Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) covid-19 vaccines against infection and covid-19 disease in health and social care workers. DESIGN: Cohort study, emulating a comparative effectiveness trial, on behalf of NHS England....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hulme, William J, Williamson, Elizabeth J, Green, Amelia C A, Bhaskaran, Krishnan, McDonald, Helen I, Rentsch, Christopher T, Schultze, Anna, Tazare, John, Curtis, Helen J, Walker, Alex J, Tomlinson, Laurie A, Palmer, Tom, Horne, Elsie M F, MacKenna, Brian, Morton, Caroline E, Mehrkar, Amir, Morley, Jessica, Fisher, Louis, Bacon, Sebastian C J, Evans, David, Inglesby, Peter, Hickman, George, Davy, Simon, Ward, Tom, Croker, Richard, Eggo, Rosalind M, Wong, Angel Y S, Mathur, Rohini, Wing, Kevin, Forbes, Harriet, Grint, Daniel J, Douglas, Ian J, Evans, Stephen J W, Smeeth, Liam, Bates, Chris, Cockburn, Jonathan, Parry, John, Hester, Frank, Harper, Sam, Sterne, Jonathan A C, Hernán, Miguel A, Goldacre, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068946
_version_ 1784749983198609408
author Hulme, William J
Williamson, Elizabeth J
Green, Amelia C A
Bhaskaran, Krishnan
McDonald, Helen I
Rentsch, Christopher T
Schultze, Anna
Tazare, John
Curtis, Helen J
Walker, Alex J
Tomlinson, Laurie A
Palmer, Tom
Horne, Elsie M F
MacKenna, Brian
Morton, Caroline E
Mehrkar, Amir
Morley, Jessica
Fisher, Louis
Bacon, Sebastian C J
Evans, David
Inglesby, Peter
Hickman, George
Davy, Simon
Ward, Tom
Croker, Richard
Eggo, Rosalind M
Wong, Angel Y S
Mathur, Rohini
Wing, Kevin
Forbes, Harriet
Grint, Daniel J
Douglas, Ian J
Evans, Stephen J W
Smeeth, Liam
Bates, Chris
Cockburn, Jonathan
Parry, John
Hester, Frank
Harper, Sam
Sterne, Jonathan A C
Hernán, Miguel A
Goldacre, Ben
author_facet Hulme, William J
Williamson, Elizabeth J
Green, Amelia C A
Bhaskaran, Krishnan
McDonald, Helen I
Rentsch, Christopher T
Schultze, Anna
Tazare, John
Curtis, Helen J
Walker, Alex J
Tomlinson, Laurie A
Palmer, Tom
Horne, Elsie M F
MacKenna, Brian
Morton, Caroline E
Mehrkar, Amir
Morley, Jessica
Fisher, Louis
Bacon, Sebastian C J
Evans, David
Inglesby, Peter
Hickman, George
Davy, Simon
Ward, Tom
Croker, Richard
Eggo, Rosalind M
Wong, Angel Y S
Mathur, Rohini
Wing, Kevin
Forbes, Harriet
Grint, Daniel J
Douglas, Ian J
Evans, Stephen J W
Smeeth, Liam
Bates, Chris
Cockburn, Jonathan
Parry, John
Hester, Frank
Harper, Sam
Sterne, Jonathan A C
Hernán, Miguel A
Goldacre, Ben
author_sort Hulme, William J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) covid-19 vaccines against infection and covid-19 disease in health and social care workers. DESIGN: Cohort study, emulating a comparative effectiveness trial, on behalf of NHS England. SETTING: Linked primary care, hospital, and covid-19 surveillance records available within the OpenSAFELY-TPP research platform, covering a period when the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant was dominant. PARTICIPANTS: 317 341 health and social care workers vaccinated between 4 January and 28 February 2021, registered with a general practice using the TPP SystmOne clinical information system in England, and not clinically extremely vulnerable. INTERVENTIONS: Vaccination with either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 administered as part of the national covid-19 vaccine roll-out. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recorded SARS-CoV-2 positive test, or covid-19 related attendance at an accident and emergency (A&E) department or hospital admission occurring within 20 weeks of receipt of the first vaccine dose. RESULTS: Over the duration of 118 771 person-years of follow-up there were 6962 positive SARS-CoV-2 tests, 282 covid-19 related A&E attendances, and 166 covid-19 related hospital admissions. The cumulative incidence of each outcome was similar for both vaccines during the first 20 weeks after vaccination. The cumulative incidence of recorded SARS-CoV-2 infection 20 weeks after first-dose vaccination with BNT162b2 was 21.7 per 1000 people (95% confidence interval 20.9 to 22.4) and with ChAdOx1 was 23.7 (21.8 to 25.6), representing a difference of 2.04 per 1000 people (0.04 to 4.04). The difference in the cumulative incidence per 1000 people of covid-19 related A&E attendance at 20 weeks was 0.06 per 1000 people (95% CI −0.31 to 0.43). For covid-19 related hospital admission, this difference was 0.11 per 1000 people (−0.22 to 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of healthcare workers where we would not anticipate vaccine type to be related to health status, we found no substantial differences in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection or covid-19 disease up to 20 weeks after vaccination. Incidence dropped sharply at 3-4 weeks after vaccination, and there were few covid-19 related hospital attendance and admission events after this period. This is in line with expected onset of vaccine induced immunity and suggests strong protection against Alpha variant covid-19 disease for both vaccines in this relatively young and healthy population of healthcare workers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9295078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-92950782022-07-20 Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY Hulme, William J Williamson, Elizabeth J Green, Amelia C A Bhaskaran, Krishnan McDonald, Helen I Rentsch, Christopher T Schultze, Anna Tazare, John Curtis, Helen J Walker, Alex J Tomlinson, Laurie A Palmer, Tom Horne, Elsie M F MacKenna, Brian Morton, Caroline E Mehrkar, Amir Morley, Jessica Fisher, Louis Bacon, Sebastian C J Evans, David Inglesby, Peter Hickman, George Davy, Simon Ward, Tom Croker, Richard Eggo, Rosalind M Wong, Angel Y S Mathur, Rohini Wing, Kevin Forbes, Harriet Grint, Daniel J Douglas, Ian J Evans, Stephen J W Smeeth, Liam Bates, Chris Cockburn, Jonathan Parry, John Hester, Frank Harper, Sam Sterne, Jonathan A C Hernán, Miguel A Goldacre, Ben BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) covid-19 vaccines against infection and covid-19 disease in health and social care workers. DESIGN: Cohort study, emulating a comparative effectiveness trial, on behalf of NHS England. SETTING: Linked primary care, hospital, and covid-19 surveillance records available within the OpenSAFELY-TPP research platform, covering a period when the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant was dominant. PARTICIPANTS: 317 341 health and social care workers vaccinated between 4 January and 28 February 2021, registered with a general practice using the TPP SystmOne clinical information system in England, and not clinically extremely vulnerable. INTERVENTIONS: Vaccination with either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 administered as part of the national covid-19 vaccine roll-out. