Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) covid-19 vaccines against infection and covid-19 disease in health and social care workers. DESIGN: Cohort study, emulating a comparative effectiveness trial, on behalf of NHS England....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068946 |
_version_ | 1784749983198609408 |
---|---|
author | Hulme, William J Williamson, Elizabeth J Green, Amelia C A Bhaskaran, Krishnan McDonald, Helen I Rentsch, Christopher T Schultze, Anna Tazare, John Curtis, Helen J Walker, Alex J Tomlinson, Laurie A Palmer, Tom Horne, Elsie M F MacKenna, Brian Morton, Caroline E Mehrkar, Amir Morley, Jessica Fisher, Louis Bacon, Sebastian C J Evans, David Inglesby, Peter Hickman, George Davy, Simon Ward, Tom Croker, Richard Eggo, Rosalind M Wong, Angel Y S Mathur, Rohini Wing, Kevin Forbes, Harriet Grint, Daniel J Douglas, Ian J Evans, Stephen J W Smeeth, Liam Bates, Chris Cockburn, Jonathan Parry, John Hester, Frank Harper, Sam Sterne, Jonathan A C Hernán, Miguel A Goldacre, Ben |
author_facet | Hulme, William J Williamson, Elizabeth J Green, Amelia C A Bhaskaran, Krishnan McDonald, Helen I Rentsch, Christopher T Schultze, Anna Tazare, John Curtis, Helen J Walker, Alex J Tomlinson, Laurie A Palmer, Tom Horne, Elsie M F MacKenna, Brian Morton, Caroline E Mehrkar, Amir Morley, Jessica Fisher, Louis Bacon, Sebastian C J Evans, David Inglesby, Peter Hickman, George Davy, Simon Ward, Tom Croker, Richard Eggo, Rosalind M Wong, Angel Y S Mathur, Rohini Wing, Kevin Forbes, Harriet Grint, Daniel J Douglas, Ian J Evans, Stephen J W Smeeth, Liam Bates, Chris Cockburn, Jonathan Parry, John Hester, Frank Harper, Sam Sterne, Jonathan A C Hernán, Miguel A Goldacre, Ben |
author_sort | Hulme, William J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) covid-19 vaccines against infection and covid-19 disease in health and social care workers. DESIGN: Cohort study, emulating a comparative effectiveness trial, on behalf of NHS England. SETTING: Linked primary care, hospital, and covid-19 surveillance records available within the OpenSAFELY-TPP research platform, covering a period when the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant was dominant. PARTICIPANTS: 317 341 health and social care workers vaccinated between 4 January and 28 February 2021, registered with a general practice using the TPP SystmOne clinical information system in England, and not clinically extremely vulnerable. INTERVENTIONS: Vaccination with either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 administered as part of the national covid-19 vaccine roll-out. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recorded SARS-CoV-2 positive test, or covid-19 related attendance at an accident and emergency (A&E) department or hospital admission occurring within 20 weeks of receipt of the first vaccine dose. RESULTS: Over the duration of 118 771 person-years of follow-up there were 6962 positive SARS-CoV-2 tests, 282 covid-19 related A&E attendances, and 166 covid-19 related hospital admissions. The cumulative incidence of each outcome was similar for both vaccines during the first 20 weeks after vaccination. The cumulative incidence of recorded SARS-CoV-2 infection 20 weeks after first-dose vaccination with BNT162b2 was 21.7 per 1000 people (95% confidence interval 20.9 to 22.4) and with ChAdOx1 was 23.7 (21.8 to 25.6), representing a difference of 2.04 per 1000 people (0.04 to 4.04). The difference in the cumulative incidence per 1000 people of covid-19 related A&E attendance at 20 weeks was 0.06 per 1000 people (95% CI −0.31 to 0.43). For covid-19 related hospital admission, this difference was 0.11 per 1000 people (−0.22 to 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of healthcare workers where we would not anticipate vaccine type to be related to health status, we found no substantial differences in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection or covid-19 disease up to 20 weeks after vaccination. Incidence dropped sharply at 3-4 weeks after vaccination, and there were few covid-19 related hospital attendance and admission events after this period. This is in line with expected onset of vaccine induced immunity and suggests strong protection against Alpha variant covid-19 disease for both vaccines in this relatively young and healthy population of healthcare workers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9295078 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-92950782022-07-20 Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY Hulme, William J Williamson, Elizabeth J Green, Amelia C A Bhaskaran, Krishnan McDonald, Helen I Rentsch, Christopher T Schultze, Anna Tazare, John Curtis, Helen J Walker, Alex J Tomlinson, Laurie A Palmer, Tom Horne, Elsie M F MacKenna, Brian Morton, Caroline E Mehrkar, Amir Morley, Jessica Fisher, Louis Bacon, Sebastian C J Evans, David Inglesby, Peter Hickman, George Davy, Simon Ward, Tom Croker, Richard Eggo, Rosalind M Wong, Angel Y S Mathur, Rohini Wing, Kevin Forbes, Harriet Grint, Daniel J Douglas, Ian J Evans, Stephen J W Smeeth, Liam Bates, Chris Cockburn, Jonathan Parry, John Hester, Frank Harper, Sam Sterne, Jonathan A C Hernán, Miguel A Goldacre, Ben BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) covid-19 vaccines against infection and covid-19 disease in health and social care workers. DESIGN: Cohort study, emulating a comparative effectiveness trial, on behalf of NHS England. SETTING: Linked primary care, hospital, and covid-19 surveillance records available within the OpenSAFELY-TPP research platform, covering a period when the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant was dominant. PARTICIPANTS: 317 341 health and social care workers vaccinated between 4 January and 28 February 2021, registered with a general practice using the TPP SystmOne clinical information system in England, and not clinically extremely vulnerable. INTERVENTIONS: Vaccination with either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 administered as part of the national covid-19 vaccine roll-out. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recorded SARS-CoV-2 positive test, or covid-19 related attendance at an accident and emergency (A&E) department or hospital admission occurring within 20 weeks of receipt of the first vaccine dose. RESULTS: Over the duration of 118 771 person-years of follow-up there were 6962 positive SARS-CoV-2 tests, 282 covid-19 related A&E attendances, and 166 covid-19 related hospital admissions. The cumulative incidence of each outcome was similar for both vaccines during the first 20 weeks after vaccination. The cumulative incidence of recorded SARS-CoV-2 infection 20 weeks after first-dose vaccination with BNT162b2 was 21.7 per 1000 people (95% confidence interval 20.9 to 22.4) and with ChAdOx1 was 23.7 (21.8 to 25.6), representing a difference of 2.04 per 1000 people (0.04 to 4.04). The difference in the cumulative incidence per 1000 people of covid-19 related A&E attendance at 20 weeks was 0.06 per 1000 people (95% CI −0.31 to 0.43). For covid-19 related hospital admission, this difference was 0.11 per 1000 people (−0.22 to 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of healthcare workers where we would not anticipate vaccine type to be related to health status, we found no substantial differences in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection or covid-19 disease up to 20 weeks after vaccination. Incidence dropped sharply at 3-4 weeks after vaccination, and there were few covid-19 related hospital attendance and admission events after this period. This is in line with expected onset of vaccine induced immunity and suggests strong protection against Alpha variant covid-19 disease for both vaccines in this relatively young and healthy population of healthcare workers. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2022-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9295078/ /pubmed/35858680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068946 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Hulme, William J Williamson, Elizabeth J Green, Amelia C A Bhaskaran, Krishnan McDonald, Helen I Rentsch, Christopher T Schultze, Anna Tazare, John Curtis, Helen J Walker, Alex J Tomlinson, Laurie A Palmer, Tom Horne, Elsie M F MacKenna, Brian Morton, Caroline E Mehrkar, Amir Morley, Jessica Fisher, Louis Bacon, Sebastian C J Evans, David Inglesby, Peter Hickman, George Davy, Simon Ward, Tom Croker, Richard Eggo, Rosalind M Wong, Angel Y S Mathur, Rohini Wing, Kevin Forbes, Harriet Grint, Daniel J Douglas, Ian J Evans, Stephen J W Smeeth, Liam Bates, Chris Cockburn, Jonathan Parry, John Hester, Frank Harper, Sam Sterne, Jonathan A C Hernán, Miguel A Goldacre, Ben Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY |
title | Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of ChAdOx1 versus BNT162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in England: cohort study using OpenSAFELY |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of chadox1 versus bnt162b2 covid-19 vaccines in health and social care workers in england: cohort study using opensafely |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9295078/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068946 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hulmewilliamj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT williamsonelizabethj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT greenameliaca comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT bhaskarankrishnan comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT mcdonaldheleni comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT rentschchristophert comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT schultzeanna comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT tazarejohn comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT curtishelenj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT walkeralexj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT tomlinsonlauriea comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT palmertom comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT horneelsiemf comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT mackennabrian comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT mortoncarolinee comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT mehrkaramir comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT morleyjessica comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT fisherlouis comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT baconsebastiancj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT evansdavid comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT inglesbypeter comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT hickmangeorge comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT davysimon comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT wardtom comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT crokerrichard comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT eggorosalindm comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT wongangelys comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT mathurrohini comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT wingkevin comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT forbesharriet comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT grintdanielj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT douglasianj comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT evansstephenjw comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT smeethliam comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT bateschris comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT cockburnjonathan comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT parryjohn comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT hesterfrank comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT harpersam comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT sternejonathanac comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT hernanmiguela comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely AT goldacreben comparativeeffectivenessofchadox1versusbnt162b2covid19vaccinesinhealthandsocialcareworkersinenglandcohortstudyusingopensafely |