implementation of BYOD clinical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9294934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92949342022-08-09 Considerations for Conducting Bring Your Own “Device” (BYOD) Clinical Studies Demanuele, Charmaine Lokker, Cynthia Jhaveri, Krishna Georgiev, Pirinka Sezgin, Emre Geoghegan, Cindy Zou, Kelly H. Izmailova, Elena McCarthy, Marie Digit Biomark Tools and Devices - Review Article BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies are attracting attention as novel tools for data collection in clinical research. They present alternative methods compared to in-clinic data collection, which often yields snapshots of the participants' physiology, behavior, and function that may be prone to biases and artifacts, e.g., white coat hypertension, and not representative of the data in free-living conditions. Modern digital health technologies equipped with multi-modal sensors combine different data streams to derive comprehensive endpoints that are important to study participants and are clinically meaningful. Used for data collection in clinical trials, they can be deployed as provisioned products where technology is given at study start or in a bring your own “device” (BYOD) manner where participants use their technologies to generate study data. SUMMARY: The BYOD option has the potential to be more user-friendly, allowing participants to use technologies that they are familiar with, ensuring better participant compliance, and potentially reducing the bias that comes with introducing new technologies. However, this approach presents different technical, operational, regulatory, and ethical challenges to study teams. For example, BYOD data can be more heterogeneous, and recruiting historically underrepresented populations with limited access to technology and the internet can be challenging. Despite the rapid increase in digital health technologies for clinical and healthcare research, BYOD use in clinical trials is limited, and regulatory guidance is still evolving. KEY MESSAGES: We offer considerations for academic researchers, drug developers, and patient advocacy organizations on the design and deployment of BYOD models in clinical research. These considerations address: (1) early identification and engagement with internal and external stakeholders; (2) study design including informed consent and recruitment strategies; (3) outcome, endpoint, and technology selection; (4) data management including compliance and data monitoring; (5) statistical considerations to meet regulatory requirements. We believe that this article acts as a primer, providing insights into study design and operational requirements to ensure the successful implementation of BYOD clinical studies. S. Karger AG 2022-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9294934/ /pubmed/35949223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525080 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
spellingShingle Tools and Devices - Review Article
Demanuele, Charmaine
Lokker, Cynthia
Jhaveri, Krishna
Georgiev, Pirinka
Sezgin, Emre
Geoghegan, Cindy
Zou, Kelly H.
Izmailova, Elena
McCarthy, Marie
Considerations for Conducting Bring Your Own “Device” (BYOD) Clinical Studies
title Considerations for Conducting Bring Your Own “Device” (BYOD) Clinical Studies
title_full Considerations for Conducting Bring Your Own “Device” (BYOD) Clinical Studies
title_fullStr Considerations for Conducting Bring Your Own “Device” (BYOD) Clinical Studies
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for Conducting Bring Your Own “Device” (BYOD) Clinical Studies
title_short Considerations for Conducting Bring Your Own “Device” (BYOD) Clinical Studies
title_sort considerations for conducting bring your own “device” (byod) clinical studies
topic Tools and Devices - Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9294934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35949223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525080
work_keys_str_mv AT demanuelecharmaine considerationsforconductingbringyourowndevicebyodclinicalstudies
AT lokkercynthia considerationsforconductingbringyourowndevicebyodclinicalstudies
AT jhaverikrishna considerationsforconductingbringyourowndevicebyodclinicalstudies
AT georgievpirinka considerationsforconductingbringyourowndevicebyodclinicalstudies
AT sezginemre considerationsforconductingbringyourowndevicebyodclinicalstudies
AT geoghegancindy considerationsforconductingbringyourowndevicebyodclinicalstudies
AT zoukellyh considerationsforconductingbringyourowndevicebyodclinicalstudies
AT izmailovaelena considerationsforconductingbringyourowndevicebyodclinicalstudies
AT mccarthymarie considerationsforconductingbringyourowndevicebyodclinicalstudies