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recorded SARS-CoV-2 positive test, or covid-19 related attendance at an accident and emergency (A&E) department or hospital admission occurring within 20 weeks of receipt of the first vaccine dose. RESULTS: Over the duration of 118 771 person-years of follow-up there were 6962 positive SARS-CoV-2 tests, 282 covid-19 related A&E attendances, and 166 covid-19 related hospital admissions. The cumulative incidence of each outcome was similar for both vaccines during the first 20 weeks after vaccination. The cumulative incidence of recorded SARS-CoV-2 infection 20 weeks after first-dose vaccination with BNT162b2 was 21.7 per 1000 people (95% confidence interval 20.9 to 22.4) and with ChAdOx1 was 23.7 (21.8 to 25.6), representing a difference of 2.04 per 1000 people (0.04 to 4.04). The difference in the cumulative incidence per 1000 people of covid-19 related A&E attendance at 20 weeks was 0.06 per 1000 people (95% CI −0.31 to 0.43). For covid-19 related hospital admission, this difference was 0.11 per 1000 people (−0.22 to 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of healthcare workers where we would not anticipate vaccine type to be related to health status, we found no substantial differences in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection or covid-19 disease up to 20 weeks after vaccination. Incidence dropped sharply at 3-4 weeks after vaccination, and there were few covid-19 related hospital attendance and admission events after this period. This is in line with expected onset of vaccine induced immunity and suggests strong protection against Alpha variant covid-19 disease for both vaccines in this relatively young and healthy population of healthcare workers. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9295078/ /pubmed/35858680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068946 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Hulme, William J
Williamson, Elizabeth J
Green, Amelia C A
Bhaskaran, Krishnan
McDonald, Helen I
Rentsch, Christopher T
Schultze, Anna
Tazare, John
Curtis, Helen J
Walker, Alex J
Tomlinson, Laurie A
Palmer, Tom
Horne, Elsie M F
MacKenna, Brian
Morton, Caroline E
Mehrkar, Amir
Morley, Jessica
Fisher, Louis
Bacon, Sebastian C J
Evans, David
Inglesby, Peter
Hickman, George
Davy, Simon
Ward, Tom
Croker, Richard
Eggo, Rosalind M
Wong, Angel Y S
Mathur, Rohini
Wing, Kevin
Forbes, Harriet
Grint, Daniel J
Douglas, Ian J
Evans, Stephen J W
Smeeth, Liam
Bates, Chris
Cockburn, Jonathan
Parry, John
Hester, Frank
Harper, Sam
Sterne, Jonathan A C
Hernán, Miguel A
Goldacre, Ben
Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY
title Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY
title_full Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY
title_short Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY
title_sort comparative effectiveness of chadox1 versus bnt162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in england: cohort study using opensafely
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068946
work_keys_str_mv AT hulmewilliamj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT williamsonelizabethj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT greenameliaca comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT bhaskarankrishnan comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT mcdonaldheleni comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT rentschchristophert comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT schultzeanna comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT tazarejohn comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT curtishelenj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT walkeralexj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT tomlinsonlauriea comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT palmertom comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT horneelsiemf comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT mackennabrian comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT mortoncarolinee comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT mehrkaramir comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT morleyjessica comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT fisherlouis comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT baconsebastiancj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT evansdavid comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT inglesbypeter comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT hickmangeorge comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT davysimon comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT wardtom comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT crokerrichard comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT eggorosalindm comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT wongangelys comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT mathurrohini comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT wingkevin comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT forbesharriet comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT grintdanielj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT douglasianj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT evansstephenjw comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT smeethliam comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT bateschris comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT cockburnjonathan comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT parryjohn comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT hesterfrank comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT harpersam comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT sternejonathanac comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT hernanmiguela comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely
AT goldacreben comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely